MS/Art8-2024/2024/D1-F/Netherlands/NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-F / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art8
Report due	2024-10-15
GES Descriptor	D1 Fish
Member State	Netherlands
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report date	2026-04-10 12:40:24

Nederlands Continentaal Plat vanaf de basislijn (0 mijl) (ANS-NL-MS-1)

Simplified table

Regional assessment area	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
Component MRUs
GES component	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F	D1F
Feature	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Coastal fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Demersal shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish	Pelagic shelf fish
Element	Alosa spp.	Alosa spp.	Alosa spp.	Alosa spp.	Anguilla anguilla	Cyclopterus lumpus	Dicentrarchus labrax	Dicentrarchus labrax	Lampetra fluviatilis	Lampetra fluviatilis	Lampetra fluviatilis	Lampetra fluviatilis	Petromyzon marinus	Petromyzon marinus	Petromyzon marinus	Petromyzon marinus	Pollachius pollachius	Pollachius pollachius	Pollachius pollachius	Pollachius pollachius	Pollachius pollachius	Pollachius pollachius	Raja undulata	Salmo trutta trutta	Zoarces viviparus	Amblyraja radiata	Amblyraja radiata	Amblyraja radiata	Amblyraja radiata	Amblyraja radiata	Anarhichas lupus	Chelidonichthys cuculus	Chelidonichthys lucerna	Conger conger	Dasyatis pastinaca	Dipturus oxyrinchus	Dipturus spp.	Eutrigla gurnardus	Gadus morhua	Gadus morhua	Gadus morhua	Galeorhinus galeus	Galeorhinus galeus	Galeorhinus galeus	Galeorhinus galeus	Galeorhinus galeus	Glyptocephalus cynoglossus	Helicolenus dactylopterus	Hippoglossus hippoglossus	Lepidorhombus boscii	Lepidorhombus spp.	Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis	Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis	Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis	Leucoraja circularis	Leucoraja fullonica	Leucoraja fullonica	Leucoraja fullonica	Leucoraja fullonica	Leucoraja fullonica	Leucoraja naevus	Leucoraja naevus	Leucoraja naevus	Leucoraja naevus	Leucoraja naevus	Limanda limanda	Lophius budegassa	Lophius budegassa	Lophius budegassa	Lophius budegassa, Lophius piscatorius	Lophius piscatorius	Lophius piscatorius	Lophius piscatorius	Melanogrammus aeglefinus	Melanogrammus aeglefinus	Merlangius merlangus	Merlangius merlangus	Merlangius merlangus	Merluccius merluccius	Microstomus kitt	Mullus surmuletus	Mullus surmuletus	Mustelus asterias	Mustelus spp.	Phycis blennoides	Phycis blennoides	Phycis blennoides	Phycis blennoides	Phycis blennoides	Platichthys flesus	Pleuronectes platessa	Pleuronectes platessa	Pleuronectes platessa	Pleuronectes platessa	Pleuronectes platessa	Pollachius virens	Raja brachyura	Raja brachyura	Raja brachyura	Raja brachyura	Raja brachyura	Raja brachyura	Raja clavata	Raja clavata	Raja clavata	Raja clavata	Raja clavata	Raja clavata	Raja microocellata	Raja microocellata	Raja microocellata	Raja microocellata	Raja microocellata	Raja montagui	Raja montagui	Raja montagui	Raja montagui	Raja montagui	Raja montagui	Raja montagui	Raja undulata	Rajidae (Batoidea)	Rajidae (Batoidea)	Scophthalmus maximus	Scophthalmus maximus	Scophthalmus rhombus	Scophthalmus rhombus	Scophthalmus rhombus	Scophthalmus rhombus	Scophthalmus rhombus	Scyliorhinus canicula	Scyliorhinus canicula	Scyliorhinus canicula	Scyliorhinus canicula	Scyliorhinus canicula	Scyliorhinus canicula	Scyliorhinus stellaris	Scyliorhinus stellaris	Scyliorhinus stellaris	Scyliorhinus stellaris	Scyliorhinus stellaris	Sebastes spp.	Sebastes viviparus	Solea solea	Solea solea	Solea solea	Solea solea	Solea solea	Squalus acanthias	Trisopterus esmarkii	Ammodytes spp.	Ammodytes spp.	Ammodytes spp.	Ammodytes spp.	Ammodytes spp.	Ammodytes spp.	Ammodytes spp.	Cetorhinus maximus	Cetorhinus maximus	Cetorhinus maximus	Clupea harengus	Clupea harengus	Clupea harengus	Micromesistius poutassou	Sardina pilchardus	Scomber scombrus	Sparus aurata	Sprattus sprattus	Sprattus sprattus	Trachurus trachurus	Trachurus trachurus
Element extent
Trend element	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Element 2							Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 4.b-c, 7.a, and 7.d-h (central and southern North Sea, Irish Sea, English Channel, Bristol Channel, and Celtic Sea)	Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 6.a, 7.b, and 7.j (West of Scotland, West of Ireland, eastern part of southwest of Ireland)													Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in subareas 6-7 (Celtic Seas and the English Channel)								Starry ray (Amblyraja radiata) in subareas 2 and 4, and Division 3.a (Norwegian Sea, North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)		Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in subareas 3-8 (Northeast Atlantic)					Common skate complex (Blue skate (Dipturus batis) and flapper skate (Dipturus intermedius)) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Grey gurnard (Eutrigla gurnardus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, Division 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak)	Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 21 (Kattegat)	Cod (Gadus morhua) in divisions 7.e-k (eastern English Channel and southern Celtic Seas)					Tope shark (Galeorhinus galeus) in subareas 1-10, 12 and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Witch (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)			Four-spot megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii) in divisions 7.b-k, 8.a-b, and 8.d (west and southwest of Ireland, Bay of Biscay)	Megrim (Lepidorhombus spp.) in divisions 4.a and 6.a (northern North Sea, West of Scotland)			Megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis) in divisions 7.b-k, 8.a-b, and 8.d (west and southwest of Ireland, Bay of Biscay)						Shagreen ray (Leucoraja fullonica) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland, southern Celtic Seas, and English Channel)					Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)			Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in Subarea 7 and divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (Celtic Seas, Bay of Biscay)	Anglerfish (Lophius budegassa, Lophius piscatorius) in subareas 4 and 