Member State report / Art9 / 2012 / D2 / Malta / Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D2 Non-indigenous species |
Member State | Malta |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea |
Reported by | Malta Environment and Planning Authority |
Report date | - |
Report access | MSFD9GES_20131105_121546.xml |
GES component |
D2
|
2.1 Abundance and state characterisation of non-indigenous species, in particular invasive species |
2.1.1 Trends in abundance of NIS |
2.2 Environmental impact of invasive non-indigenous species |
2.2.1 Ratio invasive to native species |
2.2.2 Impacts of NIS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method used |
MIC-MT-MS: The Good Environmental Status identified for each descriptor constitutes a qualitative description of the desired status. For some descriptors, more than one statement is being proposed, to reflect the MSFD criteria and indicators. Reference to existing environmental thresholds/limits was made in relation to Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 9 (contaminants in fish and seafood), however no quantitative GES is being put forward for the first reporting cycle. |
MIC-MT-MS: The Good Environmental Status identified for each descriptor constitutes a qualitative description of the desired status. For some descriptors, more than one statement is being proposed, to reflect the MSFD criteria and indicators. Reference to existing environmental thresholds/limits was made in relation to Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 9 (contaminants in fish and seafood), however no quantitative GES is being put forward for the first reporting cycle. |
MIC-MT-MS: The Good Environmental Status identified for each descriptor constitutes a qualitative description of the desired status. For some descriptors, more than one statement is being proposed, to reflect the MSFD criteria and indicators. Reference to existing environmental thresholds/limits was made in relation to Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 9 (contaminants in fish and seafood), however no quantitative GES is being put forward for the first reporting cycle. |
|||
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feature |
|
|
|
|||
Criterion/indicator |
D2 |
2.1 |
2.1.1 |
2.2 |
2.2.1 |
2.2.2 |
GES description |
The introduction and establishment of new invasive non-indigenous species as a result of human activities is in so far as practicable prevented. |
The introduction and establishment of new invasive non-indigenous species as a result of human activities is in so far as practicable prevented. |
||||
Threshold values |
||||||
Threshold value unit |
||||||
Proportion of area to achieve threshold value |
Assessment Areas |
Assessment Areas |
Assessment areas |
|||
Reference point type |
||||||
Baseline |
Number of invasive non-indigenous species currently present in Maltese waters |
Number of invasive non-indigenous species currently present in Maltese waters |
Number of invasive non-indigenous species currently present in Maltese waters |
|||
Assessment method |
Number of documented invasive non-indigenous species (to be confirmed by the MSFD monitoring programme). |
Number of documented invasive non-indigenous species (to be confirmed by the MSFD monitoring programme). |
||||
Development status |
Achievement of this GES would require sound knowledge with respect to the number of invasive non-indigenous species and links to human activities , which knowledge is currently limited. Further knowledge is thus needed and this GES is expected to be operational by 2018 (if adopted). |
Achievement of this GES would require sound knowledge with respect to the number of invasive non-indigenous species and links to human activities , which knowledge is currently limited. Further knowledge is thus needed and this GES is expected to be operational by 2018 (if adopted). |
Justification for not adressing the Descriptor/Criterion:
The MSFD Initial Assessment on NIS clearly indicates that with the exception of recently published literature on two non-indigenous species, the current data scenario with respect to NIS impacts is very limited, thus limiting the determination of Good Environmental Status in relation to criterion 2.2 (Environmental Impact of Invasive non-indigenous species). Determination of GES on NIS impacts based on the current data scenario would be premature. Such GES should be determined as soon as knowledge of NIS impacts is adequate enough to allow articulation of a realistic desirable state with respect to levels of NIS impacts. |