Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D1-P / Malta / Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2012-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Pelagic habitats
Member State Malta
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
Reported by Malta Environment and Planning Authority
Report date 2013-08-02
Report access MSFD8aFeatures_20131105_121510.xml

MIC-MT-MS

Topic
HabitatCondition
HabitatDistribution
HabitatExtent
HabitatOverall
Reporting Feature
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows)
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows)
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows)
Seagrass habitat (predominantly Posidonia oceanica meadows)
Indicator
1.6.1
1.4.1
1.5.1
Threshold Value
Ecological Quality Ratio based on the PREI index >0.6
No significant changes in distirbutional range for the past ten years
Changes to the extent of P. oceanica meadows due to anthropogenic disturbance are estimated at less than 10% of the current extent.
All criteria assessed are indicative of good status; None of the criteria are indicative of poor status.
Threshold Unit
Ratio
Trend
Percentage
Ratio
Threshold Proportion
Baseline
Reference conditions identified through the WFD 2012 monitoring
Distributional range of P. oceanica as indicated by the 2002 baseline survey and supplemented by more recent localised data (as aggregated for the purposes of the MSFD).
Extent of P. oceanica as compiled in 2002 baseline survey and supplemented by more recent localised data (as aggregated for the purposes of the MSFD).
Distributional range and extent based on 2002 survey as supplemented by more recent localised data, and reference conditions as identified through 2012 WFD monitoring.
Status
Good
Good
Good
Good
Status Description
Status Trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Status Confidence
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Topic
FuncGroupAbundance
FuncGroupCondition
FuncGroupAbundance
FuncGroupCondition
FuncGroupOverall
FuncGroupAbundance
FuncGroupCondition
FuncGroupAbundance
FuncGroupCondition
FuncGroupOverall
FuncGroupAbundance
FuncGroupCondition
FuncGroupOverall
Reporting Feature
Offshore pelagic-feeding birds
Offshore pelagic-feeding birds
Turtles
Turtles
Turtles
Mammals
Mammals
Demersal elasmobranchs
Demersal elasmobranchs
Demersal elasmobranchs
Demersal fish
Demersal fish
Demersal fish
Indicator
GESOther
GESOther
1.6.1
1.6.1
1.6.1
1.6.1
1.6.1
Threshold Value
Species composition is in line with the composition of marine reptiles in the Mediterranean region
Species composition is in line with the composition of marine reptiles in the Mediterranean region
Good status: Species composition in Malta reflects species composition at a regional level.
Species composition in annual samples is stable
Species composition in annual samples is stable
Threshold Unit
Threshold Proportion
Baseline
Historic records
Historic records
Records of cetaceans in Malta since 1960
MEDITS data for the period 2007-2012
MEDITS data for the period 2005-2012
Status
NotAssessed
NotAssessed
NotAssessed
Good
Good
NotAssessed
Good
NotAssessed
Good
NotAssessed
NotAssessed
Good
NotAssessed
Status Description
In view of current limitations in available data
In view of current limitations in available data
Given that a single species is representing this functional group, status in terms of relative abundance is not deemed relevant. On the other hand, reference is being made to the assessment of characteristics for Caretta caretta
Due to limited abundance estimates as well as lack of reference conditions
Due to limited knowledge on ecosystem functions to which the outcome of the analysis of relative biomass can be related
Since the assessment of this functional group should be undertaken in relation to ecosystem functions, which due to current data limitations, could not be udertaken at this stage
Due to limited knowledge on ecosystem functions to which the outcome of the analysis of relative biomass can be related
Since the assessment of this functional group should be undertaken in relation to ecosystem functions, which due to current data limitations, could not be udertaken at this stage
Status Trend
Unknown_NotAssessed
Unknown_NotAssessed
Unknown_NotAssessed
Stable
Stable
Unknown_NotAssessed
Stable
Unknown_NotAssessed
Stable
Unknown_NotAssessed
Unknown_NotAssessed
Stable
Unknown_NotAssessed
Status Confidence
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Low