Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-P / Italy / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Report date | 2025-09-11 10:38:38 |
MAD-IT-MS-AS
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Phytoplankton communities
|
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
ABU-REL
|
Concentration in water
|
SPP-C
|
ABU-REL
|
Concentration in water
|
SPP-C
|
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
96.0 |
52399.0 |
482.0 |
4.0 |
1962.0 |
98.0 |
Value achieved lower |
1963.62 |
359.0 |
721.0 |
77.0 |
||
Value unit |
percentage
|
cells/L
|
species
|
percentage
|
individuals/m2
|
species
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
No assessment was conducted in 2018 so the trend parameter is """"unknown"""" . The parameter achieved is """"unknown"""" because there are methodological gaps |
No assessment was conducted in 2018 so the trend parameter is """"unknown"""" . The parameter achieved is """"unknown"""" because there are methodological gaps |
No assessment was conducted in 2018 so the trend parameter is """"unknown"""" . The parameter achieved is """"unknown"""" because there are methodological gaps |
No assessment was conducted in 2018 so the trend parameter is """"unknown"""" . The parameter achieved is """"unknown"""" because there are methodological gaps |
No assessment was conducted in 2018 so the trend parameter is """"unknown"""" . The parameter achieved is """"unknown"""" because there are methodological gaps |
No assessment was conducted in 2018 so the trend parameter is """"unknown"""" . The parameter achieved is """"unknown"""" because there are methodological gaps |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
All parameters are """"unknown"""" consequently the criterion is also """"unknown"""" |
All parameters are """"unknown"""" consequently the criterion is also """"unknown"""" |
All parameters are """"unknown"""" consequently the criterion is also """"unknown"""" |
All parameters are """"unknown"""" consequently the criterion is also """"unknown"""" |
All parameters are """"unknown"""" consequently the criterion is also """"unknown"""" |
All parameters are """"unknown"""" consequently the criterion is also """"unknown"""" |
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
The associated Criterium Status is """"unknown"""" consequently the Element is also """"unknown"""" |
The associated Criterium Status is """"unknown"""" consequently the Element is also """"unknown"""" |
The associated Criterium Status is """"unknown"""" consequently the Element is also """"unknown"""" |
The associated Criterium Status is """"unknown"""" consequently the Element is also """"unknown"""" |
The associated Criterium Status is """"unknown"""" consequently the Element is also """"unknown"""" |
The associated Criterium Status is """"unknown"""" consequently the Element is also """"unknown"""" |
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No proper methodology for the integration of parameters has been defined. In this specific case, all evaluated parameters are in an """"Unknown"""" state due to the lack of reference threshold values. Consequently, the status of the Criterion is necessarily """"Unknown."""" Simultaneously, new indices (alpha diversity: Shannon-Wiener, Gini-Simpson, Rao; beta Diversity: Local Contribution to Beta Diversity, Importance Value Index) are being studied to enable future assessment of the achievement of GES |
No proper methodology for the integration of parameters has been defined. In this specific case, all evaluated parameters are in an """"Unknown"""" state due to the lack of reference threshold values. Consequently, the status of the Criterion is necessarily """"Unknown."""" Simultaneously, new indices (alpha diversity: Shannon-Wiener, Gini-Simpson, Rao; beta Diversity: Local Contribution to Beta Diversity, Importance Value Index) are being studied to enable future assessment of the achievement of GES |
No proper methodology for the integration of parameters has been defined. In this specific case, all evaluated parameters are in an """"Unknown"""" state due to the lack of reference threshold values. Consequently, the status of the Criterion is necessarily """"Unknown."""" Simultaneously, new indices (alpha diversity: Shannon-Wiener, Gini-Simpson, Rao; beta Diversity: Local Contribution to Beta Diversity, Importance Value Index) are being studied to enable future assessment of the achievement of GES |
No proper methodology for the integration of parameters has been defined. In this specific case, all evaluated parameters are in an """"Unknown"""" state due to the lack of reference threshold values. Consequently, the status of the Criterion is necessarily """"Unknown."""" Simultaneously, new indices (alpha diversity: Shannon-Wiener, Gini-Simpson, Rao; beta Diversity: Local Contribution to Beta Diversity, Importance Value Index) are being studied to enable future assessment of the achievement of GES |
No proper methodology for the integration of parameters has been defined. In this specific case, all evaluated parameters are in an """"Unknown"""" state due to the lack of reference threshold values. Consequently, the status of the Criterion is necessarily """"Unknown."""" Simultaneously, new indices (alpha diversity: Shannon-Wiener, Gini-Simpson, Rao; beta Diversity: Local Contribution to Beta Diversity, Importance Value Index) are being studied to enable future assessment of the achievement of GES |
No proper methodology for the integration of parameters has been defined. In this specific case, all evaluated parameters are in an """"Unknown"""" state due to the lack of reference threshold values. Consequently, the status of the Criterion is necessarily """"Unknown."""" Simultaneously, new indices (alpha diversity: Shannon-Wiener, Gini-Simpson, Rao; beta Diversity: Local Contribution to Beta Diversity, Importance Value Index) are being studied to enable future assessment of the achievement of GES |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
No assessment was conducted in 2018. Knowledge or methodological gaps for the study of biodiversity, along with the lack of agreed threshold values at the Mediterranean region level (UNEP-MAP, Barcelona Convention), did not allow for determining whether Good Environmental Status (GES) had been achieved or not |
No assessment was conducted in 2018. Knowledge or methodological gaps for the study of biodiversity, along with the lack of agreed threshold values at the Mediterranean region level (UNEP-MAP, Barcelona Convention), did not allow for determining whether Good Environmental Status (GES) had been achieved or not |
No assessment was conducted in 2018. Knowledge or methodological gaps for the study of biodiversity, along with the lack of agreed threshold values at the Mediterranean region level (UNEP-MAP, Barcelona Convention), did not allow for determining whether Good Environmental Status (GES) had been achieved or not |
No assessment was conducted in 2018. Knowledge or methodological gaps for the study of biodiversity, along with the lack of agreed threshold values at the Mediterranean region level (UNEP-MAP, Barcelona Convention), did not allow for determining whether Good Environmental Status (GES) had been achieved or not |
No assessment was conducted in 2018. Knowledge or methodological gaps for the study of biodiversity, along with the lack of agreed threshold values at the Mediterranean region level (UNEP-MAP, Barcelona Convention), did not allow for determining whether Good Environmental Status (GES) had been achieved or not |
No assessment was conducted in 2018. Knowledge or methodological gaps for the study of biodiversity, along with the lack of agreed threshold values at the Mediterranean region level (UNEP-MAP, Barcelona Convention), did not allow for determining whether Good Environmental Status (GES) had been achieved or not |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |