Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D9 / Italy / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Reported by | ISPRA - Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research |
| Report date | 2020-10-01 |
| Report access | MSFD_2018_ART8_GES_IT_2020-07-31.xml |
Mediterranean Sea: Adriatic Sea (IT-AS-0001)
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Sum of PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element code |
CAS_50-32-8 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
EEA_33-58-9 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
EEA_33-62-5 |
SumDioxins |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
ICES
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Undefined
|
Element 2 |
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Merluccius merluccius; Mullus spp
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Merluccius merluccius; Mullus spp; Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Merluccius merluccius; Mullus spp
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Merluccius merluccius; Mullus spp
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Merluccius merluccius; Mullus spp; Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Element 2 code |
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 6.1.6 Reg 835/201
|
Cd 3.2.5 Reg.1881/2006
|
Cd 3.2.9 Reg.1881/2006
|
Dioxins and PCBs 5.3 Reg.1881/2006
|
Pb 3.1.5 Reg. 1881/2006
|
Pb 3.1.7 Reg. 1881/2006
|
Hg 3.3.2 Reg.1881/2006
|
Hg 3.3.1 Reg.1881/2006
|
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 6.1.6 Reg 835/201
|
Dioxins and PCBs 5.3 Reg.1881/2006
|
Element 2 code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-MU
|
CONC-B-MU
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
5.0 |
0.05 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
30.0 |
4.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.0493333333333333 |
0.001 |
0.148 |
0.7 |
0.03 |
0.67 |
0.28 |
0.07 |
0.288666666666667 |
0.4 |
Value achieved lower |
0.0133333333333333 |
0.001 |
0.068 |
0.7 |
0.02 |
0.238 |
0.029 |
0.022 |
0.0873333333333333 |
0.4 |
Value unit |
Other
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
Other
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
Value unit other |
μg/g ww
|
ng/g wet weight
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
22.22
|
16.67
|
22.22
|
16.67
|
16.67
|
22.22
|
16.67
|
22.22
|
22.22
|
16.67
|
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Benzo(a)pyrene in AS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in AS. So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in AS. So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related toDioxins and dioxins-like PCBs in AS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in AS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in AS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in AS. So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Metals in AS. So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Sum of benzo(a)pyrene, benz(a)anthracene, benzo(b)fluoranthene and chrysene in AS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
The percentage of covered area is not sufficient to assess the status related to Dioxins in AS . So, although the threshold value is achieved, it is not possible to indicate the status because of a low of cover percentage of data. |
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
Description overall status |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Comparing data to the IA phase, a qualitative improvement is generally observed, although the current coverage percentages are lower. Concerning to metals, exceedances were not recorded, while in IA they were found in all three subregion.
Concerning to HOCs no exceedances were recorded, confirming the past IA. |
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|