Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D5 / Romania / Black Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
| Member State | Romania |
| Region/subregion | Black Sea |
| Reported by | Ministerul Apelor si Padurilor |
| Report date | 2020-04-06 |
| Report access | 4.ART8_GES_18_12_3_05.xml |
BLK_RO_RG_Coastal waters (BLK_RO_RG_CT)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIN |
DIN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Photic limit |
Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
TDIN |
TDIN |
TDIN |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
109921 |
109921 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
QE1-2-1 |
QE1-3 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
Warm season
|
|||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C6
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Other
|
Transparency in water
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Ammonium concentration in water
|
Nitrate concentration in water
|
Nitrite concentration in water
|
Biomass cold season
|
Biomass warm season
|
%
|
M-AMBI*(n)
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
7.14 |
107.14 |
2.14 |
3.31 |
5.97 |
100.0 |
350.0 |
2.0 |
40.0 |
0.68 |
Threshold value lower |
7.14 |
107.14 |
2.14 |
3.31 |
5.97 |
100.0 |
350.0 |
2.0 |
40.0 |
0.68 |
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
|||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
158.78 |
29.21 |
24.33 |
15.45 |
15.7 |
2308.0 |
4842.0 |
12.0 |
100.0 |
1.0 |
Value achieved lower |
0.12 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.17 |
0.28 |
0.5 |
5.33 |
0.4 |
||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
dmnl
|
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
75.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
90.0 |
50.0 |
75.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
45.0 |
100.0 |
93.0 |
96.0 |
77.0 |
85.0 |
53.0 |
86.0 |
33.0 |
85.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Ammonium
|
Nitrate
|
Nitrite
|
|||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Description element |
Ammonium
|
Ammonium
|
Ammonium
|
Parameter assessed for warm season
|
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%-TP, 25%-NO2, 25%-NO3, 25%_NH4) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
GES extent threshold |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
GES extent achieved |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BLK_RO_RG_Marine shelf waters (BLK_RO_RG_MT01)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Chlorophyll-a |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
109921 |
109921 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
QE1-3 |
QE1-3 |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
Warm season
|
Bottom oxygen in warm season
|
||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
D5C8
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Transparency in water
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Concentration in water Northern part
|
Concentration in water Southern part
|
Biomass cold season
|
Biomass warm season
|
Saturation
|
M-AMBI (n)
|
M-AMBI(n)
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
10.5 |
0.23 |
4.11 |
2.79 |
60.0 |
240.0 |
6.8 |
60.0 |
0.61 |
0.68 |
Threshold value lower |
10.5 |
0.23 |
4.11 |
2.79 |
60.0 |
240.0 |
6.8 |
60.0 |
0.61 |
0.68 |
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
|
||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
65.54 |
2.33 |
21.23 |
6.42 |
1081.0 |
3490.0 |
14.0 |
189.3 |
1.0 |
0.99 |
Value achieved lower |
1.62 |
0.01 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
45.7 |
0.71 |
0.23 |
||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
dmnl
|
dmnl
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
58.0 |
63.0 |
62.0 |
74.6 |
67.0 |
53.0 |
20.0 |
98.0 |
100.0 |
43.6 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Description parameter |
Parameter assessed for Northern area
|
Parameter assessed for Southern area
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
|||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
||||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (50% DIP and 50%DIN) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against GES. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (DIP and DIN) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
GES extent threshold |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
GES extent achieved |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
38.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BLK_RO_RG_Waters with variable salinity (BLK_RO_RG_TT03)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Nutrients (integrated) |
Nutrients (integrated) |
Nutrients (integrated) |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Noctiluca scintillans |
Photic limit |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Element code |
FI_Nutrients |
FI_Nutrients |
FI_Nutrients |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
109921 |
109921 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
QE1-3 |
Element code source |
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Undefined
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
Warm season
|
||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
National |
EU |
EU |
National |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C3
|
D5C3
|
D5C4
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Other
|
Transparency in water
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Ammonium concentration in water
|
Nitrate concentration in water
|
Nitrite concentration in water
|
Biomass cold season
|
Biomass warm season
|
M-AMBI*(n)
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
7.14 |
107.14 |
2.14 |
3.23 |
11.88 |
70.0 |
240.0 |
2.0 |
0.61 |
Threshold value lower |
7.14 |
107.14 |
2.14 |
3.23 |
11.88 |
70.0 |
240.0 |
2.0 |
0.61 |
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||
Value achieved upper |
34.82 |
53.93 |
50.35 |
5.76 |
56.92 |
135.0 |
13357.0 |
10.5 |
1.0 |
Value achieved lower |
0.86 |
0.1 |
0.03 |
0.29 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.53 |
||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
dmnl
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
75.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
90.0 |
75.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
36.0 |
100.0 |
94.0 |
93.0 |
35.0 |
98.0 |
70.0 |
40.0 |
89.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Ammonium
|
Nitrite
|
Parameter assessed for warm season
|
warm season
|
|||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
|||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Description element |
|||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
BEAST integrates parameters based on their weight. In this case, we considered causes (25%TP, 25%NO3, 25%NO2, 25% NH4)) and effects (50%Chlorophyll and 50% transparency) against national legislation (Ord.161/2006). |
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
BEAST - Black Sea Eutrophication Assessment Tool. A tool similar to HEAT (HELCOM) developed for the Black Sea into Baltic2Black Project. Due to the different area, parameters, and features, BEAST was calculated taking into consideration causes - nutrients (TP, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia) and effects (chlorophyll a and transparency) calculated for each station. Between parameters and criteria, BEAST uses OneOutAllOut principle and EQR and gives a qualitative score - High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad. The threshold between Good and Moderate is considered as GES. |
GES extent threshold |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|