Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D9 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Report date | 2026-04-10 12:40:24 |
Nederlands Continentaal Plat vanaf de basislijn (0 mijl) (ANS-NL-MS-1)
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Sum of benz (a) pyrene, benz (a) anthracene, benzo (b) fluoranthene and chrysene |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
Mytilus edulis
|
Cancer pagurus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Crangon crangon
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Limanda limanda
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scophthalmus maximus
|
Solea solea
|
Cancer pagurus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Crangon crangon
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Limanda limanda
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scophthalmus maximus
|
Solea solea
|
Cancer pagurus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Crangon crangon
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Limanda limanda
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scophthalmus maximus
|
Solea solea
|
Cancer pagurus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Crangon crangon
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Limanda limanda
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scophthalmus maximus
|
Solea solea
|
Cancer pagurus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Crangon crangon
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Limanda limanda
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scophthalmus maximus
|
Solea solea
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Cancer pagurus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Crangon crangon
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Limanda limanda
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scophthalmus maximus
|
Solea solea
|
Element source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Threshold value upper |
5.0 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
30.0 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Value achieved upper |
0.709 |
0.024 |
0.02 |
0.2 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.018 |
0.0091 |
0.0091 |
0.0091 |
0.063 |
0.11 |
0.0091 |
0.018 |
0.014 |
0.005 |
0.018 |
0.957 |
1.17 |
1.67 |
7.57 |
0.14 |
0.83 |
0.532 |
0.349 |
0.82 |
0.733 |
0.259 |
1.73 |
0.669 |
4.95 |
0.509 |
0.713 |
0.027 |
0.05 |
0.64 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.28 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.69 |
0.048 |
0.047 |
0.82 |
0.063 |
0.27 |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.2 |
0.023 |
0.14 |
0.22 |
0.2 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
1.82 |
4.09 |
2.01 |
85.9 |
0.45 |
4.83 |
1.38 |
1.22 |
9.48 |
4.49 |
0.605 |
20.6 |
4.26 |
40.3 |
4.11 |
12.7 |
5.809 |
0.685 |
0.67 |
0.816 |
0.9 |
0.301 |
0.15 |
0.156 |
0.13 |
0.278 |
0.143 |
0.519 |
0.357 |
1.1 |
0.124 |
0.511 |
|
Value achieved lower |
0.33 |
0.0051 |
0.005 |
0.013 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.026 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.246 |
0.505 |
0.511 |
2.99 |
0.414 |
0.029 |
0.104 |
0.171 |
0.33 |
0.78 |
0.192 |
0.548 |
0.072 |
0.015 |
0.01 |
0.038 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.14 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.079 |
0.013 |
0.025 |
0.36 |
0.12 |
0.043 |
0.05 |
0.11 |
0.012 |
0.16 |
0.062 |
0.046 |
0.043 |
0.378 |
2.12 |
0.382 |
23.4 |
1.55 |
0.16 |
0.36 |
1.67 |
1.99 |
5.31 |
0.528 |
4.05 |
0.232 |
2.44 |
0.169 |
0.249 |
0.241 |
0.51 |
0.05 |
0.136 |
0.012 |
0.047 |
0.027 |
0.14 |
0.261 |
0.09 |
0.148 |
0.031 |
|||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
94.0 |
100.0 |
94.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
94.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
94.0 |
97.0 |
94.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
100.0 |
94.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. After correction of the measurement uncertainty, the measurement value of 7.57 still complied with the maximum concentration. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. After correction of the measurement uncertainty, the measurement value of 85.9 still complied with the maximum concentration. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in the bivalve. |
Based on the measured concentrations in crustaceans, the percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit has been calculated. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
The percentage of exceedances of the maximum limit was calculated on the basis of the measured concentrations in fish meat. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
Gastropods: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Gastropods:at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Crustaceans: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Fish meat: at least 90% of the products comply with the maximum limits set in Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. |
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Type A |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
THRES
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Contamination levels meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined within the categories fish meat, crustacea and bivalve. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
Description overall status |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Contamination levels in the foodstuffs fish meat, crustaceans (shrimp, crab and lobster) and bivalve molluscs (mussels) meet the maximum limits set by the EU in at least 90% of the fishery products examined. This maintains the Good Environmental Status.
In four samples from fishery products the limits set at European level have been exceeded. This applies to sea bass, where the amount of mercury in two samples did not meet the maximum limit for consumption. In addition, too much mercury was found in a sample with crab and the lead concentration in one sample with shrimp was too high. Furthermore, all samples from fishery products tested complied with the limits set at European level. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |