Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D7 / Poland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D7 Hydrographical changes |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | National Water Management Authority |
| Report date | 2015-11-20 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20160226_150132.xml |
BAL-PL-AA-27, BAL-PL-AA-33, BAL-PL-AA-35, BAL-PL-AA-35A, BAL-PL-AA-36, BAL-PL-AA-38, BAL-PL-AA-38A, BAL-PL-AA-62, BAL-PL-MS-001
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D7 |
7.1.1 |
7.2.1 |
7.2.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D7
|
D7C1
|
D7C2
|
D7C2
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
Method used |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
Description [Targets] |
Limitation of operation in field of hydrographic alterations to minimize its negative impact on the marine ecosystems. |
|||
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
||||
Reference point type |
LimitReferencePoint |
LimitReferencePoint |
LimitReferencePoint |
LimitReferencePoint |
Baseline |
To be determined.
|
To be determined.
|
To be determined.
|
To be determined.
|
Proportion |
-8888 |
-8888 |
-8888 |
-8888 |
Assessment method |
Adopted hydromorphologic methodology. |
Adopted hydromorphologic methodology. |
Adopted hydromorphologic methodology. |
Adopted hydromorphologic methodology. |
Development status |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Type of target/indicator |
Impact |
Impact |
Impact |
Impact |
Timescale |
2020-12 |
|||
Interim or GES target |
Interim |
|||
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
Targets are compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements |
Indicator is in conformity with WFD requirements.
|
Indicator is in conformity with WFD requirements.
|
Indicator is in conformity with WFD requirements.
|
Physical/chemical features |
||||
Predominant habitats |
||||
Functional group |
||||
Pressures |