MS/Art8-2024/2024/D2/Netherlands/NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D2 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art8
Report due	2024-10-15
GES Descriptor	D2 Non-indigenous species
Member State	Netherlands
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report date	2026-04-10 12:40:24

Nederlands Continentaal Plat vanaf de basislijn (0 mijl) (ANS-NL-MS-1)

Simplified table

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2	D2
Feature	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species	Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
Element	Aoroides longimerus	Aoroides semicurvatus	Arcuatula senhousia	Ariomma indicum	Balanus glandula	Biflustra grandicella	Caprella scaura	Desdemona ornata	Ericthonius didymus	Haloa japonica	Hydroides ezoensis	Jassa slatteryi	Mulinia lateralis	Notocomplana koreana	Polydora websteri	Potamocorbula amurensis	Primavelans glabricollaris	Prosthiostomum wagurensis	Pseudopolydora paucibranchiata	Radicilingua mediterranea	Schizoporella errata	Tridentiger barbatus	Watersipora subatra	Yoldia limatula
Element extent
Trend element	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Element 2
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1	D2C1
Parameter	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence	Presence
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Proportion threshold value	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value	% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trend parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Parameter achieved	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No
Description parameter	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Dutch delta. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Dutch delta. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record North Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2016. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2015. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Fisheries & aquaculture. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Port of Rotterdam. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Fisheries & aquaculture. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record North Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2015. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2016. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Grevelingen. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".
Related indicator	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar	trends-new-records-nis-qsr23-ospar
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description criteria	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Dutch delta. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Dutch delta. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record North Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2016. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2015. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Fisheries & aquaculture. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Port of Rotterdam. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Fisheries & aquaculture. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record North Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2015. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2016. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Grevelingen. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Dutch delta. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Dutch delta. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record North Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2016. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2015. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Fisheries & aquaculture. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Port of Rotterdam. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2017. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Fisheries & aquaculture. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record North Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Veerse Meer. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2015. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Natural distribution. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2020. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Wadden Sea. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2016. Waterbody 1st record Oosterschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2018. Waterbody 1st record Grevelingen. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Hull fouling. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".	Year 1st introduction NL 2019. Waterbody 1st record Westerschelde. Most probably first reached the Netherlands by Ballast water. For additional information: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Gittenberger, A. & Rensing, M., (2022). Non-indigenous species in the coastal waters of the Netherlands: update 2020. Issued by Office for Risk Assessment and Research, Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. GiMaRIS 2022_16: 40 pp"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".
Source assessment feature	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR
Reporting method feature	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C
Trend feature	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating
Integration rule type parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule type criteria	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00	18.00
GES extent achieved	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00	24.00
GES extent unit	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species	Number of newly-introduced species
GES achieved	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Description overall status	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.	The number of newly introduced non-native species in the Dutch part of the North Sea has not decreased in the past plan period, which means that good environmental status has not yet been achieved. This assessment is based on a Dutch analysis, in which the OSPAR methodology was used and the dataset from the QSR (OSPAR, 2023) was supplemented with more recent data. The methodology followed differs from that in the previous assessment (Marine Strategy part 1, 2018). At the time, the Netherlands conducted a national analysis that only included NIS observations from the Dutch North Sea. NIS observations in adjacent waters such as the Zeeland delta and Wadden Sea were not included in the assessment. In addition, the result deviates because, due to delayed publication (September 2017), data on the introduction of the American beach shell were not available in time for the analysis. Ultimately, the 2018 analysis showed a decline, leading to the conclusion that the GMT had been achieved. Provisional threshold value: decrease in the number of introductions compared to the previous plan period.
Assessments period	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020	2015-2020
Related pressures	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2	ANSNL-D2-T2.1 ANSNL-D2-T2.2
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Test results	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False