Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D6 / Latvia / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology |
| Report date | 2013-04-30 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20130430_215739.xml |
BAL- LV- AA- 001, BAL- LV- AA- 002, BAL- LV- AA- 003, BAL- LV- AA- 004, BAL- LV- AA- 005, BAL- LV- AA- 006, BAL- LV- AA- 007, BAL- LV- AA- 008, BAL- LV- AA- 009, BAL- LV- AA- 012
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D6 |
1.6.1-indicator 1.6A |
1.6.2-indicator 5.2B |
1.6.3-indicator 1.6A |
1.6.3-indicator 5.1A |
1.6.3-indicator 5.1B |
1.6.3-indicator 5.2A |
1.6.3-indicator 5.2C |
6.2.1-indicator 1.6A |
6.2.2-indicator 1.6A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method used |
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
Description [Targets] |
Jūras dibena integritāte ir līmenī, kas nodrošina, ka ekosistēmu struktūras un funkcijas ir nosargātas un jo īpaši bentiskās ekosistēmas nav nelabvēlīgi iespaidotas.
|
The BQI index is based on the composition of benthic fauna species (proportion of sensitive and tolerant species), the number of species and the number of individuals in a given species, thus achieving GES when the diversity and abundance of benthic invertebrates is beyond levels associated with contaminated conditions.
|
GES is achieved when the phytoplankton biomass is outside the levels associated with contaminated conditions.
|
The BQI index is based on the composition of benthic fauna species (proportion of sensitive and tolerant species), the number of species and the number of individuals in a given species, thus achieving GES when the diversity and abundance of benthic invertebrates is beyond levels associated with contaminated conditions.
|
GES is achieved when nutrient concentrations in the aquifer correspond to physiographic, geographic and climatic conditions specific to the site and changes in these nutrient concentrations do not result in an adverse direct or indirect increase in nutrients
|
GES is achieved when nutrient concentrations in the aquifer correspond to physiographic, geographic and climatic conditions specific to the site and changes in these nutrient concentrations do not result in an adverse direct or indirect increase in nutrients
|
The GES level will be reached if the chlorophyll concentrations correspond to the GES water transparency levels.
|
GES tiek sasniegts, ja ūdens caurspīdība atbilst dabiskajiem aļģu ziedēšanas un augšanas apstākļiem un šo apstākļu izmaiņas nerada nelabvēlīgu ūdens caurspīdības samazināšanos.
|
The BQI index is based on the composition of benthic fauna species (proportion of sensitive and tolerant species), the number of species and the number of individuals in a given species, thus achieving GES when the diversity and abundance of benthic invertebrates is beyond levels associated with contaminated conditions.
|
The BQI index is based on the composition of benthic fauna species (proportion of sensitive and tolerant species), the number of species and the number of individuals in a given species, thus achieving GES when the diversity and abundance of benthic invertebrates is beyond levels associated with contaminated conditions.
|
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
||||||||||
Reference point type |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Baseline |
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Proportion |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Assessment method |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Development status |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
Type of target/indicator |
State |
State |
State |
State |
State |
State |
State |
State |
State |
State |
Timescale |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
Interim or GES target |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Physical/chemical features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Predominant habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Functional group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|