Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Poland / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Poland |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection |
Report date | 2020-01-28 |
Report access | ART8_GES_PL_kor_URL.xml |
Polish part of FAO 27.3.D.24 area (BAL-POL-FAO27-3D24)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element code |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
Element code source |
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element 2 |
cod 24-32
|
cod 24-32
|
cod 24-32
|
European flounder 24-25
|
European flounder 24-25
|
European flounder 24-25
|
sprat 22-32
|
sprat 22-32
|
sprat 22-32
|
Element 2 code |
ICES-stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Parameter other |
|||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.26 |
570000.0 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
|||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.22 |
1176000.0 |
|||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
||||||||
Value unit other |
ratio
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||
Trend |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Fishing mortality rate has been assessed based on ICES advice. F1/Fmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been exceeding 1 value since 2012. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Fishing mortality rate has been assessed based on ICES advice. F1/Fmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been exceeding 1 since 2012. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
Spawning stock biomass has been assessed based on ICES advice. B1/Bmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been below 1 since 2013. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
95 percentile of length distribution decreased from 44 cm in 2011-2012 to 40 cm in 2013-2014. Current status is 43 cm. Recent increase in the index value may be caused by decrease of small fish index (below 30 cm) which may suggest that the recruitment has been poor during last 3 years. Due to decreasing condition and growth rate of cod also the L50 value decreases from 40 cm in 1991 to 20 cm in 2016. |
Laverage/Lf=m ratio is higher than the reference point indicating that fishing pressure is within limits. |
Biomass index is increasing since 2012.
|
95 percentile of length distribution decreased from 35 cm in 2011-2012 to 31 cm in 2014-2015. Current status is 32 cm. |
During assessment period 2011-2016 fishing mortality of sprat 22-32 has been decreasing. 2016 was the only year when fishing mortality of sprat achieved GES. The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
95 percentile of length distribution is stable and achieve 13.5-14 cm. |
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||
GES achieved |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polish part of FAO 27.3.D.25 area (BAL-POL-FAO27-3D25)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element code |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element 2 |
herring 25-29 and 32 Ex GoR
|
herring 25-29 and 32 Ex GoR
|
herring 25-29 and 32 Ex GoR
|
cod 24-32
|
cod 24-32
|
cod 24-32
|
European flounder 24-25
|
European flounder 24-25
|
European flounder 24-25
|
sprat 22-32
|
sprat 22-32
|
sprat 22-32
|
Element 2 code |
ICES-Stock
|
ICES-Stock
|
ICES-Stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.22 |
600000.0 |
0.26 |
570000.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.2 |
1200000.0 |
0.22 |
1176000.0 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
||||||||||
Value unit other |
ratio
|
ratio
|
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Fishing mortality rate has been assessed based on ICES advice. F1/Fmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been exceeding 1 value since 2012. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
|||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
95 percentile of length distribution is 21.5-22.5 cm. |
Fishing mortality rate has been assessed based on ICES advice. F1/Fmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been exceeding 1 since 2012. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
Spawning stock biomass has been assessed based on ICES advice. B1/Bmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been below 1 since 2013. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
95 percentile of length distribution decreased from 44 cm in 2011-2012 to 40 in 2013-2014. Current status is 43. Recent increase in the index value may be caused by decrease of small fish index (below 30 cm) which may suggest that the recruitment has been poor during last 3 years. Due to decreasing condition and growth rate of cod also the L50 value decreases from 40 cm in 1991 to 20 cm in 2016. |
Laverage/Lf=m ratio is higher than the reference point indicating that fishing pressure is within limits. |
Biomass index is increasing since 2012
|
95 percentile of length distribution decreased from 35 cm in 2011-2012 to 31 cm in 2014-2015. Current status is 32 cm. |
During assessment period 2011-2016 fishing mortality of sprat 22-32 has been decreasing. 2016 was the only year when fishing mortality of sprat achieved GES.The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
95 percentile of length distribution is stable and achieve 13.5-14 cm. |
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polish part of FAO 27.3.D.26 area (BAL-POL-FAO27-3D26)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element code |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element 2 |
herring 25-29 and 32 Ex GoR
|
herring 25-29 and 32 Ex GoR
|
herring 25-29 and 32 Ex GoR
|
cod 24-32
|
cod 24-32
|
cod 24-32
|
European flounder 26-28
|
European flounder 26-28
|
European flounder 26-28
|
sprat 22-32
|
sprat 22-32
|
sprat 22-32
|
Element 2 code |
ICES-Stock
|
ICES-Stock
|
ICES-Stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES-stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
ICES stock
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Parameter other |
||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.22 |
600000.0 |
0.26 |
570000.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.2 |
1200000.0 |
0.22 |
1176000.0 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
||||||||||
Value unit other |
ratio
|
ratio
|
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Fishing mortality rate has been assessed based on ICES advice. F1/Fmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been exceeding 1 value since 2012. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
|||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
95 percentile of length distribution is 21.5-22.5 cm. |
Fishing mortality rate has been assessed based on ICES advice. F1/Fmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been exceeding 1 since 2012. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
Spawning stock biomass has been assessed based on ICES advice. B1/Bmsy ratio based on SPiCT model has been below 1 since 2013. This leads to the conclusion on to high fishing pressure on the stock. |
95 percentile of length distribution decreased from 44 cm in 2011-2012 to 40 in 2013-2014. Current status is 43. Recent increase in the index value may be caused by decrease of small fish index (below 30 cm) which may suggest that the recruitment has been poor during last 3 years. Due to decreasing condition and growth rate of cod also the L50 value decreases from 40 cm in 1991 to 20 cm in 2016. |
During assessment period 2011-2016 fishing mortality of sprat 22-32 has been decreasing. 2016 was the only year when fishing mortality of sprat achieved GES.The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
The final assessment values reflect the state in 2016. |
95 percentile of length distribution is stable and achieve 13.5-14 cm. |
|||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Since stock assessment was not based on analytical models the was not included in the final assessment of Descriptor 3. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
Stock assessment was based on 2 criteria D3C1 and D3C2. OOAO principle was applied to aggregate the results. |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
Assessment was based on 2 criteria: D3C1 and D3C2 assessed separately for each stock. For fish stock to achieve GES both of the criteria need to be in GES. |
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Overall status assessment has been performed on stock level. Stock assessments were not aggregated into overall assessments. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|