Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D6 / Italy / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art8
Report due 2024-10-15
GES Descriptor D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State Italy
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
Report date 2025-09-11 10:38:38

MAD-IT-MS-AS

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Physical disturbance to seabed
Physical loss of the seabed
Element
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral mixed sediment
Circalittoral mixed sediment
Circalittoral mixed sediment
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral mixed sediment
Infralittoral mixed sediment
Infralittoral mixed sediment
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral sand
Infralittoral sand
Infralittoral sand
Littoral rock and biogenic reef
Littoral rock and biogenic reef
Littoral rock and biogenic reef
Littoral sediment
Littoral sediment
Littoral sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral sand
Offshore circalittoral sand
Offshore circalittoral sand
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Coralligenous habitat
Coralligenous habitat
Deep coral forests
Deep coral forests
Posidonia beds (Posidonion oceanicae)
Posidonia beds (Posidonion oceanicae)
Rhodolith beds
Rhodolith beds
White Corals
White Corals
Element extent
0.064700536
0.064700536
0.064700536
101.807661
101.807661
101.807661
15817.6378168
15817.6378168
15817.6378168
400.1723622
400.1723622
400.1723622
6866.511516
6866.511516
6866.511516
2.648658231
2.648658231
2.648658231
6.508797857
6.508797857
6.508797857
110.408651
110.408651
110.408651
388.1363433
388.1363433
388.1363433
1753.181585
1753.181585
1753.181585
6786.39425
6786.39425
6786.39425
14.63887446
14.63887446
14.63887446
22483.104771
22483.104771
22483.104771
1240.681347
1240.681347
1240.681347
6786.39425
6786.39425
6786.39425
Trend element
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Element 2
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C4
D6C5
D6C4
D6C5
D6C4
D6C5
D6C4
D6C5
D6C4
D6C5
D6C2
D6C1
Parameter
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
Habitat condition
EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED
Habitat condition
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
% coverage
Extent
Extent
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
MSFD
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Proportion threshold value
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
Proportion value achieved
100.0
99.990636
28.15
99.9659695
71.85
99.995765
36.81
99.991884
63.19
98.475479
100.0
99.824624
99.886623
99.788595
99.998632
100.0
28.15
99.9732635
71.85
99.99885
99.998632
12.5
50.0
47885.0
50.0
Proportion threshold value unit
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat achieving threshold value
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
extent in km2 of pressure
extent in km2 of pressure
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
No
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
No
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
No
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Yes
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
No
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. The extent of habitat adversely affected was calculated by assuming that a cell is adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criteria D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The extent of habitat adversely affected was calculated by assuming that a cell is adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. The extent of habitat adversely affected was calculated by assuming that a cell is adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criteria D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The extent of habitat adversely affected was calculated by assuming that a cell is adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""TrendParameter"""" and """"ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat
""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat
""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat
""""TrendParameter"""" and P""""arameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat
""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat
""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criteria D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The extent of habitat adversely affected was calculated by assuming that a cell is adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
""""ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values ​​higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)
Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
Extent; the """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because no threshold has been established for this criterion
Extent; the """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because no threshold has been established for this criterion
Related indicator
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C4_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C5_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C4_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C5_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C4_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C5_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C4_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C5_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C4_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6C5_HBO
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
  • MAD-IT-MS-AS-D6
Criteria status
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Not good
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Not good
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Not good
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Unknown
Good
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.""""Criteria status"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy do not report this habytat.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, resulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"Criteria status"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy do not report this habytat.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, resulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­ulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­sulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of loss of the habitat type, re­ulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
The extent of adverse effects from anthro­pogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its func­tions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural ex­tent of the habitat type in the assessment area.
Spatial extent and distribution of physical disturbance pressures on the seabed. """"CriteriaStatus"""" è """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unknown"""" the field """"ParameterAchieved"""" in Sheet5 (no treshould)
Spatial extent and distribution of physical loss (permanent change) of the natural seabed. """"CriteriaStatus"""" è """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unknown"""" the field """"ParameterAchieved"""" in Sheet5 (no treshould)
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
Source assessment feature
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Integration rule type parameter
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
GES extent achieved
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
GES extent unit
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Not relevant
Not relevant
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. In this Marine Reporting Unit the dataset analyzed is sufficient to express an evaluation in D6C5 only for 4 habitats (out of 17 habitat total). """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
GESachievedDate is """"Unknown"""", because there is not threshold. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
GESachievedDate is """"Unknown"""", because there is not threshold. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
  • MAD-IT-D01/D06-T001
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Test results
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct