Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Portugal / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast |
| Reported by | DGRM |
| Report date | 2021-03-03 |
| Report access | ART8_GES_PT_setembro2020.xml |
Portuguese Continent Subdivision (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Aphanopus carbo |
Aphanopus carbo |
Aphanopus carbo |
Argyrosomus regius |
Argyrosomus regius |
Argyrosomus regius |
Aristaeopsis edwardsiana |
Aristaeopsis edwardsiana |
Aristaeopsis edwardsiana |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Aristeus antennatus |
Auxis rochei |
Auxis rochei |
Auxis rochei |
Beryx spp. |
Beryx spp. |
Beryx spp. |
Boops boops |
Boops boops |
Boops boops |
Conger conger |
Conger conger |
Conger conger |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicologlossa cuneata |
Dicologlossa cuneata |
Dicologlossa cuneata |
Diplodus sargus sargus |
Diplodus sargus sargus |
Diplodus sargus sargus |
Diplodus vulgaris |
Diplodus vulgaris |
Diplodus vulgaris |
Donax trunculus |
Donax trunculus |
Donax trunculus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Euthynnus alletteratus |
Euthynnus alletteratus |
Euthynnus alletteratus |
Galeus melastomus |
Galeus melastomus |
Galeus melastomus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Istiophorus albicans |
Istiophorus albicans |
Istiophorus albicans |
Isurus oxyrinchus |
Isurus oxyrinchus |
Isurus oxyrinchus |
Kajikia albida |
Kajikia albida |
Kajikia albida |
Lepidorhombus boscii |
Lepidorhombus boscii |
Lepidorhombus boscii |
Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis |
Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis |
Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis |
Leucoraja naevus |
Leucoraja naevus |
Leucoraja naevus |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius budegassa |
Lophius piscatorius |
Lophius piscatorius |
Lophius piscatorius |
Makaira nigrican |
Makaira nigrican |
Makaira nigrican |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Microchirus spp. |
Microchirus spp. |
Microchirus spp. |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Octopus vulgaris |
Pagellus acarne |
Pagellus acarne |
Pagellus acarne |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagrus pagrus |
Pagrus pagrus |
Pagrus pagrus |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Parapenaeus longirostris |
Phycis blennoides |
Phycis blennoides |
Phycis blennoides |
Phycis phycis |
Phycis phycis |
Phycis phycis |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Polyprion americanus |
Polyprion americanus |
Polyprion americanus |
Prionace glauca |
Prionace glauca |
Prionace glauca |
Raja brachyura |
Raja brachyura |
Raja brachyura |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Raja undulata |
Raja undulata |
Raja undulata |
Sarda sarda |
Sarda sarda |
Sarda sarda |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Scomber colias |
Scomber colias |
Scomber colias |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Solea senegalensis |
Solea senegalensis |
Solea senegalensis |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Sparus aurata |
Sparus aurata |
Sparus aurata |
Spisula solida |
Spisula solida |
Spisula solida |
Thunnus alalunga |
Thunnus alalunga |
Thunnus alalunga |
Thunnus albacares |
Thunnus albacares |
Thunnus albacares |
Thunnus obesus |
Thunnus obesus |
Thunnus obesus |
Thunnus thynnus |
Thunnus thynnus |
Thunnus thynnus |
Trachurus picturatus |
Trachurus picturatus |
Trachurus picturatus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trisopterus luscus |
Trisopterus luscus |
Trisopterus luscus |
Xiphias gladius |
Xiphias gladius |
Xiphias gladius |
Zeus faber |
Zeus faber |
Zeus faber |
Element code |
127085 |
127085 |
127085 |
127007 |
127007 |
127007 |
240796 |
240796 |
240796 |
107083 |
107083 |
107083 |
236487 |
236487 |
236487 |
125700 |
125700 |
125700 |
127047 |
127047 |
127047 |
126285 |
126285 |
126285 |
126975 |
126975 |
126975 |
127154 |
127154 |
127154 |
223863 |
223863 |
223863 |
127054 |
127054 |
127054 |
139602 |
139602 |
139602 |
126426 |
126426 |
126426 |
127017 |
127017 |
127017 |
105812 |
105812 |
105812 |
127251 |
127251 |
127251 |
126949 |
126949 |
126949 |
105839 |
105839 |
105839 |
712906 |
712906 |
712906 |
127145 |
127145 |
127145 |
127146 |
127146 |
127146 |
105876 |
105876 |
105876 |
140271 |
140271 |
140271 |
126554 |
126554 |
126554 |
126555 |
126555 |
126555 |
126950 |
126950 |
126950 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126484 |
126484 |
126484 |
126129 |
126129 |
126129 |
126439 |
126439 |
126439 |
126986 |
126986 |
126986 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
140605 |
140605 |
140605 |
127057 |
127057 |
127057 |
127059 |
127059 |
127059 |
127063 |
127063 |
127063 |
107109 |
107109 |
107109 |
126501 |
126501 |
126501 |
126502 |
126502 |
126502 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
126440 |
126440 |
126440 |
126998 |
126998 |
126998 |
105801 |
105801 |
105801 |
367297 |
367297 |
367297 |
105883 |
105883 |
105883 |
105887 |
105887 |
105887 |
105891 |
105891 |
105891 |
127021 |
127021 |
127021 |
126421 |
126421 |
126421 |
151174 |
151174 |
151174 |
127023 |
127023 |
127023 |
105814 |
105814 |
105814 |
138477 |
138477 |
138477 |
127159 |
127159 |
127159 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
151523 |
151523 |
151523 |
140301 |
140301 |
140301 |
127026 |
127026 |
127026 |
127027 |
127027 |
127027 |
127028 |
127028 |
127028 |
127029 |
127029 |
127029 |
126821 |
126821 |
126821 |
126822 |
126822 |
126822 |
126445 |
126445 |
126445 |
127094 |
127094 |
127094 |
127427 |
127427 |
127427 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) in subareas 1, 2, 4, 6–8, 10, and 14, and in divisions 3.a, 5.a–b, 9.a, and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic) |
Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) in subareas 1, 2, 4, 6–8, 10, and 14, and in divisions 3.a, 5.a–b, 9.a, and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic) |
Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) in subareas 1, 2, 4, 6–8, 10, and 14, and in divisions 3.a, 5.a–b, 9.a, and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic) |
Corvina-reserved (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Corvina-reserved (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Corvina-reserved (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Shrimp (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths exceeding 600 m
|
Shrimp (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths exceeding 600 m
|
Shrimp (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths exceeding 600 m
|
Blue and red shrimp (ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths exceeding 400 m
|
Blue and red shrimp (ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths exceeding 400 m
|
Blue and red shrimp (ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths exceeding 400 m
|
Frigate tuna (Atlantic)
|
Frigate tuna (Atlantic)
|
Frigate tuna (Atlantic)
|
Alfonsinos/golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Alfonsinos/golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Alfonsinos/golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Boga (ABI-EN-CONT) at depths less than 200 m
|
Boga (ABI-EN-CONT) at depths less than 200 m
|
Boga (ABI-EN-CONT) at depths less than 200 m
|
Conger (ABI-EN-CONT) in depths less than 400 m
|
Conger (ABI-EN-CONT) in depths less than 400 m
|
Conger (ABI-EN-CONT) in depths less than 400 m
|
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (southern Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (southern Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (southern Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Language (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Language (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Language (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Common seabream (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Common seabream (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Common seabream (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Two-banded seabream (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 100 m
|
Two-banded seabream (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 100 m
|
