Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D11 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D11 Energy, incl. underwater noise |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Report date | 2026-04-10 12:40:24 |
Nederlands Continentaal Plat vanaf de basislijn (0 mijl) (ANS-NL-MS-1)
Regional assessment area |
distribution-reported-impulsive-sounds-sea-qsr23-ospar-II |
OSPAR-Greater North Sea |
OSPAR-Greater North Sea |
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D11
|
D11
|
D11
|
Feature |
Impulsive sound in water
|
Continuous low frequency sound
|
Continuous low frequency sound
|
Element |
Continuous sound (1/3 octave frequency band centred on 125 Hz) |
Continuous sound (1/3 octave frequency band centred on 63 Hz) |
|
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
Other |
Other |
|
Criterion |
D11C1
|
D11C2
|
D11C2
|
Parameter |
Duration
|
Underwater sound level
|
Underwater sound level
|
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
No threshold values have yet been determined, so for the time being the assessment is based on expert judgment. |
||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
1.5242 |
||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
index
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
90.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
The Netherlands reports on the basis of the OSPAR assessment (QSR2023) Risk of Impact from Anthropogenic Impulsive Sound, in which the degree of impact has been calculated for each ICES sub-grid cell (years 2015-2019). A total of 185 ICES sub-grid cells are located in the Dutch part of the North Sea (valueAchieved between 0 and 1,5). Based on a preliminary expert assessment, ICES sub-grid- cells with a calculated disturbance value greater 0.89 (based on worst case) have been assessed as not compliant. Based on this preliminary estimate, it appears that approximately 90% of the surface of the Dutch North Sea is compliant with regard to impulsive noise. The calculation took into account that a number of ICES sub-grid-cells partly overlap with the Dutch part of the North Sea and that the part outside Dutch waters should not be included in the assessment. The disturbance values calculated by OSPAR at the level of sub-grid-cells are available via: https://odims.ospar.org/public/submissions/noise/risk-noise-msfd/2022-06/001/ospar_risk_noise_msfd_2022_06_001-other-risk-of-impact_assessment_impulsive_noise_msfd.xlsx |
Ship noise is the dominant source of continuous sound in the North Sea. This source causes an increase of 20 dB above the natural sound level in the southern part of the North Sea and along the major shipping lanes. The sound level is lowest on Dogger Bank. The indicator needs further development and the assessment results still have a provisional status. However, the assessment results justify the conclusion that the status in the Dutch part of the North Sea does not meet good environmental status. |
Ship noise is the dominant source of continuous sound in the North Sea. This source causes an increase of 20 dB above the natural sound level in the southern part of the North Sea and along the major shipping lanes. The sound level is lowest on Dogger Bank. The indicator needs further development and the assessment results still have a provisional status. However, the assessment results justify the conclusion that the status in the Dutch part of the North Sea does not meet good environmental status. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The OSPAR analysis shows that throughout the North Sea, seismic surveys are the most dominant source of impulsive sound. There was (only) one seismic survey carried out in the Dutch part of the North Sea during the assessment period. In addition, pile driving for wind farm construction and munitions clearance caused impulsive noise. Based on expert judgement, the Netherlands concludes that the current state meets good environmental status. This assessment is supported by comparing the calculated risks of disturbance to porpoises with the stipulation for pile-driving activities for Offshore Wind Energy. The latter, which is much stricter than the European threshold, has been amply met. |
Ship noise is the dominant source of continuous sound in the North Sea. This source causes an increase of 20 dB above the natural sound level in the southern part of the North Sea and along the major shipping lanes. The sound level is lowest on Dogger Bank. The indicator needs further development and the assessment results still have a provisional status. However, the assessment results justify the conclusion that the status in the Dutch part of the North Sea does not meet good environmental status. |
Ship noise is the dominant source of continuous sound in the North Sea. This source causes an increase of 20 dB above the natural sound level in the southern part of the North Sea and along the major shipping lanes. The sound level is lowest on Dogger Bank. The indicator needs further development and the assessment results still have a provisional status. However, the assessment results justify the conclusion that the status in the Dutch part of the North Sea does not meet good environmental status. |
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
|
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type A |
Type A |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
|||
GES extent achieved |
89.70 |
||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
The Netherlands uses the OSPAR assessment of the Risk-of-impact indicator for the years 2015-2019. OSPAR reports the ‘risk of impact index’ value, that is equal to log10(average_#HPDD). The average_#HPDDs is the average number of PBDs multiplied by the number of harbour porpoises in that block. HPDD=harbour porpoise disturbance day . PBD=pulse block day. Based on the KEC approach of The Netherlands a total number of HPDD of 2 000 000 for the Dutch Continental Shelf is considered acceptable. This value corresponds to a HPDD of 14 085 per ICES subrectangle, which corresponds to an index value of 0.89. |
Although results are still preliminary and OSPAR does not use a threshold value, it is very likely that good environmental status has not been achieved in the Dutch part of the North Sea. |
Although results are still preliminary and OSPAR does not use a threshold value, it is very likely that good environmental status has not been achieved in the Dutch part of the North Sea. |
Assessments period |
2015-2019 |
2019 |
2019 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |