Member State report / Art11 / 2014 / D11 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2014-10-15
GES Descriptor D11 Energy, incl. underwater noise
Member State Netherlands
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by Rijkswaterstaat
Report date 2014-10-16
Report access
Monitoring programme Monitoring programme name
MP_D11
MP_D11
Monitoring programme Reference existing programme
Monitoring programme Marine Unit ID
Q4e - Programme ID
ANSNL_D11
ANSNL_D11
Q4f - Programme description
The Cabinet views this MSFD Monitoring Programme as a guiding component of the approach to ensure a good status of the marine environment in the Dutch part of the North Sea. The MSFD Monitoring Programme has been drawn up in accordance with Article 11 of the Directive. It details the actual monitoring of the 32 indicators outlined in the Marine Strategy Part 1. Based on the measurement data, the Monitoring Programme provides insight into: 1. The status of the indicators, thereby indicating the extent to which an environmental target is achieved (MSFD, Art. 10), in order to facilitate the ongoing assessment and periodic updating of the environmental targets (MSFD, Art. 5) in order to maintain or reach good environmental status. 2. The effectiveness of the programme of measures to be implemented under the MSFD. Although the Monitoring Programme focuses primarily on the 32 indicators from the Marine Strategy Part 1, it also uses, for the purpose of interpreting the results, a number of supporting parameters that are included as standard during sampling (such as temperature, acidity, conductivity, salinity and dissolved oxygen). For the purpose of the next assessment of the environmental status in 2017-2018 and assessments thereafter, use will also be made of the information resulting from monitoring for research or from other statutory frameworks and policy areas. This includes information from national monitoring under the Bathing Water Directive in the area of microbial pathogens, shipping intensity monitoring (including fishing vessels) for the purpose of shipping traffic safety and bathymetric information obtained from hydrographic measurements. In determining spatial and temporal distribution of the monitoring, natural variation is taken into account as well as the possibilities to distinguish changes from natural variability. Important parameters for climate change and ocean acidification, such as temperature and pH are incorporated in the regular monitoring programmes. Economic data is collected by Statistics Netherlands (abbreviated as CBS in Dutch). CBS supplies the required data following receipt of a specified request for information. Thus, the requirements of MSFD Art. 8 are met and the indicative list of elements included in MSFD Appendix III is incorporated. In this way, the MSFD Monitoring Programme provides a solid basis for updating the Marine Strategy during the second implementation cycle of the MSFD. This begins by updating the initial assessment (MSFD Art. 8) and describing the good environmental status (MSFD Art. 9), environmental targets and indicators (MSFD Art. 10) in 2018, and continues through to the adjustment of the existing programme of measures (Art. 13) in 2021. References: -More information on the rationale for the balance between monitoring of state/impact, pressures, activities and measures: MS II paragraph 2.3 (DPSIR –model) -MS II Annex 4
The Cabinet views this MSFD Monitoring Programme as a guiding component of the approach to ensure a good status of the marine environment in the Dutch part of the North Sea. The MSFD Monitoring Programme has been drawn up in accordance with Article 11 of the Directive. It details the actual monitoring of the 32 indicators outlined in the Marine Strategy Part 1. Based on the measurement data, the Monitoring Programme provides insight into: 1. The status of the indicators, thereby indicating the extent to which an environmental target is achieved (MSFD, Art. 10), in order to facilitate the ongoing assessment and periodic updating of the environmental targets (MSFD, Art. 5) in order to maintain or reach good environmental status. 2. The effectiveness of the programme of measures to be implemented under the MSFD. Although the Monitoring Programme focuses primarily on the 32 indicators from the Marine Strategy Part 1, it also uses, for the purpose of interpreting the results, a number of supporting parameters that are included as standard during sampling (such as temperature, acidity, conductivity, salinity and dissolved oxygen). For the purpose of the next assessment of the environmental status in 2017-2018 and assessments thereafter, use will also be made of the information resulting from monitoring for research or from other statutory frameworks and policy areas. This includes information from national monitoring under the Bathing Water Directive in the area of microbial pathogens, shipping intensity monitoring (including fishing vessels) for the purpose of shipping traffic safety and bathymetric information obtained from hydrographic measurements. In determining spatial and temporal distribution of the monitoring, natural variation is taken into account as well as the possibilities to distinguish changes from natural variability. Important parameters for climate change and ocean acidification, such as temperature and pH are incorporated in the regular monitoring programmes. Economic data is collected by Statistics Netherlands (abbreviated as CBS in Dutch). CBS supplies the required data following receipt of a specified request for information. Thus, the requirements of MSFD Art. 8 are met and the indicative list of elements included in MSFD Appendix III is incorporated. In this way, the MSFD Monitoring Programme provides a solid basis for updating the Marine Strategy during the second implementation cycle of the MSFD. This begins by updating the initial assessment (MSFD Art. 8) and describing the good environmental status (MSFD Art. 9), environmental targets and indicators (MSFD Art. 10) in 2018, and continues through to the adjustment of the existing programme of measures (Art. 13) in 2021. References: -More information on the rationale for the balance between monitoring of state/impact, pressures, activities and measures: MS II paragraph 2.3 (DPSIR –model) -MS II Annex 4
Q5e - Natural variability
  • Quantiative
  • Quantiative
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate data
Y
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Established methods
Y
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES
Y
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate capacity
Y
Y
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment
a,b) In the art 9 and 10 report in 2012 the Netherlands has opted for a general description of GES under art 9 and a further elaboration of the targets and associated indicators under art 10. These targets and indicators cover all criteria from the Commission Decision as far as they are considered relevant for the Netherlands part of the North Sea. Therefore, they also cover the information requirement for the assessment of the descriptors and targets. See paragraph 9.2.13 of the Marine Strategy II for a description of the information and monitoring strategy. c,d) The monitoring programme wil be directed towards indicators that are being developed by OSPAR ICG Underwater Noise. These will provide both quantitative and spatial information on underwater noise and will use registration of human activities that produce underwater noise. e) The MSFD Monitoring Plan will be updated annually in a digitally amended supplement based on the latest developments and insights in the area of indicator definitions and measurement methods, for example as a result from (sub) regional coordination within OSPAR.
a,b) In the art 9 and 10 report in 2012 the Netherlands has opted for a general description of GES under art 9 and a further elaboration of the targets and associated indicators under art 10. These targets and indicators cover all criteria from the Commission Decision as far as they are considered relevant for the Netherlands part of the North Sea. Therefore, they also cover the information requirement for the assessment of the descriptors and targets. See paragraph 9.2.13 of the Marine Strategy II for a description of the information and monitoring strategy. c,d) The monitoring programme wil be directed towards indicators that are being developed by OSPAR ICG Underwater Noise. These will provide both quantitative and spatial information on underwater noise and will use registration of human activities that produce underwater noise. e) The MSFD Monitoring Plan will be updated annually in a digitally amended supplement based on the latest developments and insights in the area of indicator definitions and measurement methods, for example as a result from (sub) regional coordination within OSPAR.
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment
By2018
By2018
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment
The Netherlands has chosen to work towards the set-up of a monitoring programme in regional cooperation, rather than on a national level. The resulting delay is prefered above a non-regional approach. The elaboration of the indicators referred to, the research measurements and the assessment will be coordinated in an international context. Together with the United Kingdom, the Netherlands is leading the Technical Subgroup Noise under the EU Common Implementation Strategy. This working group has developed guidance for translating these indicators into actual monitoring. For the OSPAR region, this is being taken up by the ICG Underwater Noise, for which the Netherlands also acts as co-leader. In 2014 OSPAR has established the indicator on loud low or mid frequency impulsive sound as a common indicator, which will be operational within 1 or 2 years for all OSPAR regions, including the North Sea. It is expected that in 2015 a common indicator on continuous low-frequency sound will be established. Both indicators are expected to contribute to the OSPAR Intermediate Assessment in 2017.
The Netherlands has chosen to work towards the set-up of a monitoring programme in regional cooperation, rather than on a national level. The resulting delay is prefered above a non-regional approach. The elaboration of the indicators referred to, the research measurements and the assessment will be coordinated in an international context. Together with the United Kingdom, the Netherlands is leading the Technical Subgroup Noise under the EU Common Implementation Strategy. This working group has developed guidance for translating these indicators into actual monitoring. For the OSPAR region, this is being taken up by the ICG Underwater Noise, for which the Netherlands also acts as co-leader. In 2014 OSPAR has established the indicator on loud low or mid frequency impulsive sound as a common indicator, which will be operational within 1 or 2 years for all OSPAR regions, including the North Sea. It is expected that in 2015 a common indicator on continuous low-frequency sound will be established. Both indicators are expected to contribute to the OSPAR Intermediate Assessment in 2017.
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Environmental target
11a 11b
11a 11b
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Associated indicator
11a 11b
11a 11b
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_SuitableData
Y
Y
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_EstablishedMethods
Y
Y
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6d_AdequateCapacity
Y
Y
Q6c - Target updating
Y
Y
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment
See 5f
See 5f
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment
By2018
By2018
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment
See 5h
See 5h
Q7a - Relevant activities
  • Defence
  • OilGas
  • RenewableEnergy
  • Shipping
  • Defence
  • OilGas
  • RenewableEnergy
  • Shipping
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities
Annex 4 of the Marine Strategy part 2 shows the DPSIR relations between ecosystem elements/descriptors, pressures and activities, as well as how the pressures and activities and their effects are monitored. Annex 3 of the Marine Strategy part 2 gives the relation between elements from the MSFD Annex 3 and the MSFD monitoring programme.
Annex 4 of the Marine Strategy part 2 shows the DPSIR relations between ecosystem elements/descriptors, pressures and activities, as well as how the pressures and activities and their effects are monitored. Annex 3 of the Marine Strategy part 2 gives the relation between elements from the MSFD Annex 3 and the MSFD monitoring programme.
Q7c - Relevant measures
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate data
Y
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Established methods
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES
Y
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate capacity
Y
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures
Y
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures
Y
Y
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures
The monitoring programme will render quantitative information on the distribution of noise in the Netherlands part of the Greater North Sea. This information gives insight in the effectiveness of current and future measures.
The monitoring programme will render quantitative information on the distribution of noise in the Netherlands part of the Greater North Sea. This information gives insight in the effectiveness of current and future measures.
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures
By2014
By2014
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme ID
ANSNL-D11-Sub2-AmbientNoise
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme name
Acute underwater noise - distribution, frequency and levels
Diffuse underwater noise - distribution, frequency and levels
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme ID
ANSNL-D11-Sub2-AmbientNoise
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme name
Acute underwater noise - distribution, frequency and levels
Diffuse underwater noise - distribution, frequency and levels
Q4k - Monitoring purpose
Pressurse Activities
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions
OSPAR has named the Ambient Noise indicator as Candidate Indicator. It is expected that in April 2015 the indicator will become an OSPAR Common Indicator Together with the United Kingdom, the Netherlands is leading the Technical Subgroup Noise under the EU Common Implementation Strategy. This working group has developed guidance for translating these indicators into actual monitoring [A]. For the OSPAR region, this is being taken up by the ICG Underwater Noise, for which the Netherlands also acts as co-leader. [A] Monitoring Guidance for Underwater Noise in European Seas - Monitoring Guidance Specifications. 2nd Report of the Technical Subgroup on Underwater Noise (TSG Noise). November, 2013. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/6b168331-711a-4ec5-9be3-26600c43808d/MSFD%20Monitoring%20Guidance%20Underwater%20Noise%20Part%20II%20Specifications%20IGR%200516.pdf
Q5c - Features Q5c - Habitats
Q5c - Features Q5c - Species list
  • FishAll
  • MammalsAll
  • FishAll
  • MammalsAll
Q5c - Features Q5c - Physical/Chemical features
Q5c - Features Q5c - Pressures
  • Noise
  • Noise
Q9a - Elements
  • continuous low-frequency sound
Q5a - GES criteria Relevant GES criteria
  • 11.1
  • 11.2
  • 11.1
  • 11.2
Q5b - GES indicators Relevant GES indicators
  • 11.1.1
  • 11.2.1
  • 11.1.1
  • 11.2.1
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species distribution
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population size
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population characteristics
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species impacts
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat distribution
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat extent
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (physical-chemical)
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (biological)
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat impacts
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure input
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure output
  • MP-9b-2-2-1
  • MP-9b-2-2-10
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) Activity
  • MP-9b-3-1-1
  • MP-9b-3-1-2
  • MP-9b-3-1-3
  • MP-9b-3-1-4
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) Other
Q41 Spatial scope
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ
Q4j - Description of spatial scope
Shipping is the main antropogenic source of ambient noise. To map out the potential (cumulative effects) of uninterrupted continuous background noise, existing data on ship movements, additional measurements and modelling will be used. The Netherlands has chosen to work towards the set-up of a monitoring programme in regional cooperation, rather than on a national level. The resulting delay is prefered above a non-regional approach. The elaboration of the indicators referred to, the research measurements and the assessment will be coordinated in an international context.
Marine Unit IDs
  • ANSNL
  • ANSNL
Q4h - Temporal scope Start date- End date
-
2016-9999
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling
  • Continually
Q9c - Monitoring method
To map out the potential (cumulative effects) of uninterrupted continuous background noise, existing data on ship movements, additional measurements and modelling will be used. Monitoring Guidance for Underwater Noise in European Seas - Monitoring Guidance Specifications. 2nd Report of the Technical Subgroup on Underwater Noise (TSG Noise). November, 2013. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/6b168331-711a-4ec5-9be3-26600c43808d/MSFD%20Monitoring%20Guidance%20Underwater%20Noise%20Part%20II%20Specifications%20IGR%200516.pdf
Q9d - Description of alteration to method
Q9e - Quality assurance
  • Unknown
Q9f - Quality control
Unknown
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - Proportion of area covered %
100
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - No. of samples
Q9i - Description of sample representivity
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data
  • EU
  • Region
  • Subregion
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data type
ProcessedData DataProducts Simulated
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access mechanism
LocationInternationalDC
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access rights
RestrictedSpecific
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - INSPIRE standard
EnvMonitoringFacilities
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c Date data are available
2015-12
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data update frequency
Yearly
Q10d - Description of data access
Each year in December a basic MSFD-datafile will be made available via the website of the Informatiehuis Marien (http://www.informatiehuismarien.nl/)