Two-banded seabream (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 100 m
|
Concapsise (ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-C)
|
Concapsise (ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-C)
|
Concapsise (ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-C)
|
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Merma (Atlantic)
|
Merma (Atlantic)
|
Merma (Atlantic)
|
Black-mouthed dogfish (Galeus melastomus) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Black-mouthed dogfish (Galeus melastomus) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Black-mouthed dogfish (Galeus melastomus) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Blackbelly rosefish (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Blackbelly rosefish (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Blackbelly rosefish (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Atlantic sailfish (Eastern Atlantic)
|
Atlantic sailfish (Eastern Atlantic)
|
Atlantic sailfish (Eastern Atlantic)
|
Shortfin mako (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Shortfin mako (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Shortfin mako (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
White marlin (Atlantic)
|
White marlin (Atlantic)
|
White marlin (Atlantic)
|
Four-spot megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (southern Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters East) |
Four-spot megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (southern Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters East) |
Four-spot megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (southern Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters East) |
Megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Vinho Verde (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Vinho Verde (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Vinho Verde (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea, Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea, Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea, Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Monkfish (Lophius piscatorius) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea, Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Monkfish (Lophius piscatorius) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea, Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Monkfish (Lophius piscatorius) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea, Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Blue marlin (Atlantic)
|
Blue marlin (Atlantic)
|
Blue marlin (Atlantic)
|
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in divisions 8.c and 9.a, Southern stock (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in divisions 8.c and 9.a, Southern stock (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in divisions 8.c and 9.a, Southern stock (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Razor NEP (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Razor NEP (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Razor NEP (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in subareas 6 and 8, and in divisions 7.a–c, 7.e–k, and 9.a (North Sea, Bay of Biscay, southern Celtic Seas, and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in subareas 6 and 8, and in divisions 7.a–c, 7.e–k, and 9.a (North Sea, Bay of Biscay, southern Celtic Seas, and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in subareas 6 and 8, and in divisions 7.a–c, 7.e–k, and 9.a (North Sea, Bay of Biscay, southern Celtic Seas, and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, Functional Unit 30 (Atlantic Iberian waters East and Gulf of Cadiz) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, Functional Unit 30 (Atlantic Iberian waters East and Gulf of Cadiz) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, Functional Unit 30 (Atlantic Iberian waters East and Gulf of Cadiz) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, functional units 26–27 (Atlantic Iberian waters East, western Galicia, and northern Portugal) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, functional units 26–27 (Atlantic Iberian waters East, western Galicia, and northern Portugal) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, functional units 26–27 (Atlantic Iberian waters East, western Galicia, and northern Portugal) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, functional units 28–29 (Atlantic Iberian waters East and southwestern and southern Portugal) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, functional units 28–29 (Atlantic Iberian waters East and southwestern and southern Portugal) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 9.a, functional units 28–29 (Atlantic Iberian waters East and southwestern and southern Portugal) |
Polling (ABI-TA-A-BV, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-A-CONT-C)
|
Polling (ABI-TA-A-BV, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-A-CONT-C)
|
Polling (ABI-TA-A-BV, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-A-CONT-C)
|
Support (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 100 m
|
Support (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 100 m
|
Support (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 100 m
|
Red (=blackspot) seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in Subarea 9 (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Red (=blackspot) seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in Subarea 9 (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Red (=blackspot) seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in Subarea 9 (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Legitimate (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Legitimate (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Legitimate (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Deepwater rose shrimp (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 400 m
|
Deepwater rose shrimp (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 400 m
|
Deepwater rose shrimp (ABI-TA-A-UP and ABI-A-CONT-C) at depths less than 400 m
|
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Forkbeard (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Forkbeard (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Forkbeard (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 8 and Division 9.a (Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Cherna (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Cherna (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Cherna (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Blue shark (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Blue shark (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Blue shark (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Undulate ray (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Undulate ray (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Undulate ray (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Atlantic bass
|
Atlantic bass
|
Atlantic bass
|
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Mackerel (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Mackerel (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Mackerel (ABI-EN-CONT)
|
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1–8 and 14, and in Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1–8 and 14, and in Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1–8 and 14, and in Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Common cuttlefish (ABI-TA-AUA, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TTA-CONT-C)
|
Common cuttlefish (ABI-TA-AUA, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TTA-CONT-C)
|
Common cuttlefish (ABI-TA-AUA, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TTA-CONT-C)
|
Sole (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Sole (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Sole (ABI-PT-CONT)
|
Sole (Solea solea) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Sole (Solea solea) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Sole (Solea solea) in divisions 8.c and 9.a (Cantabrian Sea and Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Gilthead seabream (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Gilthead seabream (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Gilthead seabream (ABI-PT-SD-CONT)
|
Surf clam (ABI-TA-A-AGAINST, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-A-CONT-C)
|
Surf clam (ABI-TA-A-AGAINST, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-A-CONT-C)
|
Surf clam (ABI-TA-A-AGAINST, ABI-A-CONA-UP and ABI-TA-CONT-A-CONT-C)
|
Albacore tuna (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Albacore tuna (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Albacore tuna (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Yellowfin tuna
|
Yellowfin tuna
|
Yellowfin tuna
|
Bigeye Tuna (Atlantic)
|
Bigeye Tuna (Atlantic)
|
Bigeye Tuna (Atlantic)
|
Bluefin tuna (Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean)
|
Bluefin tuna (Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean)
|
Bluefin tuna (Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean)
|
Blue jack mackerel (ABI-EN-CONT) at depths less than 400 m
|
Blue jack mackerel (ABI-EN-CONT) at depths less than 400 m
|
Blue jack mackerel (ABI-EN-CONT) at depths less than 400 m
|
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) |
Pouting (ABI-TA-A-BV) in depths of less than 200 m
|
Pouting (ABI-TA-A-BV) in depths of less than 200 m
|
Pouting (ABI-TA-A-BV) in depths of less than 200 m
|
Swordfish (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Swordfish (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Swordfish (North Atlantic (> 5° N))
|
Redfish (ABI-EN-CONT) in depths less than 400 m
|
Redfish (ABI-EN-CONT) in depths less than 400 m
|
Redfish (ABI-EN-CONT) in depths less than 400 m
|
Element 2 code |
bsf.27.nea
|
bsf.27.nea
|
bsf.27.nea
|
mgr
|
mgr
|
mgr
|
ssh
|
ssh
|
ssh
|
ara
|
ara
|
ara
|
ICCAT-BLT
|
ICCAT-BLT
|
ICCAT-BLT
|
alf 27.nea
|
alf 27.nea
|
alf 27.nea
|
bog
|
bog
|
bog
|
coe
|
coe
|
coe
|
bss
|
bss
|
bss
|
cet
|
cet
|
cet
|
swa
|
swa
|
swa
|
ctb
|
ctb
|
ctb
|
dxl
|
dxl
|
dxl
|
ane.27.9a
|
ane.27.9a
|
ane.27.9a
|
ICCAT-LTA
|
ICCAT-LTA
|
ICCAT-LTA
|
sho.27.89a
|
sho.27.89a
|
sho.27.89a
|
brf
|
brf
|
brf
|
ICCAT-SAI-E
|
ICCAT-SAI-E
|
ICCAT-SAI-E
|
ICCAT-SMA-N
|
ICCAT-SMA-N
|
ICCAT-SMA-N
|
ICCAT-WHM
|
ICCAT-WHM
|
ICCAT-WHM
|
ldb.27.8c9a
|
ldb.27.8c9a
|
ldb.27.8c9a
|
meg.27.8c9a
|
meg.27.8c9a
|
meg.27.8c9a
|
rjn.27.9a
|
rjn.27.9a
|
rjn.27.9a
|
sqr
|
sqr
|
sqr
|
ank.27.8c9a
|
ank.27.8c9a
|
ank.27.8c9a
|
mon.27.8c9a
|
mon.27.8c9a
|
mon.27.8c9a
|
ICCAT-BUM
|
ICCAT-BUM
|
ICCAT-BUM
|
whg.27.89a
|
whg.27.89a
|
whg.27.89a
|
hke.27.8c9a
|
hke.27.8c9a
|
hke.27.8c9a
|
ths
|
ths
|
ths
|
whb.27.1-91214
|
whb.27.1-91214
|
whb.27.1-91214
|
mur
|
mur
|
mur
|
nep.fu.30
|
nep.fu.30
|
nep.fu.30
|
nep.fu.2627
|
nep.fu.2627
|
nep.fu.2627
|
nep.fu.2829
|
nep.fu.2829
|
nep.fu.2829
|
occ
|
occ
|
occ
|
sba
|
sba
|
sba
|
sbr.27.9
|
sbr.27.9
|
sbr.27.9
|
rpg
|
rpg
|
rpg
|
dps
|
dps
|
dps
|
gfb.27.nea
|
gfb.27.nea
|
gfb.27.nea
|
for
|
for
|
for
|
ple.27.89a
|
ple.27.89a
|
ple.27.89a
|
pol.27.89a
|
pol.27.89a
|
pol.27.89a
|
wrf
|
wrf
|
wrf
|
ICCAT-BSH-N
|
ICCAT-BSH-N
|
ICCAT-BSH-N
|
rjh.27.9a
|
rjh.27.9a
|
rjh.27.9a
|
rjc.27.9a
|
rjc.27.9a
|
rjc.27.9a
|
rjm.27.9a
|
rjm.27.9a
|
rjm.27.9a
|
rju
|
rju
|
rju
|
ICCAT-BON
|
ICCAT-BON
|
ICCAT-BON
|
pil.27.8c9a
|
pil.27.8c9a
|
pil.27.8c9a
|
vma
|
vma
|
vma
|
mac.27.nea
|
mac.27.nea
|
mac.27.nea
|
syc.27.8c9a
|
syc.27.8c9a
|
syc.27.8c9a
|
ctc
|
ctc
|
ctc
|
oal
|
oal
|
oal
|
sol.27.8c9a
|
sol.27.8c9a
|
sol.27.8c9a
|
sbg
|
sbg
|
sbg
|
ulo
|
ulo
|
ulo
|
ICCAT-ALB-N
|
ICCAT-ALB-N
|
ICCAT-ALB-N
|
ICCAT-YFT
|
ICCAT-YFT
|
ICCAT-YFT
|
ICCAT-BET
|
ICCAT-BET
|
ICCAT-BET
|
ICCAT-BFT
|
ICCAT-BFT
|
ICCAT-BFT
|
jaa
|
jaa
|
jaa
|
hom.27.9a
|
hom.27.9a
|
hom.27.9a
|
bib
|
bib
|
bib
|
ICCAT-SWO-N
|
ICCAT-SWO-N
|
ICCAT-SWO-N
|
jod
|
jod
|
jod
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
CFP |
CFP |
CFP |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
||||
Parameter other |
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
F/Fmsy
|
Spawning stock (SSF/SSFMSY)
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Biomass index
|
Index ratio (A/B)
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
catch/biomass ratio?
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
F/Fmsy
|
Spawning stock (SSF/SSFMSY)
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
F/Fmsy
|
B/Bmsy
|
Catch/biomass ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.41 |
4600.0 |
0.32 |
980.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.43 |
5400.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.75 |
11100.0 |
0.53 |
2250000.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.19 |
446331.0 |
0.48 |
2570000.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.103 |
0.11 |
181000.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
2.85 |
0.7 |
4.38 |
0.95 |
0.72 |
0.322 |
0.22 |
8125.0 |
0.21 |
1708.0 |
0.45 |
1.204 |
0.21 |
8550.0 |
1.63 |
0.67 |
0.64 |
24643.0 |
0.4 |
5906696.0 |
1.08 |
0.75 |
3.45 |
0.204 |
136611.0 |
0.405 |
3443926.0 |
0.54 |
1.36 |
0.77 |
0.95 |
1.28 |
0.95 |
0.339 |
0.077 |
490476.0 |
0.78 |
1.04 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.33 |
0.22 |
1.93 |
0.57 |
0.4 |
1.35 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
tonne
|
tonne
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
tonne
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
tonne
|
tonne
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
tonne
|
tonne
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
tonne
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||
Description parameter |
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
The assessment was based on the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. The assessment was based on the comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
For Parameter achieved: No, if Value Achieved > 1
|
For Parameter achieved: No, when Value Achieved < 1
|
For Parameter achieved: No, if Value Achieved > 1
|
For Parameter achieved: No, when Value Achieved < 1
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <
|
For Parameter achieved: No, when Value Achieved < 1
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >
|
For Parameter achieved: No, if Value Achieved > 1
|
For Parameter achieved: No, when Value Achieved < 1
|
Parameter achieved: YES, when Value Achieved > 1
Index A (2015-2016)= 6 kg/h
Index B (2012-2014)= 5.6 kg/h |
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <
|
For Parameter achieved: No, when Value Achieved < 1
|
For Parameter achieved: No, if Value Achieved > 1
|
For Parameter achieved: No, when Value Achieved < 1
|
Based on the value of F0,1
Parameter achieved when value achieved > F0,1 |
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved <
|
For Parameter achieved: Yes, when Value Achieved >
|
The exploitation rate given by the ?catch/biomass? ratio has been considered. Biomass indexes were obtained from research survey data or from a series of CPUE (catch per unit of effort) standardised.
And made the comparison of the recent average with the average and the historical standard deviation by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the biomass index (proxy of the spawning biomass index) was taken into account, which was obtained by means of a standardised research campaign or CPUE series (catch per unit of effort) standardised. Comparison of the recent average with the average and the standard deviation to long term by applying the equation:
m
|
In this case, the 95th percentile of the distribution by length (L95) was considered.
The 95th percentile of length distribution is an indicator of the presence of individuals of large size in the population (ICES, 2015) and aims to reflect the status of a population as the increase in fishing pressure on one species may result in a decrease in the proportion of large size individuals in the population by reducing the L95 (ICES, 2016a). For determination of the L95, the length distribution frequencies for each species collected in research campaigns have been used for each year and the following equation is applied:
GDP95
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
ICES, 2017b). The ICES recommendation has therefore not been to assess this criterion until biological reference points related to the ?healthy population? (ICES, 2016) are developed.
Bibliography:
ICES. 2016. EU request to provide guidance on the practical methodology for delivering an MSFD assessment on D3 for an MSFD region/subregion (13 May 21016). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 1, Section 1.6.2.1.
ICES. 2017a. Report of the Workshop on Guidance on Development of Operational Methods for the Evaluation of the MSFD Established D3.3 (WKIND3.3ii), 1-4 November 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM: 44.145 p.
ICES. 2017b. EU request to provide guidance on operational methods for the evaluation of the MSFD Criteria teriion D3C3 (second step 2017). In Report of the ICES Special Request Advice, 2017. ICES Advice 2017, sr.2017.07.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
In the information available.
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
Inventory with ICCAT assessment
|
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
There is information available, but is insufficient. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
The rule of integration of parameters has been defined in the ICES and ICCAT stock assessment working groups, according to the species/stock and the corresponding assessment model.
|
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES classification was based on the integration of the assessment according to the values set for criteria D3C1 and D3C2. The method of integration used for the assessment of GES was ?One All Outside? (OOAO). The overall assessment for each stock was classified in: GES achieved, when both criteria (D3C1 and D3C2) were within the defined range for reference values
|
GES extent threshold |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
GES extent achieved |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
53.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
thunnus thynnus Trachurus trachurus
|
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|