Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / Poland / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | Poland |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection |
Report date | 2020-01-28 |
Report access | ART8_GES_PL_kor_URL.xml |
Polish part of Opensea Bornholm Basin (L2-SEA-007-POL)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Littoral rock and biogenic reef |
Littoral sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenLitRock |
HabBenLitSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Parameter other |
||||
Threshold value upper |
0.8 |
3.18 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Not applicable
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
0.88 |
2.7 |
20.0 |
1.0 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|
Value unit other |
Ratio
|
%
|
%
|
|
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Description parameter |
No threshold values established at EU level
|
Assessment based on expert judgement
|
||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Description criteria |
Assessment of the state of macrofaunal communities was performed for the whole assessment unit based on national macrozoobentic index B. |
Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 20% of total disturbance of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 1% of total loss of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
|
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration was applied for macrofaunal index B characterizing soft bottom benthic broad habitats and macrophyte index SM1 characterizing hard bottom broad habitats. |
No integration was applied for macrofaunal index B characterizing soft bottom benthic broad habitats and macrophyte index SM1 characterizing hard bottom broad habitats. |
||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Physical disturbance of the seabed is defined as the change in the bottom of the sea, which can be restored, if the activity causing the interference ceases. For activities that may cause physical disturbance of the seabed is believed to build in the sea or along the shoreline, sand and gravel extraction, dredging and dredged material storage, as well as maritime transport and trawling. Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 20% of total disturbance of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
The physical loss of the seabed is defined as the change in the substrate or seabed morphology, which lasted or will last for up to two cycles of the marine strategy (12 years) or more of their number by Decision 2017/848. Among the human activities that may cause the loss of physical seabed lists: building in the sea or along the shoreline, sand and gravel extraction, dredging and landfilling. Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 1% of total loss of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Polish part of Opensea Gdansk Basin (L2-SEA-008-POL)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Littoral sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenLitSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||
Element 2 code |
|||
Element 2 code source |
|||
Element source |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Parameter other |
|||
Threshold value upper |
3.18 |
||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Not applicable
|
|
Threshold value source other |
|||
Value achieved upper |
1.33 |
20.0 |
1.0 |
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
|
Value unit other |
%
|
%
|
|
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Description parameter |
No threshold values established at EU level
|
Assessment based on expert judgement
|
|
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Description criteria |
It has been assessed as ca. 20% of the seabed disturbance of MRU |
Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 1% of total loss of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
||
Description element |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
|||
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Physical disturbance of the seabed is defined as the change in the bottom of the sea, which can be restored, if the activity causing the interference ceases. For activities that may cause physical disturbance of the seabed is believed to build in the sea or along the shoreline, sand and gravel extraction, dredging and dredged material storage, as well as maritime transport and trawling. It has been assessed as ca. 20% of the seabed disturbance if MRU |
The physical loss of the seabed is defined as the change in the substrate or seabed morphology, which lasted or will last for up to two cycles of the marine strategy (12 years) or more of their number by Decision 2017/848. Among the human activities that may cause the loss of physical seabed lists: building in the sea or along the shoreline, sand and gravel extraction, dredging and landfilling. Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 1% of total loss of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Polish part of Opensea Eastern Gotland Basin (L2-SEA-009-POL)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Littoral sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenLitSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||
Element 2 code |
|||
Element 2 code source |
|||
Element source |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Parameter other |
|||
Threshold value upper |
3.18 |
||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Not applicable
|
|
Threshold value source other |
|||
Value achieved upper |
2.86 |
20.0 |
1.0 |
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
|
Value unit other |
%
|
%
|
|
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Description parameter |
No threshold values established at EU level
|
Assessment based on expert judgement
|
|
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Description criteria |
It has been assessed as 20% of total physical disturbance to the seabed of the marine reporting unit. |
Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 1% of total loss of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
||
Description element |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
|||
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
|
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Physical disturbance of the seabed is defined as the change in the bottom of the sea, which can be restored, if the activity causing the interference ceases. For activities that may cause physical disturbance of the seabed is believed to build in the sea or along the shoreline, sand and gravel extraction, dredging and dredged material storage, as well as maritime transport and trawling. Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 20% of total loss of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
The physical loss of the seabed is defined as the change in the substrate or seabed morphology, which lasted or will last for up to two cycles of the marine strategy (12 years) or more of their number by Decision 2017/848. Among the human activities that may cause the loss of physical seabed lists: building in the sea or along the shoreline, sand and gravel extraction, dredging and landfilling. Overall assessment has been done in a descriptive form on the basis of information from various sources. It has been assessed as 1% of total loss of the sea bed of the marine reporting unit. |
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL TW I WB 9 very sheltered, fully mixed, substratum: silt/sandy silt/silty sand; ice cover >90 days, water rwesidence time 52 days (L4-POL-001)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||||
Element 2 code |
|||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
0.123 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||
Value achieved upper |
1.2 |
2.52 |
0.027 |
1.2 |
|
Value achieved lower |
|||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
|||
Value unit other |
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
4.7 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. No physical disturbances have been identified. |
No physical disturbances have been identified
|
|||
Related indicator |
|||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
No physical disturbances have been identified.
|
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience - PL_WskZm) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
|||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||
GES extent unit |
|||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
No physical disturbances have been identified.
|
4.7 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
|||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL TW I WB 8 very sheltered, fully mixed, substratum: silt/sandy silt/silty sand; ice cover >90 days, water rwesidence time 52 days (L4-POL-002)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||||
Element 2 code |
|||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
||
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
0.123 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||
Value achieved upper |
60.0 |
2.52 |
0.036 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
Value achieved lower |
|||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
||
Value unit other |
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||||
Related indicator |
|||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
|||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||
GES extent unit |
|||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Not relevant |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL TW I WB 1 very sheltered, fully mixed, substratum: silt/sandy silt/silty sand; ice cover >90 days, water rwesidence time 52 days (L4-POL-003)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||||
Element 2 code |
|||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C1
|
D6C2
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
||
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
0.123 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||
Value achieved upper |
60.0 |
1.15 |
0.029 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
Value achieved lower |
|||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
||
Value unit other |
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||
Related indicator |
|||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
|||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||
GES extent unit |
|||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Water body designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL TW II WB 2 very sheltered, fully mixed, substratum: lagoonal fine snd medium grained sand/silty sand; residence time 138 day, ice cover >90 days (L4-POL-004)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
|||||
Element 2 code |
|||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
B-index
|
index
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
0.8 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||
Value achieved upper |
8.48 |
2.92 |
0.69 |
0.19 |
8.29 |
Value achieved lower |
|||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Value unit other |
index
|
index
|
|||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
21.96 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 1.3 km of the water body coastline has been temporarily altered due to beach nourishment. |
||||
Related indicator |
|||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Values achieved of index B and index SM1 were normalized according to the method applied in the HELCOM second holistic assessment of the Baltic Sea (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/). The weighted averaging was applied to normalized values with 50% weight coefficient providing BQRs.The resulting BQRs (biological quality ratios) were compared with the threshold value of 0.6 indicating good environmental status. |
Values achieved of index B and index SM1 were normalized according to the method applied in the HELCOM second holistic assessment of the Baltic Sea (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/). The weighted averaging was applied to normalized values with 50% weight coefficient providing BQRs.The resulting BQRs (biological quality ratios) were compared with the threshold value of 0.6 indicating good environmental status. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results (PL_WskZm) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience - PL_WskZm) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
|||||
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
Values achieved of index B and index SM1 were normalized according to the method applied in the HELCOM second holistic assessment of the Baltic Sea (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/). The weighted averaging was applied to normalized values with 50% weight coefficient providing BQRs.The resulting BQRs (biological quality ratios) were compared with the threshold value of 0.6 indicating good environmental status. |
Values achieved of index B and index SM1 were normalized according to the method applied in the HELCOM second holistic assessment of the Baltic Sea (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/). The weighted averaging was applied to normalized values with 50% weight coefficient providing BQRs.The resulting BQRs (biological quality ratios) were compared with the threshold value of 0.6 indicating good environmental status. |
Values achieved of index B and index SM1 were normalized according to the method applied in the HELCOM second holistic assessment of the Baltic Sea (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/). The weighted averaging was applied to normalized values with 50% weight coefficient providing BQRs.The resulting BQRs (biological quality ratios) were compared with the threshold value of 0.6 indicating good environmental status. |
||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||
GES extent unit |
|||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
1.3 km of the water body coastline has been temporarily altered due to beach nourishment. |
21.960 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
|||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL TW III WB 3 partly protected, partly stratified, substratum: medium grained sand/pebbles/marine silty sand; ice-incidental (L4-POL-005)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Littoral sediment |
Littoral sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenLitSed |
HabBenLitSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
0.8 |
0.8 |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.74 |
0.74 |
5.11 |
2.69 |
2.15 |
2.96 |
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|||
Value unit other |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
99.0 |
100.0 |
|
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
10.94 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 18.2 sq. km has been altered temporarily, and 4.29 km due to beach nourishment. |
|||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Assessment of the state of macrofaunal communities was performed for the whole assessment unit based on national macrozoobentic index B. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
18.2 sq. km has been altered temporarily, and 4.29 km due to beach nourishment. |
10.94 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL TW IV WB 4 partly stratified, moderately exposed, substratum: sand/silt; ice - incidental (L4-POL-006)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Littoral sediment |
Littoral sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenLitSed |
HabBenLitSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
0.46 |
2.6 |
0.16 |
0.3 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
1.97 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 2.58 km of the water body coastline has been temporarily altered due to beach nourishment. |
The value of PL_WskZm was equal 0.16%
|
The value of PL_WskZm was equal 0.3%
|
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Assessment of the state of macrofaunal communities was performed for the whole assessment unit based on national macrozoobentic index B. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results (PL_WskZm) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
2.58 km of the water body coastline has been temporarily altered due to beach nourishment. |
1.97 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL TW V WB 6 river mouth, partly stratified, partly sheltered, substratum: medium grained sand/silty sand (L4-POL-007)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
60.0 |
2.59 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL TW V WB 5 river mouth, partly stratified, partly sheltered, substratum: medium grained sand/silty sand (L4-POL-008)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenCircalitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
60.0 |
2.32 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL TW V WB 7 river mouth, partly stratified, partly sheltered, substratum: medium grained sand/silty sand (L4-POL-009)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
60.0 |
3.11 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL CWI WB2 coastal waters, moderately exposed, fully mixed, substratum:sand/fine sand (L4-POL-010)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
6.37 |
3.49 |
2.9 |
3.47 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
13.88 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 23.2 km of the water body coastline has been temporarily altered due to beach nourishment. |
PL_WskZm = 2.9%
|
PL_WskZm = 3.47%
|
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
|
Element status |
Good |
Good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
|||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
23.2 km of the water body coastline has been temporarily altered due to beach nourishment. |
13.88 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL CWI WB1 coastal waters, moderately exposed, fully mixed, substratum:sand/fine sand (L4-POL-011)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenCircalitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
2.22 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
No physical loss of the sea bed has been identified. No physical disturbances have been identified. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
No physical disturbances have been identified.
|
No physical loss of the sea bed has been identified. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
No physical disturbances have been identified.
|
No physical loss of the sea bed has been identified. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL CWI WB3 coastal waters, moderately exposed, fully mixed, substratum:sand/fine sand (L4-POL-012)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitMud |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
60.0 |
2.04 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
Water body is designated as Heavily Modified Water Body, so not achieving GES. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL CW II WB 8 central Polish coast, coastal waters, exposed, fully mixed, substratum: sand/pebbles/gravel (L4-POL-013)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
6.47 |
2.16 |
0.9 |
5.57 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
43.75 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 9.1 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
9.1 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
43.75 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL CW II WB 6W central Polish coast, coastal waters, exposed, fully mixed, substratum: sand/pebbles/gravel (L4-POL-014)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
1.2 |
3.48 |
1.2 |
|
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
1.86 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. No physical disturbances have been identified. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. No physical disturbances have been identified. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. PL_WskZm = 1.2% |
|
Element status |
Good |
Good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
No physical disturbances have been identified.
|
1.86 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL CW II WB 6E central Polish coast, coastal waters, exposed, fully mixed, substratum: sand/pebbles/gravel (L4-POL-015)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
0.8 |
0.8 |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.74 |
0.74 |
1.82 |
2.91 |
0.5 |
1.32 |
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|||
Value unit other |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
3.27 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 1.5 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
PL_WskZm = 0.5%
|
PL_WskZm = 1.32%
|
|||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
|||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
1.5 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
3.27 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Gotland Basin - PL CWII WB5 central Polish coast, coastal waters, exposed, fully mixed, substratum: sand/pebbles/gravel (L4-POL-016)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
1.06 |
3.38 |
0.1 |
0.96 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
3.17 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 1.5 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. PL_WskZm = 0.1% |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. PL_WskZm = 0.96% |
|
Element status |
Good |
Good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
1.5 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
3.17 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Gdansk Basin - PL CWII WB4 central Polish coast, coastal waters, exposed, fully mixed, substratum: sand/pebbles/gravel (L4-POL-017)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
2.05 |
3.21 |
2.05 |
|
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
1.95 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. No physical disturbances have been identified. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. No physical disturbances have been identified. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
|
Element status |
Good |
Good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
No physical disturbances have been identified.
|
1.95 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL CW III WB 9 central Polish coast, coastal waters, exposed, fully mixed, substratum: sand/pebbles/gravel (L4-POL-018)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenCircalitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
3.17 |
2.56 |
0.14 |
3.03 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
1.81 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 0.55 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience - PL_WskZm) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results (the changes of the ecosystem resilience - PL_WskZm) have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
0.55 km of the water body coastline has been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
1.81 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Bornholm Basin - PL CW III WB 7 central Polish coast, coastal waters, exposed, fully mixed, substratum: sand/pebbles/gravel (L4-POL-019)
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
||
Element code |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenInfralitSand |
||
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
National |
National |
||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
PL_WskZm
|
|
Threshold value upper |
10.0 |
3.18 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
National
|
National
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
9.37 |
2.16 |
0.16 |
9.21 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
50.5 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. 1.1 km of the water body coastline and an area of 0.02 sq. km have been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
PL_WskZm = 0.16%
|
PL_WskZm = 9.21%
|
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. The criterion is a sum of results of criteria D6C1 and D6C2. All identified temporal and permanent physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criterion value is assessed in accordance with national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified temporal physical pressures (beach nourishment, sea bed disturbance, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index’ of pressure for the ecosystem. Obtained values have been summed up. Resulted values were divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. The results have been expressed in percent and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
The criteria value is assessed on the basis of national methodology for hydromorphological classification of WFD transitional and coastal waters. All identified permanent physical pressures (piers, coastal defence constructions, permanent coast line alteration, etc.) have been assessed applying the so called ‘importance index of pressure’ for the ecosystem, then obtained values have been summed up and divided either by the length of coast line or by an area of the water body. Obtained results have been expressed in percent (PL_WskZm) and next compared to the threshold values, i.e. 5% changes for very good status and 10% for good status. The latter one has been applied as a threshold value for GES. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
1.1 km of the water body coastline and an area of 0.02 sq. km have been altered temporarily due to beach nourishment. |
50.5 km of the coastline of the water body has been modified permanently. |
||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2015 |
2015 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|