Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Portugal / NE Atlantic: Macaronesia
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Portugal |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Macaronesia |
Reported by | DGRM |
Report date | 2021-03-03 |
Report access | ART8_GES_PT_setembro2020.xml |
Azores Subdivision (AMA-PT-SD-AZO)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
All trophic guilds |
Fish community |
All consumers |
All consumers |
All trophic guilds |
Apex predators |
Apex predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Fish community |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsAll |
FishCommunity |
ConsumersAll |
ConsumersAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
FishCommunity |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||
Element source |
National |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
GFCM |
GFCM |
National |
National |
ICES |
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Biomass
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
Biomass
|
Catches
|
Catches
|
Biomass
|
Catches
|
Biomass
|
Catches
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
The configuration of the marine trophic spectrum of the Azores is maintained
|
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
||||||||
Value unit other |
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The marine trophic spectrum of the Azores presents a typical system configuration in which an important component of deep ocean systems predominates, which depend less on direct primary production compared with coastal ecosystems at lesser depths. This was indicated initially by Morato et al. (2016), based on the results obtained for the reference point (1997), that the eco-efficiency (EE) of phytoplankton and algae were only 0.11 and 0.013 respectively. This feature is highlighted by looking at the trophic spectrum obtained by a multi-modal configuration in the distribution of trophic levels, with continuity between primary producers and first consumers and the remaining levels (~ 3.0 and ~ 4.0) (Figure D4.5). This characteristic has been maintained in the marine ecosystem of the Azores over the last two decades, despite major changes in fishing exploitation patterns, due both to major technological changes and regulatory changes, which have been shaping the behaviour of fisheries in the Azores and the consequent biomass extraction pattern from the system.
|
The reference limit for the proportion of large fish used in this criterion is not established for Portuguese waters. In this assessment it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series is shown to be good environmental status.
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
The reference limit for the use of the relevant criterion is not established for the waters of the subdivision of the Azores. In this assessment it is accepted that the statistical trend of the historical series available is shown to be good environmental status.
|
Related indicator |
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The corresponding contours of the trophic spectra obtained for the two periods under analysis (1997/2013) were also estimated on the basis of ?Biomass Ecosim model?. The results have been visually compared and by the calculation of the Pearson?s correlation coefficient between the estimated biomass values for each trophic level for the two periods (1997/2013) in order to verify whether changes in the matching of the structures in the components of the marine ecosystem of the Azores have changed over the reporting period.
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
The reference limit for the use of the relevant criterion is not established for the waters of the subdivision of the Azores. In this assessment it is accepted that the statistical trend of the historical series available is shown to be good environmental status.
|
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
The corresponding contours of the trophic spectra obtained for the two periods under analysis (1997/2013) were also estimated on the basis of ?Biomass Ecosim model?. The results have been visually compared and by the calculation of the Pearson?s correlation coefficient between the estimated biomass values for each trophic level for the two periods (1997/2013) in order to verify whether changes in the matching of the structures in the components of the marine ecosystem of the Azores have changed over the reporting period.
|
The proportion of large fish (LFI ? Large Fish Indicator) can be defined as the size that can provide an indicator of the structure of the trophic webs, and was used in the assessment of primary D4C1 and secondary D4C3. For the fishing community, indicators based on the size of the individual are considered to be suitable for monitoring the trophic structure of the trophic web, which therefore reflects the state of a particular fish community suffering from different levels of fishing intensity. The LIF has been calculated over the period 1995-2018 by dividing the biomass of all species above the length of 30 cm (B ? 30) to the total biomass (Btotal).
For this analysis, the information available in the ARDAN for a total of 23 species has been taken into account, taking into account the fact that these species took place in at least half of the years sampled in the table (Pinho et al. in prep.). In order to increase the sensitivity of this indicator to anthropogenic pressure and to reduce the variability associated with the selectivity of art, recruitment and migration, species such as small pelagic and elasmobranchs have been excluded from the analyses.
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
The corresponding contours of the trophic spectra obtained for the two periods under analysis (1997/2013) were also estimated on the basis of ?Biomass Ecosim model?. The results have been visually compared and by the calculation of the Pearson?s correlation coefficient between the estimated biomass values for each trophic level for the two periods (1997/2013) in order to verify whether changes in the matching of the structures in the components of the marine ecosystem of the Azores have changed over the reporting period.
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
To achieve the environmental assessment of criterion D4C2, the marine trophic level (MTL) methodology has been used. Through this methodology it is possible to detect changes in the relationships between the different components of the trophic web, from the top-trophic predators of the food chain with a high trophic level, even to the low trophic invertebrate invertebrates. In this way, the MTL is calculated annually.
Biomass biomass and species with trophic trophic level TL ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL grouping threshold has been considered to represent all consumer species.
The criterion used to estimate the species for estimating MTL was the same as for the assessment of Descriptor 3, where species representing 90 % of the cumulative percentage of landings from commercial fisheries were considered. A time series starting in 1997 has been used (considered as a reference point for the evaluation of this descriptor in this scope) for the analysis of the variation of the trophic level until 2018, which corresponds to the end of the second implementation period of the Directive.
To verify the trends presented in the results described in D4C1 and D4C2, be it increasing, decreasing or stable, the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was applied, where H0: The remarks of the indicator are independent and similarly distributed and in case H1: The indicator?s comments have a monotonic over time trend. The significance level for the test was 5 % (p-value
|
The proportion of large fish (LFI ? Large Fish Indicator) can be defined as the size that can provide an indicator of the structure of the trophic webs, and was used in the assessment of primary D4C1 and secondary D4C3. For the fishing community, indicators based on the size of the individual are considered to be suitable for monitoring the trophic structure of the trophic web, which therefore reflects the state of a particular fish community suffering from different levels of fishing intensity. The LIF has been calculated over the period 1995-2018 by dividing the biomass of all species above the length of 30 cm (B ? 30) to the total biomass (Btotal).
For this analysis, the information available in the ARDAN for a total of 23 species has been taken into account, taking into account the fact that these species took place in at least half of the years sampled in the table (Pinho et al. in prep.). In order to increase the sensitivity of this indicator to anthropogenic pressure and to reduce the variability associated with the selectivity of art, recruitment and migration, species such as small pelagic and elasmobranchs have been excluded from the analyses.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
In addition to the difficulties of lack of methodological clarity in the competent authorities that come every six years to report environmental status on the basis of this descriptor, the scientific community has also sought, in the Azores, to assist the administration in this task by seeking appropriate tools to meet the requirements of the implementation of the MSFD. It is therefore that the IMAR-Uç team, led by the researcher Telmo Morato, published in 2016 the description of the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores (Morato et al. 2016), with the explicit purpose of supporting the implementation of the MSFD assessment of D4, thereby seeking to provide tools for the authorities to enable the development of an ecosystem based marine environment management, as the Directive provides, but which will be difficult to implement for a variety of reasons (techniques, information gaps, lack of articulation between the different Union environmental management instruments and their linkage with sectors that manage the exploitation of living marine resources such as the Common Fisheries Policy).
The team led by the researcher, Mr Rui Pinho, on the other hand, has tried to assess, on the basis of information directly from the experimental fisheries scientific surveys and the fishing statistics reflecting the official catches, the impacts of fishing pressure on the structure of the marine ecosystem in the Azores, through the analysis of the variation of the sizes which make up the populations of commercially exploited species, or through the temporal variation in the mean trophic level of the catches (Santos et al. 2019, Pinho et al. in prep.).
While reporting on this descriptor falls under the sole responsibility of the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs, as the environmental authority for the marine environment of the Autonomous Region of the Azores, it benefits from the results that have been obtained from these two research teams, which have been developing work in this area.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
||||||||||
Related targets |