Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-M / Sweden / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Member State | Sweden |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Havs- och vattenmyndigheten |
Report date | 2020-07-06 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8GES_SE_200706.xml |
ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt
GES component |
D1-M
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Seals
|
|||||
Element |
Phoca vitulina |
|||||
Element code |
137084 |
|||||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|||||
Element 2 |
||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
|||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
||
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
||
Parameter other |
Trend in abundance
|
|||||
Threshold value upper |
10000.0 |
-10.0 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Not decreasing
|
All storically used sites for breeding and resting are colonized |
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
14000.0 |
6.0 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
(number of) individuals
|
percentage
|
||||
Value unit other |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Unknown |
||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Description parameter |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D4C1. |
|||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
||
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1 and we do not have any indicators yet. |
We do not have indicators under this criterion yet. The assessment is dependent on the relevant assessment under habitats directive but thresholds must be modified in order to fit the scope of MSFD, this could not be done so far due to lack of knowledge about the condition of relevant habitats. |
||||
Element status |
Good |
|||||
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description criteria |
GES defined as: When the threshold values for all indicators of each species under relevant criteria are achieved in the assessment area. |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
|||||
Description overall status |
||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||
Related targets |
|
ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund
GES component |
D1-M
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Seals
|
||||||||||||
Element |
Halichoerus grypus |
Phoca vitulina |
|||||||||||
Element code |
137080 |
137084 |
|||||||||||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|||||||||||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
|||||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
|||||
Parameter |
Fecundity rate
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
|||||
Parameter other |
Blubber thickness (caught seals)
|
Blubber thickness (hunted seals)
|
Trend in abundance
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
90.0 |
35.0 |
40.0 |
10000.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Not decreasing
|
All available sites for breeding and resting are colonized |
Not decreasing
|
All historically used sites for breeding and resting are colonized |
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
82.0 |
29.1 |
37.28 |
10000.0 |
5.9 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
millimetre
|
(number of) individuals
|
percentage
|
|||||||||
Value unit other |
Percent
|
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||||
Description parameter |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (including Öresund), including the Bothnian Sea and the Bothnian Bay.
Contributes to D4C4 |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (including Öresund), including the Bothnian Sea and the Bothnian Bay.
Trend for Blubber thickness: assessed for both parameters together
Contributes to D4C4 |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (including Öresund), including the Bothnian Sea and the Bothnian Bay.
Trend for Blubber thickness: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D4C4 |
Same population as in the Arkonahavet and the southern Öresund (BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund), part of metapopulation composed of subpopulations in the southern Baltic (excluding Kalmarsund), Limfjorden and Kattegatt, growth is assessed separately for each sub-population.
Contributes to D4C1 |
Same population as in the Arkonahavet and the southern Öresund (BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund), part of metapopulation composed of subpopulations in the southern Baltic (excluding Kalmarsund), Limfjorden and Kattegatt. |
||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
|||||
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1 and we do not have any indicators yet.
A justification for not using criteria D1C1 for seals is unfortunately not included in ART9GES-Schema. |
A justification for not using criteria D1C5 is included in ART9GES-Schema. We do not have indicators under this criterion yet. The assessment is dependent on the relevant assessment under habitats directive but thresholds need to be modified in order to fit the scope of MSFD. This have not been done so far due to lack of knowledge about the condition of relevant habitats. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1 and we do not have any indicators yet.
A justification for not using criteria D1C1 for seals is unfortunately not included in ART9GES-Schema. |
A justification for not using criteria D1C5 is included in ART9GES-Schema. We do not have indicators under this criterion yet. The assessment is dependent on the relevant assessment under habitats directive but thresholds need to be modified in order to fit the scope of MSFD. This have not been done so far due to lack of knowledge about the condition of relevant habitats. |
|||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
|||||||||||
Description element |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
GES defined as: When the threshold values for all indicators of each species under all relevant criteria are achieved in the assessment area. |
||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved by 2020 |
||||||||||||
Description overall status |
Good status for Halichoerus grypus is expected to be achieved by 2020, but later than 2020 for Phoca vitulina |
||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
||||||||||||
Related pressures |
|
||||||||||||
Related targets |
|
ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak
GES component |
D1-M
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Seals
|
|||||
Element |
Phoca vitulina |
|||||
Element code |
137084 |
|||||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|||||
Element 2 |
||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
|||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
||
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (range)
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
||
Parameter other |
Trend in abundance
|
|||||
Threshold value upper |
10000.0 |
-10.0 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Not decreasing
|
All historically used sites for breeding and resting are colonized |
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
11000.0 |
6.0 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
(number of) individuals
|
percentage
|
||||
Value unit other |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Improving |
Unknown |
||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Description parameter |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together
Contributes to D4C1 |
|||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
||
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1 and we do not have any indicators yet.
A justification for not using criteria D1C1 for seals is unfortunately not included in ART9GES-Schema. |
A justification for not using criteria D1C5 is included in ART9GES-Schema. We do not have indicators under this criterion yet. The assessment is dependent on the relevant assessment under habitats directive but thresholds need to be modified in order to fit the scope of MSFD. This have not been done so far due to lack of knowledge about the condition of relevant habitats. |
||||
Element status |
Good |
|||||
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description criteria |
GES defined as: When the threshold values for all indicators of each species under relevant criteria are achieved in the assessment area. |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
|||||
Description overall status |
||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||
Related targets |
|
ANS-SE-SR-Nordsjon
GES component |
D1-M
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Small toothed cetaceans
|
|||
Element |
Phocoena phocoena |
|||
Element code |
137117 |
|||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
|||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
||||
Parameter other |
||||
Threshold value upper |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
||||
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
||||
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend |
||||
Parameter achieved |
||||
Description parameter |
||||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
We do not have indicators under this criterion yet, because of lack of enough data and knowledge to establish threshold values. We are active in groups discussing this in OSPAR and HELCOM. |
We do not have indicators under this criterion yet, because of lack of enough data and knowledge to establish threshold values. We are active in groups discussing this in OSPAR and HELCOM. |
A justification for not using criteria D1C5 is included in ART9GES-Schema. We do not have indicators under this criterion yet. The assessment is dependent on the relevant assessment under habitats directive but thresholds must be modified in order to fit the scope of MSFD, this could not be done so far due to lack of knowledge about the condition of relevant habitats. |
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
|||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
||||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
|||
Description overall status |
We do not have indicators under any of the relevant criteria for harbour porpoise yet and not any definition of GES either. We only have a qualitative description for the three different populations (North Sea, Belt Sea and Baltic proper) in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. In the North Sea both the abundance and the distribution pattern seem to be stable. |
|||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||
Related pressures |
|
|||
Related targets |
|