Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D1-F / Poland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection |
| Report date | 2020-01-28 |
| Report access | ART9_GES_PL.xml |
GES component |
D1
|
D1-F
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Features |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
GES description |
The populations of the species are not adversely affected due to anthropogenic pressures.
Threshold values established nationally |
The population of the species is not adversely affected due to anthropogenic pressures, such that its long-term viability is ensured.
Threshold values established nationally. |
The population abundance of the species is not adversely affected due to anthropogenic pressures, such that its long-term viability is ensured. Threshold values established nationally. |
The population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity, and survival rates) of the species are indicative of a healthy population which is not adversely affected due to anthropogenic pressures. Threshold values established nationally. |
The population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity, and survival rates) of the species are indicative of a healthy population which is not adversely affected due to anthropogenic pressures. Threshold values established nationally. |
||||
Determination date |
201809 |
201809 |
201809 |
201809 |
201809 |
||||
Update type |
Same as last reported determination |
New determination |
New determination |
Same as last reported determination |
New determination |
||||
Justification for non-use of criterion |
The criterion is not used since there are is a lack of data and appropriate monitoring programs to address the criterion. |
The criterion is not used since there are is a lack of data and appropriate monitoring programs to address the criterion. |
|||||||
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements |
|||||||||