Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D4 / Lithuania / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Lithuania |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2020-06-09 |
Report access | ART9_GES_LT-04-08-corrected-06-03.xml |
GES component |
D4
|
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C3
|
D4C3
|
D4C4
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Features |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GES description |
Anthropogenic pressures do not adversely affect the diversity (species composition and relative abundance of species) of the trophic guild. The condition is assessed according to the indicator “Seasonal change of dominant phytoplankton groups”.
|
Anthropogenic pressures do not adversely affect the overall abundance balance in all trophic guilds. The indicator “Abundance of meso-predatory fish” is used to assess the condition.
|
Anthropogenic pressures do not adversely affect the overall abundance balance in all trophic guilds. The indicator “Fish Community Abundance Index (Predator Abundance)” is used to assess the status (also used for criterion D1C3).
|
Anthropogenic pressures do not adversely affect the size distribution of individuals across the trophic guild. The indicator "Fish Community Size Index" (also used for criterion D1C3) is used to assess the status.
|
Anthropogenic pressures do not adversely affect the size distribution of individuals across the trophic guild. The indicator "Zooplankton average size and total abundance" is used to assess the status.
|
||
Determination date |
202002 |
202002 |
201304 |
201304 |
202002 |
||
Update type |
New determination |
New determination |
Same as last reported determination |
Same as last reported determination |
New determination |
||
Justification for non-use of criterion |
|||||||
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements |