Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-R / Portugal / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Reptiles
Member State Portugal
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Reported by DGRM
Report date 2021-03-03
Report access ART8_GES_PT_setembro2020.xml

Portuguese Continent Subdivision (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)

GES component
D1-R
D1-R
D1-R
D1-R
D1-R
D1-R
D1-R
D1-R
Feature
Turtles
Turtles
Turtles
Turtles
Turtles
Turtles
Turtles
Turtles
Element
Caretta caretta
Caretta caretta
Caretta caretta
Caretta caretta
Dermochelys coriacea
Dermochelys coriacea
Dermochelys coriacea
Dermochelys coriacea
Element code
137205
137205
137205
137205
137209
137209
137209
137209
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Element 2 code
1224
1224
1224
1224
1223
1223
1223
1223
Element 2 code source
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000species/view
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D1C1
D1C2
D1C4
D1C5
D1C1
D1C2
D1C4
D1C5
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
No
No
Description parameter
Criterion assessed on the basis of the precautionary principle, on the basis of data from strandings. The size of populations is unknown.
Criterion assessed on the basis of the precautionary principle, on the basis of data from strandings. The size of populations is unknown.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Information available for marine reptiles is scarce and inadequate for the assessment of this animal room. This group of species has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). It has not been possible to estimate stock abundance values for Portuguese continental waters.
Information available for marine reptiles is scarce and inadequate for the assessment of this animal room. This group of species has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012).
Information available for marine reptiles is scarce and inadequate for the assessment of this animal room. This group of species has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012).
Information available for marine reptiles is scarce and inadequate for the assessment of this animal room. This group of species has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). It has not been possible to estimate stock abundance values for Portuguese continental waters. .
Information available for marine reptiles is scarce and inadequate for the assessment of this animal room. This group of species has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012).
Information available for marine reptiles is scarce and inadequate for the assessment of this animal room. This group of species has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012).
Element status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description element
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria. Element source
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria. Element source
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria. Element source
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria. Element source
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria.
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria.
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria.
The element was not assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
The information available for species belonging to this group is very low. The GES of this group has not been assessed because the information was considered insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria at the level of the species (this species group has not been assessed under the Habitats Directive (2007-2012). Considering that it is the scale ecologically relevant for this species group as proposed in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848. In this case, and for all two species considered, the assessment area coincides with its distribution area in national waters.
Assessments period
2012-2107
2012-2107
2012-2107
2012-2107
2012-2107
2012-2107
2012-2107
2012-2107
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets