Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D3 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Report date | 2026-04-10 12:40:24 |
Nederlands Continentaal Plat vanaf de basislijn (0 mijl) (ANS-NL-MS-1)
Regional assessment area |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
ICES-Greater North Sea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Buccinum undatum |
Buccinum undatum |
Cancer pagurus |
Cancer pagurus |
Cerastoderma edule |
Cerastoderma edule |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Crangon crangon |
Crangon crangon |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Ensis ensis |
Ensis ensis |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Homarus gammarus |
Homarus gammarus |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Loligo spp. |
Loligo spp. |
Lophius piscatorius |
Lophius piscatorius |
Maja squinado |
Maja squinado |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Microstomus kitt |
Microstomus kitt |
Molva molva |
Molva molva |
Mytilus edulis |
Mytilus edulis |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Pandalus borealis |
Pandalus borealis |
Pandalus borealis |
Pandalus borealis |
Pecten maximus |
Pecten maximus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius virens |
Pollachius virens |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trisopterus esmarkii |
Trisopterus esmarkii |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Division 4.a, Sandeel Area 5r (northern North Sea, Viking and Bergen banks) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Division 4.a, Sandeel Area 5r (northern North Sea, Viking and Bergen banks) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Division 4.a, Sandeel Area 7r (northern North Sea, Shetland) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in Division 4.a, Sandeel Area 7r (northern North Sea, Shetland) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.a and 4.b, Sandeel Area 4 (northern and central North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.a and 4.b, Sandeel Area 4 (northern and central North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.a and 4.b, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 3r (Skagerrak, northern and central North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.a and 4.b, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 3r (Skagerrak, northern and central North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in subdivisions 20-22, Sandeel Area 6 (Kattegat) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in subdivisions 20-22, Sandeel Area 6 (Kattegat) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subareas 1, 2, 5 and divisions 4.a and 14.a, Norwegian spring-spawning herring (the Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subareas 1, 2, 5 and divisions 4.a and 14.a, Norwegian spring-spawning herring (the Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 4.b-c, 7.a, and 7.d-h (central and southern North Sea, Irish Sea, English Channel, Bristol Channel, and Celtic Sea) |
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 4.b-c, 7.a, and 7.d-h (central and southern North Sea, Irish Sea, English Channel, Bristol Channel, and Celtic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, Division 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, Division 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 21 (Kattegat)
|
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 21 (Kattegat)
|
Cod (Gadus morhua) in divisions 7.e-k (eastern English Channel and southern Celtic Seas) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in divisions 7.e-k (eastern English Channel and southern Celtic Seas) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat)
|
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
White anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) in Subarea 7 and divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (Celtic Seas, Bay of Biscay) |
White anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) in Subarea 7 and divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (Celtic Seas, Bay of Biscay) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b-k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b-k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
|
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat)
|
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b-c and 7.e-k (southern Celtic Seas and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b-c and 7.e-k (southern Celtic Seas and eastern English Channel) |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7, and divisions 3.a, 8.a-b and 8.d, Northern stock (Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7, and divisions 3.a, 8.a-b and 8.d, Northern stock (Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1-9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1-9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 3,4, 6–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 3,4, 6–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 10 (northern North Sea, Noup) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 10 (northern North Sea, Noup) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 32 (northern North Sea, Norway Deep) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 32 (northern North Sea, Norway Deep) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 7 (northern North Sea, Fladen Ground) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 7 (northern North Sea, Fladen Ground) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 9 (central North Sea, Moray Firth) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.a, Functional Unit 9 (central North Sea, Moray Firth) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 33 (central North Sea, Horn’s Reef) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 33 (central North Sea, Horn’s Reef) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 34 (central North Sea, Devil’s Hole) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 34 (central North Sea, Devil’s Hole) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 6 (central North Sea, Farn Deeps) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 6 (central North Sea, Farn Deeps) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 8 (central North Sea, Firth of Forth) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 8 (central North Sea, Firth of Forth) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Functional Unit 5 (central and southern North Sea, Botney Cut-Silver Pit) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Functional Unit 5 (central and southern North Sea, Botney Cut-Silver Pit) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in Division 4.a West (northern North Sea, Fladen Ground) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in Division 4.a West (northern North Sea, Fladen Ground) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in divisions 3.a and 4.a East (Skagerrak and Kattegat and northern North Sea in the Norwegian Deep) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in divisions 3.a and 4.a East (Skagerrak and Kattegat and northern North Sea in the Norwegian Deep) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) and Subdivision 20 (Skagerrak) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) and Subdivision 20 (Skagerrak) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 21-23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 21-23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in subareas 6-7 (Celtic Seas and the English Channel) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in subareas 6-7 (Celtic Seas and the English Channel) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in Subarea 7 (Southern Celtic Seas, English Channel) |
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in Subarea 7 (Southern Celtic Seas, English Channel) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d-e (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, English Channel) |
Brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d-e (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Sole (Solea solea) in subdivisions 20-24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in subdivisions 20-24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a and Subarea 4 (Skagerrak, Kattegat and North Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a and Subarea 4 (Skagerrak, Kattegat and North Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel)
|
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a, 4.a, 5.b, 6.a, 7.a-c and 7.e-k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a, 4.a, 5.b, 6.a, 7.a-c and 7.e-k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in divisions 3.a, 4.b-c, and 7.d (Skagerrak and Kattegat, southern and central North Sea, eastern English Channel) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in divisions 3.a, 4.b-c, and 7.d (Skagerrak and Kattegat, southern and central North Sea, eastern English Channel) |
Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Value achieved upper |
1.00537254901961 |
2.18445607235142 |
0.931231034482759 |
0.444037698412698 |
0.669569892473118 |
1.51090512614608 |
0.978571428571429 |
1.28350083752094 |
1.3 |
0.450277777777778 |
0.807957044172018 |
0.645392801902255 |
3.64655172413793 |
0.565775862068966 |
0.9 |
2.13770431924025 |
0.766059027777778 |
2.02632478632479 |
1.28186968838527 |
3.19387251078875 |
1.75280864197531 |
0.570822731128075 |
1.01434187666792 |
1.98577777777778 |
0.7147172261797 |
0.872351388888889 |
3.11010352230938 |
1.37447916666667 |
2.2418722962963 |
0.9 |
2.52507983212445 |
1.32269204059829 |
1.21064723380336 |
1.1 |
2.96351512062521 |
0.782429336622807 |
1.91617628433087 |
1.44354838709677 |
1.80440451021846 |
1.16069788797062 |
1.24898836112266 |
0.869996987179487 |
1.83020103359173 |
0.645 |
1.36333333333333 |
0.958625669225277 |
1.3731220908182 |
2.69134955020329 |
1.1304347826087 |
0.79745326008262 |
0.750804597701149 |
1.59879310344828 |
2.2108268983269 |
0.568626764399209 |
0.778205128205128 |
0.9225 |
1.87178933333333 |
0.649552703228316 |
2.8937765479113 |
1.62584436936937 |
0.491347334638965 |
0.938 |
1.75645768804252 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is based on average fishing mortality over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
The assessment is usually based on the average spawning stock biomass over the period 2015-2020. The annual ICES stock assessments were used as a basis. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
28.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Of 71 commercially-exploited fish and shellfish stocks, 20 of these (28 per cent)
have good status, 19 (27 per cent) do not meet the criteria for good status and
for 32 (45 per cent) there is insufficient information available for assessment.
This means that good environmental status has not been achieved. |
Assessments period |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |