Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D9 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Reported by | Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Water management, Ministry of infrastructure and the environment |
| Report date | 2019-04-15 |
| Report access | XML_ART8GES_201904091515.xml |
OSPAR Greater NorthSea (L1.2)
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Sum of benz (a) pyrene, benz (a) anthracene, benzo (b) fluoranthene and chrysene |
Total dioxins and furans (PCDD + PCDF) |
Element code |
CAS_50-32-8 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
EEA_33-58-9 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
SCB6 |
SUM4PAHs |
EEA_33-40-9 |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
molluscs
|
Crustaceans and molluscs
|
Fish fillets and other fish meat (minced or not), fresh, chilled or frozen.
|
fish meat (minced or not), fresh, chilled or frozen
|
Crustaceans and molluscs
|
Fish fillets and other fish meat (minced or not), fresh, chilled or frozen.
|
Fish fillets and other fish meat (minced or not), fresh, chilled or frozen.
|
fish meat (minced or not), fresh, chilled or frozen
|
molluscs
|
Fish fillets and other fish meat (minced or not), fresh, chilled or frozen.
|
Element 2 code |
0307
|
0306 en 0307
|
0304
|
0304
|
0306 en 0307
|
0304
|
0304
|
0304
|
0307
|
0304
|
Element 2 code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-MU
|
CONC-B-MU
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-MU
|
CONC-B-MU
|
CONC-B-MU
|
Concentration in biota
|
CONC-B-MU
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
6.0 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
6.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
35.0 |
3.5 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.72 |
0.05 |
0.0005 |
4.5 |
0.2 |
0.05 |
0.2 |
45.0 |
5.0 |
0.78 |
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
milligram per kilogram
|
milligram per kilogram
|
Other
|
milligram per kilogram
|
milligram per kilogram
|
milligram per kilogram
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
ng/g
|
pg TEQ / g product
|
ng/g
|
ng/g
|
pg TEQ / g product
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
The levels in all the samples examined are well below the relevant maximum levels (MLs), with which a good environmental status has been achieved. If policy remains unchanged, the Netherlands will be able to maintain this status in 2020 and beyond.
|
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Element 2 code comes from the common market organization for fishery and aquaculture products (CMO). The standards apply to specific fishery products, which is why the Netherlands does not report per species assessed.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
No integration
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
2016-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|