Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D6 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | Netherlands |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Water management, Ministry of infrastructure and the environment |
Report date | 2019-04-15 |
Report access | XML_ART10_201904091515.xml |
Target code |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T2 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D1T3 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T1 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T2 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T3 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T4 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
ANSNL-D6T5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target description |
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Restoration of rest for marine mammals and birds by reducing fishing in the Vlakte van de Raan and the North Sea Coastal Zone (under the VIBEG agreement).
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
Preparing and implementing the management plans for Natura 2000 sites at sea.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
10-15% of the surface of the Dutch part of the North Sea is not significantly affected by human activities.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
Improving the quality of the assessed areas and habitats.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
No increase in time of physical disturbance from fishing activities of the total seabed of the NCP and of the habitats described under the MSFD.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Further development and testing of regional assessment methods (OSPAR) that can be used in the future for the assessment of benthic and pelagic habitats.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Return and recovery of biogenic reefs.
|
Feature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timescale |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
202407 |
Update date |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
201807 |
Update type |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Same as 2012 definition |
Marine reporting unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
Alca torda |
Benthic feeders breeding |
Benthic feeders non breeding |
Chroicocephalus ridibundus |
Fratercula arctica |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Grazing feeders non breeding |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus canus |
Larus fuscus |
Larus marinus |
Morus bassanus |
Phalacrocorax aristotelis |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phoca vitulina |
Phoca vitulina |
Phocoena phocoena |
Phocoena phocoena |
Rissa tridactyla |
Stercorarius parasiticus |
Stercorarius skua |
Sterna albifrons |
Sterna dougallii |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Surface feeders breeding |
Surface feeders non breeding |
Uria aalge |
Wading feeders breeding |
Wading feeders non breeding |
Water column feeders breeding |
Water column feeders non breeding |
Benthic feeders breeding |
Benthic feeders non breeding |
Coastal Zone Sand (NL) |
Demersal fish community |
Dogger Bank Sand (NL) |
Fratercula arctica |
Frysian Front Sand (NL) |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Grazing feeders non breeding |
H1110b |
H1110c |
H1170 |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshSand |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus canus |
Larus fuscus |
Larus marinus |
Morus bassanus |
Offshore Sand (NL) |
Oyster Banks Mud (NL) |
Phalacrocorax aristotelis |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phoca vitulina |
Phoca vitulina |
Phocoena phocoena |
Phocoena phocoena |
Rissa tridactyla |
Sensitive fish species |
Stercorarius parasiticus |
Stercorarius skua |
Sterna dougallii |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sternula albifrons |
Surface feeders breeding |
Surface feeders non breeding |
Uria aalge |
Wading feeders breeding |
Wading feeders non breeding |
Water column feeders breeding |
Water column feeders non breeding |
1110 |
A5.1 |
A5.2 |
A5.3 |
A5.4 |
Coastal Zone Sand (NL) |
Dogger Bank Sand (NL) |
Frysian Front Sand (NL) |
H1170 |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshSand |
Offshore Sand (NL) |
Oyster Banks Mud (NL) |
1110 |
Coastal Zone Sand (NL) |
Dogger Bank Sand (NL) |
Frysian Front Sand (NL) |
H1170 |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshSand |
Offshore Sand (NL) |
Oyster Banks Mud (NL) |
1110 |
Coastal Zone Sand (NL) |
Dogger Bank Sand (NL) |
Frysian Front Sand (NL) |
H1170 |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshSand |
Offshore Sand (NL) |
Oyster Banks Mud (NL) |
1110 |
Coastal Zone Sand (NL) |
Dogger Bank Sand (NL) |
Frysian Front Sand (NL) |
Fytoplankton |
H1170 |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshSand |
Offshore Sand (NL) |
Oyster Banks Mud (NL) |
Zooplankton |
1110 |
Coastal Zone Sand (NL) |
Dogger Bank Sand (NL) |
Frysian Front Sand (NL) |
H1170 |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshSand |
Offshore Sand (NL) |
Oyster Banks Mud (NL) |
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Fecundity rate
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Habitat condition
|
Size distribution
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Fecundity rate
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Habitat condition
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Biomass
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Abundance
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter - other |
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Proportion failing to spawn.
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
Breeding Success
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target value |
3.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
75.0 |
-1.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
3.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
1.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
75.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
-1.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
3.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - upper |
3.0 |
100.0 |
55.6 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
88.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
9.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
58.3 |
80.0 |
4.0 |
50.0 |
75.0 |
80.0 |
66.7 |
100.0 |
55.6 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
88.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
9.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
58.3 |
80.0 |
4.0 |
50.0 |
75.0 |
80.0 |
66.7 |
82.0 |
82.0 |
92.0 |
75.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
ratio
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
ratio
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit - other |
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Trend indicator
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
Broods per 6 years
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
“Trend indicator”
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
“Trend indicator”
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
"Trend indicator"
|
Trend indicator
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend Indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
"Trend indicator"
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
Trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
trend indicator
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target status |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Assessment period |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1994-2016 |
1994-2016 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
2015-2024 |
1983-2016 |
2015-2024 |
1986-2015 |
2015-2024 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1994-2016 |
1994-2016 |
1986-2015 |
2010-2016 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1986-2015 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
1992-2014 |
2015-2024 |
2009-2015 |
2009-2015 |
2009-2015 |
2009-2015 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2024 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2024 |
2004-2014 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2004-2014 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
2015-2015 |
Target assessment description |
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species.
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
No decrease in the trend of pupil production to the level where the maximum decrease of 1 % is compared to the latest
assessment
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
The censuses of small cetaceans in European Atlantic waters (scans 1994, 2005 and 2016) show stable trends.
|
The censuses of small cetaceans in European Atlantic waters (scans 1994, 2005 and 2016) show stable trends.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold applies to all species
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In the International North Sea, there is a recovery in terms of the size composition within the bottom fishing community. Only in the northern part of the Celtic Sea are the target values for recovery met. Target values that are not yet met in various individual survey assessments can, according to recent recovery trends, be achieved by the year 2022 provided that the current level of threat does not increase further. There is no recovery yet in the Southern North Sea.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
The number of newly born gray seals in the International North Sea and parts of the Celtic Sea has increased significantly every year since 1992, a trend that continues to this day (2009-2014).
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
At least a stable trend in the grey and common seals population
|
The censuses of small cetaceans in European Atlantic waters (scans 1994, 2005 and 2016) show stable trends.
|
The censuses of small cetaceans in European Atlantic waters (scans 1994, 2005 and 2016) show stable trends.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
There is no evidence of a significant recovery of sensitive fish species in the 2010-2016 period in the regional scale of the North East Atlantic. However, the decline in sensitive fish species has been stopped since 2010, both at the regional scale and at the subregional scale of the international North Sea. Different indicators defining sensitive fish species and different methods of integrating data produced the same conclusions.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
At least 3 successful broods per 6 years. This threshold value applies to all species.
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
For each functional group, the population size for at least 75% of the species is above the 1992 threshold value (OSPAR assessment value).
|
Concerns habitat H1110b and H1110c. Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Proven % grid cells (with relevant habitats).
|
Proven % grid cells (with relevant habitats).
|
Proven % grid cells (with relevant habitats).
|
Proven % grid cells (with relevant habitats).
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Concerns habitat H1110b and H1110c. Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Concerns habitat H1110b and H1110c. Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Concerns habitat H1110b and H1110c. Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
The last cycle has started to develop the assessment methods for pelagic habitats.
The first assessments that are now available show that there are fluctuations in the composition, biomass and abundance of the plankton community. However, on the basis of this it is too early to assess whether the good environmental status is being met.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
The last cycle has started to develop the assessment methods for pelagic habitats.
The first assessments that are now available show that there are fluctuations in the composition, biomass and abundance of the plankton community. However, on the basis of this it is too early to assess whether the good environmental status is being met.
|
Concerns habitat H1110b and H1110c. Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
Status not yet known because an improvement compared to the T0 (situation in 2015) must be established. No data is currently available for this trend assessment (the next year with benthos monitoring is 2018). However, based on indicative trends, it appears that GMT will not be met in 2018.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
In OSPAR, Margalef index scores have been calculated for various areas within the Southern North Sea. Based on these scores, a comparison between areas is possible, but it is not yet possible to make statements about the status of the areas concerned and the Southern North Sea as a whole. This requires threshold values that have not yet been developed within the OSPAR context.
|
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|