Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D10 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D10 Litter |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Report date | 2026-04-10 12:40:24 |
Nederlands Continentaal Plat vanaf de basislijn (0 mijl) (ANS-NL-MS-1)
Regional assessment area |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
beachlitter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea |
plastic-in-fulmar-qsr23-ospar-South-Eastern North Sea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
Feature |
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter and micro-litter in species
|
Element |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Cloth/textile |
Glass/ceramics |
Glass/ceramics |
Macrolitter (all) |
Metal |
Metal |
Other materials |
Paper/cardboard |
Processed/worked wood |
Processed/worked wood |
Rubber |
Rubber |
Artificial polymer materials |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Element 2 |
Fishing gear
|
Single-use plastics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C3
|
Parameter |
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
AMO-B
|
Threshold value upper |
20.0 |
0.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
29.0 |
66.0 |
113.0 |
2.0 |
13.0 |
50.0 |
63.0 |
29.0 |
66.0 |
113.0 |
2.0 |
13.0 |
50.0 |
63.0 |
29.0 |
66.0 |
113.0 |
2.0 |
13.0 |
50.0 |
63.0 |
29.0 |
66.0 |
113.0 |
2.0 |
13.0 |
50.0 |
63.0 |
66.0 |
29.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
129.0 |
1.0 |
5.0 |
37.0 |
1.0 |
3.0 |
9.0 |
4.0 |
7.0 |
||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
items/100m
|
Other
|
g/stomach
|
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
10.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
50.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% of population adversely affected |
Trend parameter |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Description parameter |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(1, 2) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(10, 16) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(44, 55) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(58, 69) |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(1, 2) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(10, 16) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(44, 55) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(58, 69) |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(1, 2) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(10, 16) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(44, 55) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(58, 69) |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(1, 2) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(10, 16) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(44, 55) |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(58, 69) |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(2, 3) |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(4, 6) |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures.
For 'other materials' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures. |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(6, 11) |
The assessment was carried out according to the OSPAR method, using data from four beach locations. The current status was assessed based on the measurement years 2018 to 2020 and with the median as a measure for the average. The trend analysis is also median-based (Theil-Sen method) and covers the years 2015 to 2020. At European level, a threshold value of 20 pieces of litter per 100 metres of beach length has been set. The composition of the waste plays no role in testing against the threshold value, but is monitored and reported. Insight into the composition and quantities per waste category is important for being able to trace sources and to be able to take targeted measures. |
Mean probability that a haul contains a litter item over the eight years of the assessment. 95% confidence intervals based on the yearly probability means.
(5, 8) |
Northern fulmars are ‘true’ seabirds. They forage exclusively on the sea surface and are known to regularly ingest litter. The OSPAR indicator focuses on these ingested quantities and thus provides an indication of the amount of floating litter and the potential negative health effects for these birds.
The stomach contents of beached northern fulmars are analysed, whereby the total weight and composition of the litter (> 1 mm) are determined. The methodology used is internationally standardised and because the monitoring has been ongoing for many years, a lot of data is available. See the OSPAR CEMP Guidelines (2015) for further methodological details. Good environmental status is achieved when a maximum of 10 percent of the birds have more than 0.1 gram of plastic in their stomach. This threshold value was established by OSPAR in 2020. The assessment of the current situation was based on the measurement years 2014 to 2018. The trend analysis was carried out using data from 2009 to 2018. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Description criteria |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastic' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'other materials' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Description element |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'plastics' the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'fishing gear', the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
For 'single-use plastics', the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The condition at criterion level has
improved, but good environmental
status has not yet been achieved in
the Dutch part of the North Sea |
For 'other materials', the number of items found exceeds the European threshold (20 items/100m). Therefore, 'Not good' has been provisionally indicated for this category, even though no specific threshold has been established. |
The status has continued to improve, but good environ-
mental status has not been achieved. |
||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type B2 |
Type A |
Trend feature |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The decrease in the amount of beach waste, which was observed over the previous policy period (2010-2015), continues. However, the threshold value of 20 items per 100 meters is far from being reached: an average of 129 items per 100 meters were found on Dutch beaches in the period 2018-2020 (median values). At the level of the International North Sea this is even 205 items per 100 meters. |
The amount of plastics in northern fulmars has been decreasing significantly for years. However, in the period 2014-2018, the threshold value has not yet been reached anywhere in the International North Sea; 51 percent of the 393 birds examined had more than 0.1 gram of plastic in their stomachs. In the South-eastern-North Sea (Netherlands, Belgium and Germany) this was 50 percent. On average, 21 pieces (0.26 grams) were found per bird. Of all birds analyzed, 92 percent had plastic in their stomachs. |
Assessments period |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2018-2020 |
2014-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |