Member State report / Art11 / 2014 / D9 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2014-10-15
GES Descriptor D9 Contaminants in seafood
Member State Netherlands
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by Rijkswaterstaat
Report date 2014-10-16
Report access
Monitoring programme Monitoring programme name
MP_D9
Monitoring programme Reference existing programme
Monitoring programme Marine Unit ID
Q4e - Programme ID
ANSNL-D09
Q4f - Programme description
The Cabinet views this MSFD Monitoring Programme as a guiding component of the approach to ensure a good status of the marine environment in the Dutch part of the North Sea. The MSFD Monitoring Programme has been drawn up in accordance with Article 11 of the Directive. It details the actual monitoring of the 32 indicators outlined in the Marine Strategy Part 1. Based on the measurement data, the Monitoring Programme provides insight into: 1. The status of the indicators, thereby indicating the extent to which an environmental target is achieved (MSFD, Art. 10), in order to facilitate the ongoing assessment and periodic updating of the environmental targets (MSFD, Art. 5) in order to maintain or reach good environmental status. 2. The effectiveness of the programme of measures to be implemented under the MSFD. Although the Monitoring Programme focuses primarily on the 32 indicators from the Marine Strategy Part 1, it also uses, for the purpose of interpreting the results, a number of supporting parameters that are included as standard during sampling (such as temperature, acidity, conductivity, salinity and dissolved oxygen). For the purpose of the next assessment of the environmental status in 2017-2018 and assessments thereafter, use will also be made of the information resulting from monitoring for research or from other statutory frameworks and policy areas. This includes information from national monitoring under the Bathing Water Directive in the area of microbial pathogens, shipping intensity monitoring (including fishing vessels) for the purpose of shipping traffic safety and bathymetric information obtained from hydrographic measurements. In determing spatial and temporal distribution of the monitoring, natural variation is taken into account as well as the possibilities to distinguish changes from natural variability. Important parameters for climate change and ocean acidification, such as temperature and pH are incorporated in the regular monitoring programmes. Economic data is collected by Statistics Netherlands (abbreviated as CBS in Dutch). CBS supplies the required data following receipt of a specified request for information. Thus, the requirements of MSFD Art. 8 are met and the indicative list of elements included in MSFD Appendix III is incorporated. In this way, the MSFD Monitoring Programme provides a solid basis for updating the Marine Strategy during the second implementation cycle of the MSFD. This begins by updating the initial assessment (MSFD Art. 8) and describing the good environmental status (MSFD Art. 9), environmental targets and indicators (MSFD Art. 10) in 2018, and continues through to the adjustment of the existing programme of measures (Art. 13) in 2021. References: -More information on the rationale for the balance between monitoring of state/impact, pressures, activities and measures: MS II paragraph 2.3 (DPSIR –model) -MS II Annex 4
Q5e - Natural variability
  • Not relevant
  • Other
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate data
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Established methods
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate capacity
Y
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment
a,b) In the art 9 and 10 report in 2012 the Netherlands has opted for a general description of GES under art 9 and a further elaboration of the targets and associated indicators under art 10. These targets and indicators cover all criteria from the Commission Decision as far as they are considered relevant for the Netherlands part of the North Sea. Therefore, they also cover the information requirement for the assessment of the descriptors and targets. See paragraph 9.2.11 of the Marine Strategy II for a detailed description of how the targets and the information required to describe GES, via the elaboration of an information strategy, functional requirements and a monitoring strategy, are translated into the monitoring plan c) In the initial assessment it was concluded that GES has been reached for this descriptor. The monitoring allows for the quantitative assessment of both deviation from GES and trends. d) The measurements in the monitoring programme cannot distinguish natural (background) concentrations of metals and other naturally occurring compounds such as PAHs from anthropogenic sources. This has to be taken into account in the assessment. e) e) The MSFD Monitoring Plan will be updated annually in a digitally amended supplement based on the latest developments and insights in the area of indicator definitions and measurement methods, for example as a result from (sub) regional coordination within OSPAR.
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment
By2014
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment
For the assessment of contaminants in the marine environment monitoring in biota is used (See sub-programme ANSNL-D08-Sub2-OSPAR-ConcBiota). It is being investigated whether there is could be an advantage in combining these monitoring programmes. Coordinated monitoring and assessment are already taking place under the applicable European laws and regulations.
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Environmental target
9
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Associated indicator
9
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_SuitableData
Y
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_EstablishedMethods
Y
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6d_AdequateCapacity
Y
Q6c - Target updating
Y
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment
See 5f
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment
By2014
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment
Q7a - Relevant activities
  • AgricultForestry
  • Dredging
  • Industry
  • OilGas
  • Shipping
  • Urban
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities
Annex 4 of the Marine Strategy part 2 shows the DPSIR relations between ecosystem elements/descriptors, pressures and activities, as well as how the pressures and activities and their effects are monitored. Annex 3 of the Marine Strategy part 2 gives the relation between elements from the MSFD Annex 3 and the MSFD monitoring programme.
Q7c - Relevant measures
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate data
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Established methods
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate capacity
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures
Y
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures
The monitoring programme renders quantitative information on the levels of contaminants in fish and seafood in the Netherlands part of the Greater North Sea. This information gives insight in the effectiveness of current and future measures
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures
By2014
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes
  • CFP-DC-MAP
  • OSPAR
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme ID
ANSNL-D09-Sub1
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme name
Contaminant levels - in species, including seafood
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme ID
ANSNL-D09-Sub1
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme name
Contaminant levels - in species, including seafood
Q4k - Monitoring purpose
StateImpact
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions
EC maximum levels for contamininants in foodstuffs: COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 17 March 2010 on the monitoring of perfluoroalkylated substances in food (2010/161/EU) Table 1 on page 8 of the report http://edepot.wur.nl/274433 gives an overview of the maximum levels that the monitored values are compared to. http://edepot.wur.nl/274433
Q5c - Features Q5c - Habitats
  • SeabedHabitatsAll WaterColumnHabitatsAll
Q5c - Features Q5c - Species list
  • FishAll
Q5c - Features Q5c - Physical/Chemical features
Q5c - Features Q5c - Pressures
  • IntroHazSubstOther
Q9a - Elements
  • Brominated flame retardants (BFRs)
  • Cadmium
  • Dioxins (Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and Polychlorinated dibenzofurans) and dioxin-like compounds
  • Lead
  • Mercury
  • Organotin compounds
  • Phthalates
  • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
  • per- and polyfluoralkylsubstances (PFASs)
Q5a - GES criteria Relevant GES criteria
  • 9.1
Q5b - GES indicators Relevant GES indicators
  • 9.1.1
  • 9.1.2
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species distribution
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population size
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population characteristics
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species impacts
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat distribution
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat extent
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (physical-chemical)
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (biological)
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat impacts
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure input
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure output
  • MP-9b-2-2-2
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) Activity
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) Other
Q41 Spatial scope
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ
Q4j - Description of spatial scope
Since 2004, the WOT-programme includes a yearly analysis of a wide range of contaminants in several species of fish, shellfish and cod-livers originating from the North Sea. See the report for more information: http://edepot.wur.nl/274433
Marine Unit IDs
  • ANSNL
Q4h - Temporal scope Start date- End date
1977-9999
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling
  • Yearly
Q9c - Monitoring method
The WOT programme runs since 2004. For the programme, each year 15-20 samples of North Sea fish and shellfish are taken and analysed on a wide range of contaminants. Every fish-sample is a mixed sample consisting of the edible parts of 25 individual fishes. http://edepot.wur.nl/274433
Q9d - Description of alteration to method
Q9e - Quality assurance
  • Other
  • RIKILT is accredited for the organization of Proficiency Tests by the Dutch Accreditation Council since 2006. The accreditation is based on ISO/IEC 17025:2010 and covers the quality system of the organisation as well as all the parameters mentioned in the scope.
Q9f - Quality control
OtherQC
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - Proportion of area covered %
100
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - No. of samples
Each year 15-20 samples of North Sea fish and shellfish are taken and analysed on a wide range of contaminants. Every fish-sample is a mixed sample consisting of the edible parts of 25 individual fishes.
Q9i - Description of sample representivity
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data
  • EU
  • Region
  • Subregion
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data type
ProcessedData DataProducts
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access mechanism
URLdownload
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access rights
Open
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - INSPIRE standard
EnvMonitoringFacilities
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c Date data are available
2015-12
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data update frequency
Yearly
Q10d - Description of data access
Each year in December a basic MSFD-datafile will be made available via the website of the Informatiehuis Marien (http://www.informatiehuismarien.nl/)