6, and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)			White anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) in Subarea 7 and divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (Celtic Seas, Bay of Biscay)	Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak)	Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b-k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel)	Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel)	Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b-c and 7.e-k (southern Celtic Seas and eastern English Channel)	European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7, and divisions 3.a, 8.a-b and 8.d, Northern stock (Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, and the northern Bay of Biscay)	Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)	Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in subareas 6 and 8, and divisions 7.a-c, 7.e-k, and 9.a (North Sea, Bay of Biscay, southern Celtic Seas, and Atlantic Iberian waters)	Smooth-hound (Mustelus spp.) in subareas 1-10, 12 and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)						Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in subareas 1–10, 12, and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel)	Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.e (western English Channel)	Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) and Subdivision 20 (Skagerrak)	Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in divisions 7.b-c (West of Ireland)	Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 21-23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound)	Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)					Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in Subarea 6 and Division 4.a (North Sea and West of Scotland)	Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in divisions 7.a and 7.f-g (Irish Sea, Bristol Channel, Celtic Sea North)					Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Division 7.e (western English Channel)	Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Subarea 4 and in divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak, Kattegat, and eastern English Channel)					Small-eyed ray (Raja microocellata) in divisions 7.f and 7.g (Bristol Channel, Celtic Sea North)					Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak, Kattegat, and eastern English Channel)	Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Subarea 6 and divisions 7.b and 7.j (West of Scotland, west and southwest of Ireland)	Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in divisions 7.a and 7.e-h (southern Celtic Seas and western English Channel)	Undulate ray (Raja undulata) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel)	Other rays and skates (Rajidae) in Subarea 4 and in divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak, Kattegat, and eastern English Channel)	Other rays and skates (Rajidae) in Subarea 6 and divisions 7.a-c and 7.e-k (Rockall, West of Scotland, Celtic Sea and western English Channel)	Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)					Brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d-e (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, English Channel)					Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)	Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in Subarea 6 and divisions 7.a-c and 7.e-j (West of Scotland, Irish Sea, southern Celtic Seas)					Greater-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus stellaris) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland, southern Celtic Sea, and the English Channel)			Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel)	Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.e (western English Channel)	Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)	Sole (Solea solea) in divisions 7.b-c (West of Ireland)	Sole (Solea solea) in subdivisions 20-24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea)	Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in subareas 1-10, 12 and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)	Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Division 4.a, Sandeel Area 5r (northern North Sea, Viking and Bergen banks)	Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Division 4.a, Sandeel Area 7r (northern North Sea, Shetland)	Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.a and 4.b, Sandeel Area 4 (northern and central North Sea)	Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.a and 4.b, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 3r (Skagerrak, northern and central North Sea)	Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank)	Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea)	Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in subdivisions 20-22, Sandeel Area 6 (Kattegat)			Basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) in subareas 1-10, 12 and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)	Herring (Clupea harengus) in subareas 1, 2, 5 and divisions 4.a and 14.a, Norwegian spring-spawning herring (the Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean)	Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic)	Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1-9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)	Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in Subarea 7 (Southern Celtic Seas, English Channel)	Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)		Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a and Subarea 4 (Skagerrak, Kattegat and North Sea)	Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel)	Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a, 4.a, 5.b, 6.a, 7.a-c and 7.e-k (the Northeast Atlantic)	Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in divisions 3.a, 4.b-c, and 7.d (Skagerrak and Kattegat, southern and central North Sea, eastern English Channel)
Element source	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR
Criterion	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C5	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C5	D1C2	D1C2	D1C4	D1C5	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2		D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2	D1C2
Parameter	Abundance	Abundance	Distribution (range)	Habitat condition	Abundance	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	Abundance	Distribution (range)	Habitat condition	Abundance	Abundance	Distribution (range)	Habitat condition	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	Abundance	Abundance	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	Abundance	Abundance	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB		BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB		BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	Abundance	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB	BIOM-SSB
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
Threshold qualitative		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term						Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term													Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term										Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term										Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term				Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term		Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term			Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term	Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term															Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term									Sensitive species should be recovering over the long-term
Threshold value source		OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention						OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention													OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention										OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention										OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention				OSPAR Convention		OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention	OSPAR Convention															OSPAR Convention									OSPAR Convention
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit		Significance statistical			Significance statistical	Significance statistical				Significance statistical				Significance statistical			Significance statistical		Significance statistical				Significance statistical	Significance statistical	Significance statistical	Significance statistical		Significance statistical			Significance statistical		Significance statistical	Significance statistical	Significance statistical	Significance statistical						Significance statistical		Significance statistical				Significance statistical	Significance statistical			Significance statistical			Significance statistical	Significance statistical		Significance statistical			Significance statistical		Significance statistical				Significance statistical				Significance statistical													Significance statistical	Significance statistical		Significance statistical										Significance statistical		Significance statistical				Significance statistical		Significance statistical				Significance statistical		Significance statistical			Significance statistical		Significance statistical										Significance statistical		Significance statistical			Significance statistical		Significance statistical				Significance statistical		Significance statistical			Significance statistical	Significance statistical															Significance statistical									Significance statistical
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend parameter	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	No	Yes	No	No	No	No	Unknown	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	No	No	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	No	Unknown	Yes	Yes	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Unknown	No	No	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	No	Unknown	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Unknown	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Unknown		Unknown	No	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	No	No	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Yes	No	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	No	Yes	No	Unknown	No	No	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Yes	No	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Yes		No	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Unknown
Description parameter	In practice, the available data is insufficient to test against the favourable reference value (FRP). Therefore, all judgements have been awarded on the basis of expert judgement.	The OSPAR indicator FC1 Recovery of sensitive fish species is based on changes in the presence of sensitive fish species. The assessment is based on changes in the extent to which vulnerable species are found in the standardised fisheries monitoring. For a short-term and a long-term analysis, the average scores over the last six years (in most cases 2015-2020) were compared with the six previous years (short term), and with all years in the measurement series (long term). An analysis was made per species and area to determine whether there is a significant increase, or whether the numbers are at least not decreasing. For the assessment of the good environmental status, the starting point is that species show an increase in both the short and long term.	All assessments were based on expert judgement. The environmental status in relation to the distribution area was assessed as favourable for almost all migratory fish.	Based on the assessment of the Habitats Directive (2019)	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.					For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	The OSPAR indicator FC1 Recovery of sensitive fish species is based on changes in the presence of sensitive fish species. The assessment is based on changes in the extent to which vulnerable species are found in the standardised fisheries monitoring. For a short-term and a long-term analysis, the average scores over the last six years (in most cases 2015-2020) were compared with the six previous years (short term), and with all years in the measurement series (long term).	