Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D3 / Italy / Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea |
| Report date | 2025-09-11 10:38:38 |
MIC-IT-MS-ISCMS
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Boops boops |
Boops boops |
Boops boops |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus annularis |
Diplodus vulgaris |
Diplodus vulgaris |
Diplodus vulgaris |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone moschata |
Eledone moschata |
Eledone moschata |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Illex coindetii |
Illex coindetii |
Illex coindetii |
Lepidopus caudatus |
Lepidopus caudatus |
Lepidopus caudatus |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Pagellus acarne |
Pagellus acarne |
Pagellus acarne |
Pagellus erythrinus |
Pagellus erythrinus |
Pagellus erythrinus |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Scorpaena scrofa |
Scorpaena scrofa |
Scorpaena scrofa |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Squilla mantis |
Squilla mantis |
Squilla mantis |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 12-13-14-15-16-21w |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 12-13-14-15-16-21w |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Bogue (Boops boops) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily)
|
Bogue (Boops boops) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily)
|
Bogue (Boops boops) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily)
|
Tub gurnard (Chelidonichthys lucerna) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Tub gurnard (Chelidonichthys lucerna) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Tub gurnard (Chelidonichthys lucerna) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Annular seabream (Diplodus annularis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Annular seabream (Diplodus annularis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Annular seabream (Diplodus annularis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common two-banded seabream (Diplodus vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common two-banded seabream (Diplodus vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common two-banded seabream (Diplodus vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Musky octopus (Eledone moschata) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Musky octopus (Eledone moschata) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Musky octopus (Eledone moschata) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Silver scabbardfish (Lepidopus caudatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Silver scabbardfish (Lepidopus caudatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Silver scabbardfish (Lepidopus caudatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
European squid (Loligo vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
European squid (Loligo vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
European squid (Loligo vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSAs 12-13-14-15-16
|
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSAs 12-13-14-15-16
|
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Axillary seabream (Pagellus acarne) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Axillary seabream (Pagellus acarne) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Axillary seabream (Pagellus acarne) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Deep-water rose shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) in GSAs 12-13-14-15-16 |
Deep-water rose shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) in GSAs 12-13-14-15-16 |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Red scorpionfish (Scorpaena scrofa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Red scorpionfish (Scorpaena scrofa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Red scorpionfish (Scorpaena scrofa) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Spottail mantis squillid (Squilla mantis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Spottail mantis squillid (Squilla mantis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Spottail mantis squillid (Squilla mantis) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSA 16 (Southern Sicily) |
Element source |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Value achieved upper |
1.29 |
0.68 |
2.01 |
0.43 |
0.84 |
1.13 |
0.22 |
0.62 |
1.25 |
0.79 |
0.58 |
1.3 |
0.48 |
0.25 |
1.52 |
2.06 |
0.1 |
0.86 |
2.17 |
0.25 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.88 |
1.0 |
1.86 |
0.66 |
0.82 |
1.08 |
0.8 |
1.47 |
0.19 |
1.41 |
0.84 |
0.45 |
1.39 |
0.85 |
0.83 |
1.06 |
0.93 |
0.8 |
0.99 |
1.8 |
0.28 |
0.97 |
2.62 |
1.37 |
0.79 |
1.81 |
0.39 |
0.59 |
0.59 |
1.36 |
0.86 |
0.63 |
0.59 |
1.12 |
0.79 |
0.88 |
1.05 |
0.7 |
0.83 |
0.16 |
0.85 |
0.35 |
1.67 |
1.05 |
0.94 |
0.61 |
1.12 |
1.21 |
1.77 |
0.51 |
0.48 |
0.76 |
0.65 |
|||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Trend feature |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule type criteria |
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
Integration rule description criteria |
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
GES extent threshold |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |