MS/Art8-2024/2024/D6/Italy/Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D6 / Italy / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art8
Report due	2024-10-15
GES Descriptor	D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State	Italy
Region/subregion	Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
Report date	2025-09-11 10:38:38

MWE-IT-MS-WMS

Simplified table

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6
Feature	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Other benthic habitats	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Element	Abyssal	Abyssal	Abyssal	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral sand	Circalittoral sand	Circalittoral sand	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral sand	Infralittoral sand	Infralittoral sand	Littoral rock and biogenic reef	Littoral rock and biogenic reef	Littoral rock and biogenic reef	Littoral sediment	Littoral sediment	Littoral sediment	Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal sediment	Lower bathyal sediment	Lower bathyal sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Coralligenous habitat	Coralligenous habitat	Deep coral forests	Deep coral forests	Posidonia beds (Posidonion oceanicae)	Posidonia beds (Posidonion oceanicae)	Rhodolith beds	Rhodolith beds	White Corals	White Corals
Element extent	97463.06931	97463.06931	97463.06931	1683.837415	1683.837415	1683.837415	55.0017121	55.0017121	55.0017121	7903.974795	7903.974795	7903.974795	768.0563881	768.0563881	768.0563881	9974.474712	9974.474712	9974.474712	489.3227699	489.3227699	489.3227699	3.172861367	3.172861367	3.172861367	330.1364719	330.1364719	330.1364719	3195.873076	3195.873076	3195.873076	2381.317432	2381.317432	2381.317432							14.26420736	14.26420736	14.26420736	85618.28	85618.28	85618.28	22.35901852	22.35901852	22.35901852	40.72832004	40.72832004	40.72832004	11836.547851	11836.547851	11836.547851	76.28860899	76.28860899	76.28860899	3477.660347	3477.660347	3477.660347	14.26420736	14.26420736	14.26420736	85618.28	85618.28	85618.28
Trend element	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Element 2
Element source	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C4	D6C5	D6C4	D6C5	D6C4	D6C5	D6C4	D6C5	D6C4	D6C5	D6C2	D6C1
Parameter	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	Habitat condition	EXTENT-NOT-AFFECTED	Habitat condition	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	% coverage	Extent	Extent
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator	<=		<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=	<=
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD	MSFD
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Proportion threshold value		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0		2.0	25.0	2.0	25.0	2.0	25.0	2.0	25.0	2.0	25.0	2.0	25.0
Proportion value achieved		99.998036			99.988987			99.999753			99.993238			99.994846			99.989947			99.804621			99.740254			99.945746			99.966259			99.770854									99.999956			99.9981435			99.996975			100.0			99.996015			99.99809			99.99613			99.999956			99.9981435			74.4		66.6		13.1		43.0		50.0	80659.0	109.0
Proportion threshold value unit	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat achieving threshold value	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	% area of habitat adversely affected	extent in km2 of pressure	extent in km2 of pressure
Trend parameter	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Yes	No	Yes	No	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	No	Yes	No	Unknown	Unknown
Description parameter	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat	""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat	""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat	""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habitat	""""TrendParameter"""" and ParameterAchieved"""" are both """"not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	ParameterAchieved is """"Unknown"""" because for D6C3 there is not threshold, neither at European nor at national level; """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different evaluation methods were used in previous reporting. Furthermore, the lack of data did not even allow to identify extent of habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure (a cell is considered adversely affected for SAR values higher than those corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve)	Parameter represents extent (%) of habitat not affected by physical loss. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	The results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. The """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because the lack of data did not even allow to identify value corresponding to the 33rd percentile of the SAR/RBS curve, above which to calculate the extent of the habitat adversely affected by abrasion pressure. """"TrendParameter"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used											Extent; the """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because no threshold has been established for this criterion	Extent; the """"ParameterAchieved"""" is """"Unknown"""" because no threshold has been established for this criterion
Related indicator	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C4_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C5_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C4_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C5_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C4_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C5_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C4_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C5_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C4_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6C5_HBO	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6	MWE-IT-MS-WMS-D6
Criteria status	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown
Description criteria	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	The extent of loss of the habitat type, resulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	The extent of loss of the habitat type, resulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area. """"CriteriaStatus"""" is """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of loss of the habitat type, reulting from anthropogenic pressures, does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.	The extent of adverse effects from anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including alteration to its biotic and abiotic structure and its functions , does not exceed a specified proportion of the natural extent of the habitat type in the assessment area.											Spatial extent and distribution of physical disturbance pressures on the seabed. """"CriteriaStatus"""" è """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unknown"""" the field """"ParameterAchieved"""" in Sheet5 (no treshould)	Spatial extent and distribution of physical loss (permanent change) of the natural seabed. """"CriteriaStatus"""" è """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unknown"""" the field """"ParameterAchieved"""" in Sheet5 (no treshould)
Element status	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element																																		""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat	""""ElementStatus"""" and """"TrendElement"""" are both """"Not assessed"""" because the official maps used by Italy (Euseamap) do not report this habytat
Source assessment feature	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Reporting method feature	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D
Trend feature	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Integration rule type parameter	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO											Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold																																																																			75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Not relevant	Not relevant
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	GESachievedDate è Unknown, due to lack of data. In particular, the results of assessment of criterion D6C3 and D6C4 contribute to the evaluation of criterion D6C5. Since the abrasion pressure (assessed in D6C3) was found to be significantly higher than the physical loss pressure (assessed in D6C4), for the assessment of D6C5 was considered exclusively to the results of the assessment relating to D6C3. Although it was possible to calculate the extent of the habitats adversely affected by abrasion pressure, considering the bathymetric development of the habitats, for this Marine Reporting Unit the analyzed dataset is never sufficient to express an assessment in D6C5. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because is """"Unkown"""" """"TrendElement""""	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	GESachievedDate is """"Unknown"""", because there is not threshold. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used	GESachievedDate is """"Unknown"""", because there is not threshold. """"TrendFeature"""" is """"Unknown"""" because different calculation methods in previous reports were used
Assessments period	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021
Related pressures	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001	MWE-IT-D01/D06-T001
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Test results	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	False	False	False	Correct	Correct