The OSPAR indicator FC1 Recovery of sensitive fish species is based on changes in the presence of sensitive fish species. The assessment is based on changes in the extent to which vulnerable species are found in the standardised fisheries monitoring. For a short-term and a long-term analysis, the average scores over the last six years (in most cases 2015-2020) were compared with the six previous years (short term), and with all years in the measurement series (long term). An analysis was made per species and area to determine whether there is a significant increase, or whether the numbers are at least not decreasing. For the assessment of the good environmental status, the starting point is that species show an increase in both the short and long term.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	The OSPAR indicator FC1 Recovery of sensitive fish species is based on changes in the presence of sensitive fish species. The assessment is based on changes in the extent to which vulnerable species are found in the standardised fisheries monitoring. For a short-term and a long-term analysis, the average scores over the last six years (in most cases 2015-2020) were compared with the six previous years (short term), and with all years in the measurement series (long term). An analysis was made per species and area to determine whether there is a significant increase, or whether the numbers are at least not decreasing. For the assessment of the good environmental status, the starting point is that species show an increase in both the short and long term.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	The OSPAR indicator FC1 Recovery of sensitive fish species is based on changes in the presence of sensitive fish species. The assessment is based on changes in the extent to which vulnerable species are found in the standardised fisheries monitoring. For a short-term and a long-term analysis, the average scores over the last six years (in most cases 2015-2020) were compared with the six previous years (short term), and with all years in the measurement series (long term). An analysis was made per species and area to determine whether there is a significant increase, or whether the numbers are at least not decreasing. For the assessment of the good environmental status, the starting point is that species show an increase in both the short and long term.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.			For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.			For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.		For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.	For reasons of regional coherence, the Netherlands has used the D3 assessments per fish stock from the OSPAR thematic assessment as the basis for the MSFD assessment. These assessments are based on the annual ICES analyses (years 2015-2020) for the Common Fisheries Policy. The integrated assessment (D3C1 and D3C2) was used in the OSPAR thematic assessment. This differs from the Commission Decision, which only takes spawning stock biomass (D3C2) into account.
Related indicator	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C2	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C4	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C5	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C2	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C4	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C5	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C2	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C4	ANSNL D1F-HR-D1C5	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB		CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB		CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	recovery-sensitive-fish-species-qsr23-ospar	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB	CFP-ICES-SSB
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Not good	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Unknown
Description criteria
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Good	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Unknown
Description element
Source assessment feature	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR
Reporting method feature	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A	Type A
Trend feature	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Integration rule type parameter	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 8% of coastal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 29% of demersal species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.	Based on the internationally agreed OSPAR assessment, 40% of pelagic species and their commercially exploited stocks are in good status. Due to regional coherence, these assessments do not take into account national assessments of migratory fish. Limited data availability is seen as an important reason for not achieving the GMT.
GES extent threshold	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00
GES extent achieved	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	8.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00	40.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group
GES achieved	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Description overall status	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment	For the assessment, use was made of a regionally agreed list of species, indicators and assessments per species at the level of the international North Sea. Where an internationally harmonized assessment was not available, national assessments have been developed where possible. These judgments do not count in the final judgment
Assessments period	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020
Related pressures	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b	ANSNL-D1F-T1.12 ANSNL-D1F-T1.13a ANSNL-D1F-T1.13b ANSNL-D1F-T1.14 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.1 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.2 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-D6/D1-T1.3 ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4a ANSNL-D1M-D1B-D1F-T1.4b
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Test results	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	False	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	False	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	False	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	Correct	Correct	False	False	False	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	Correct