Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D3 / Italy / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea |
| Report date | 2025-09-11 10:38:38 |
MWE-IT-MS-WMS
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristaeomorpha foliacea |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Boops boops |
Boops boops |
Boops boops |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Eledone cirrhosa |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Illex coindetii |
Illex coindetii |
Illex coindetii |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus barbatus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagellus erythrinus |
Pagellus erythrinus |
Pagellus erythrinus |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Phycis blennoides |
Phycis blennoides |
Phycis blennoides |
Raja asterias |
Raja asterias |
Raja asterias |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus mediterraneus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trisopterus minutus |
Trisopterus minutus |
Trisopterus minutus |
Zeus faber |
Zeus faber |
Zeus faber |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 9-10-11 |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 9-10-11 |
Giant red shrimp (Aristaemorpha foliacea) in GSAs 9-10-11 |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSAs 9-10-11 |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSAs 9-10-11 |
Blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GSAs 9-10-11 |
Bogue (Boops boops) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Bogue (Boops boops) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Bogue (Boops boops) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Horned octopus (Eledone cirrhosa) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and Northern Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and Northern Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and Northern Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GSAs 9-10-11
|
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 10 (Southern and Central Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 10 (Southern and Central Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in GSA 10 (Southern and Central Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and North Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and North Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and North Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Deep-water rose shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Deep-water rose shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Mediterranean starry ray (Raja asterias) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Mediterranean starry ray (Raja asterias) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Mediterranean starry ray (Raja asterias) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and North Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and North Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Sardine (Sardina Pilchardus) in GSA 9 (Ligurian Sea and North Tyrrhenian Sea) |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11 |
Poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
John dory (Zeus faber) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
John dory (Zeus faber) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
John dory (Zeus faber) in GSAs 8-9-10-11
|
Element source |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
STECF |
STECF |
STECF |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Fcurr/Fref
|
SSBcurr/SSBref
|
L90%/L90inf
|
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
<= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Value achieved upper |
1.62 |
0.85 |
0.77 |
3.16 |
0.85 |
0.51 |
1.44 |
0.88 |
2.33 |
0.43 |
0.61 |
0.45 |
1.92 |
0.99 |
1.69 |
0.63 |
0.64 |
0.59 |
1.36 |
0.76 |
1.54 |
0.7 |
0.59 |
4.26 |
0.07 |
0.38 |
1.43 |
0.16 |
1.13 |
0.27 |
1.06 |
1.56 |
0.59 |
0.71 |
2.6 |
0.37 |
0.72 |
1.28 |
0.75 |
0.64 |
0.78 |
1.17 |
0.48 |
0.52 |
1.52 |
0.51 |
0.96 |
1.16 |
2.12 |
0.46 |
0.73 |
2.5 |
0.31 |
0.97 |
1.56 |
0.64 |
0.62 |
0.19 |
1.57 |
1.05 |
1.12 |
1.0 |
0.86 |
0.45 |
1.63 |
0.78 |
0.61 |
1.38 |
0.8 |
2.12 |
0.41 |
0.62 |
0.99 |
1.02 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
Adimensional
|
|||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C1 was calculated as the average of the ratio of Fcurr (current fishing mortality) to Fref (fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as Fcurr/Fref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
The parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C2 was calculated as the average of the ratio of SSB (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock) to SSBref (Spawning stock biomass or Biomass of the stock at maximum sustainable yield, MSY, or its proxy) over the years 2016-2021. This parameter is denoted as SSBcurr/SSBref (avg 6 yrs, '16-'21). The parameter was estimated when at least 4 out of 6 years data were available. |
For the subregions MWE and MIC the parameter used to assess the status of individual stocks according to criterion D3C3 was calculated as follows: the average ratio of L90 (the length at the 90th percentile of the size structure) to Linf (the length that fish in a population would reach if they grew indefinitely) over the years 2016-2021, compared to the expected value of 0.8. This parameter is denoted as L90%/Linf |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
High confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments validated at the international level (STECF or GFCM). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
Low confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C1. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods relying only on fisheries-independent data (AMSY). |
Medium confidence level in the stock status according to criterion D3C2. The parameter used to assess the stock status was based on the outcomes of assessments performed using “data-limited” methods based either on fisheries-independent data only (AMSY) or on both fisheries-dependent and fisheries-independent data (CMSY, BSM, SPiCT, etc.). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Trend feature |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule type criteria |
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
TREE
|
Integration rule description criteria |
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
EU (MSFD CIS D3)
|
GES extent threshold |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |