Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-B / Malta / Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Birds |
Member State | Malta |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea |
Reported by | Environment and Resources Authority |
Report date | 2020-04-16 |
Report access | ART8_GES.xml |
Fisheries Management Zone (MIC-MT-MS-01)
GES component |
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Element |
Calonectris diomedea |
Calonectris diomedea |
Calonectris diomedea |
Hydrobates pelagicus |
Hydrobates pelagicus |
Hydrobates pelagicus |
Puffinus yelkouan |
Puffinus yelkouan |
Puffinus yelkouan |
Element code |
137194 |
137194 |
137194 |
137189 |
137189 |
137189 |
137204 |
137204 |
137204 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||
Element source |
BARCON |
BARCON |
BARCON |
BARCON |
BARCON |
BARCON |
BARCON |
BARCON |
BARCON |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Parameter other |
Abundance (breeding pairs)
|
Breeding pairs
|
Abundance (breeding pairs)
|
||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Stable trend
|
Threshold value source |
|||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||
Value achieved upper |
3605.0 |
8460.0 |
2635.0 |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
2670.0 |
1795.0 |
|||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
||||||
Value unit other |
Breeding pairs
|
Breeding pairs
|
Breeding pairs
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes, based on low risk |
No |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes, based on low risk |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Trend data indicates possible decline in Scopoli's shearwater water breeding population. This needs to be followed through further systematic scientific monitoring in order to be confirmed. |
||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||
Criteria status |
Good, based on low risk |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good |
Good, based on low risk |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
Assessment based on expert judgement
|
Assessment based on trends in population abundance |
Assessment based on breeding range
|
Assessment based on trends in population abundance |
Assessment based on breeding range
|
Assessment based on expert judgement
|
Assessment based on trends in population abundance |
Assessment based on breeding range
|
|
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
|||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
|||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Despite the fact that methodologies for the integration of criteria is still to be agreed at Union level, the status of each species was deemed as good/stable, based on expert interpretation of reported trends.
The overall achievement of GES for seabirds was also concluded on the basis of expert advice, based on the reported trends.
The 'GES Extent Threshold' is yet to be determined for MT, and so 'GES extent achieved' is not assessed. |
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|