Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D3 / Italy / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Report date | 2025-09-11 10:38:38 |
MAD-IT-MS-AS
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Alloteuthis media |
Alloteuthis media |
Alloteuthis media |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Bolinus brandaris |
Bolinus brandaris |
Bolinus brandaris |
Chamelea gallina |
Chamelea gallina |
Chamelea gallina |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone moschata |
Eledone moschata |
Eledone moschata |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Illex coindetii |
Illex coindetii |
Illex coindetii |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mustelus mustelus |
Mustelus mustelus |
Mustelus mustelus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Pecten jacobaeus |
Pecten jacobaeus |
Pecten jacobaeus |
Penaeus kerathurus |
Penaeus kerathurus |
Penaeus kerathurus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Squilla mantis |
Squilla mantis |
Squilla mantis |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trisopterus minutus |
Trisopterus minutus |
Trisopterus minutus |
Zeus faber |
Zeus faber |
Zeus faber |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Midsize squid (Alloteuthis media) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Midsize squid (Alloteuthis media) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Midsize squid (Alloteuthis media) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 18-19-20 |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 18-19-20 |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 18-19-20 |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSAs 18-19-20 |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSAs 18-19-20 |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSAs 18-19-20 |
Purple dye murex (Bolinus brandaris) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Purple dye murex (Bolinus brandaris) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Purple dye murex (Bolinus brandaris) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Striped venus (Chamelea gallina) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Striped venus (Chamelea gallina) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Striped venus (Chamelea gallina) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Tub gurnard (Chelidonichthys lucerna) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Tub gurnard (Chelidonichthys lucerna) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Tub gurnard (Chelidonichthys lucerna) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSA 18 (Southern Adriatic Sea) |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSA 18 (Southern Adriatic Sea) |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSA 18 (Southern Adriatic Sea) |
Musky octopus (Eledone moschata) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Musky octopus (Eledone moschata) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Musky octopus (Eledone moschata) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
European squid (Loligo vulgaris) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
European squid (Loligo vulgaris) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
European squid (Loligo vulgaris) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Smooth-hound (Mustelus mustelus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Smooth-hound (Mustelus mustelus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Smooth-hound (Mustelus mustelus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Deep-water rose shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) in GSAs 17-18-19 |
Deep-water rose shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) in GSAs 17-18-19 |
Deep-water rose shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) in GSAs 17-18-19 |
Great Mediterranean scallop (Pecten jacobaeus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Great Mediterranean scallop (Pecten jacobaeus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Great Mediterranean scallop (Pecten jacobaeus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Caramote prawn (Penaeus kerathurus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Caramote prawn (Penaeus kerathurus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Caramote prawn (Penaeus kerathurus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) in GSA 17 (Adriatic Sea) |
Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) in GSA 17 (Adriatic Sea) |
Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) in GSA 17 (Adriatic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Spottail mantis squillid (Squilla mantis) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Spottail mantis squillid (Squilla mantis) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Spottail mantis squillid (Squilla mantis) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSA 17 (Northern Adriatic Sea) |
Poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
Poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
Poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) in GSA 17-18 (Adriatic Sea)
|
John dory (Zeus faber) in GSAs 17-18
|
John dory (Zeus faber) in GSAs 17-18
|
John dory (Zeus faber) in GSAs 17-18
|
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
National |
National |
National |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90/L90ref
|
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Value achieved upper |
1.08 |
0.98 |
2.78 |
2.91 |
0.86 |
2.92 |
1.03 |
1.08 |
4.46 |
0.99 |
1.0 |
1.03 |
0.89 |
0.99 |
1.06 |
1.05 |
1.03 |
1.16 |
1.03 |
3.95 |
0.9 |
0.81 |
1.07 |
1.07 |
1.23 |
0.91 |
1.11 |
1.21 |
0.93 |
2.46 |
1.08 |
0.95 |
0.32 |
1.71 |
0.94 |
0.82 |
0.36 |
0.45 |
1.39 |
1.02 |
0.88 |
1.27 |
1.02 |
0.63 |
1.85 |
1.2 |
1.78 |
3.75 |
0.05 |
1.23 |
1.3 |
0.82 |
1.47 |
0.87 |
1.65 |
0.39 |
1.37 |
0.29 |
1.14 |
0.75 |
0.95 |
1.07 |
8.96 |
0.99 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
1.74 |
0.44 |
0.47 |
0.26 |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Unknown |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregion MAD, the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows:
the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to L90ref, which represents the reference values estimated from sustainably exploited simulated populations (when available) or the average L90 during years when the stock was sustainably fished, defined as F < Fmsy. This method was used only if the number of years in which F < Fmsy constituted at least 40% of the historical series. In both cases, the average was calculated from 2016 to 2021. This parameter is denoted as L90/L90ref |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Trend feature |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule type criteria |
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
Integration rule description criteria |
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
GES extent threshold |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
NA |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |