Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-F / Sweden / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Report date | 2025-10-30 08:59:20 |
ANS-SE-AA-K_1n_Vastkusten_inre_Skagerrak
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
Abundance
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
39.3 |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
|||||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
3.3 |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
||||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
|||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_1s_Vastkusten_inre_Kattegatt
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
Abundance
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
39.3 |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
|||||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
3.3 |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
||||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
|||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_2_Vastkusten_fjordar
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
Abundance
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
39.3 |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
|||||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
3.3 |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
||||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
|||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_3_Vastkusten_yttre_Skagerrak
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
Abundance
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
39.3 |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
|||||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
3.3 |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
||||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
|||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_4_Vastkusten_yttre_Kattegatt
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
Abundance
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
39.3 |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
|||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
|||||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
3.3 |
|||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
||||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
|||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_5_S_Halland_och_N_Oresund
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Element extent |
|||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
||||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
|||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_6_Oresund
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Alosa spp. |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Element extent |
|||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
||||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
|||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_25_Gota_alv_Nordre_alv
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
ANS-SE-SR-Nordsjon
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Anarhichas lupus |
Anarhichas lupus |
Anarhichas lupus |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Helicolenus dactylopterus |
Hippoglossus hippoglossus |
Hippoglossus hippoglossus |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Lophius piscatorius |
Lophius piscatorius |
Lophius piscatorius |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Microstomus kitt |
Microstomus kitt |
Microstomus kitt |
Molva molva |
Molva molva |
Molva molva |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Pandalus borealis |
Pandalus borealis |
Pandalus borealis |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pollachius virens |
Pollachius virens |
Pollachius virens |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Sebastes viviparus |
Sebastes viviparus |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trisopterus esmarkii |
Trisopterus esmarkii |
Trisopterus esmarkii |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, Division 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, Division 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, Division 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4, Division 6.a, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, Skagerrak) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7 and divisions 3.a, 8.a–b and 8.d Northern stock (Greater North Sea Celtic Seas and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7 and divisions 3.a, 8.a–b and 8.d Northern stock (Greater North Sea Celtic Seas and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7 and divisions 3.a, 8.a–b and 8.d Northern stock (Greater North Sea Celtic Seas and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9 12 and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9 12 and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9 12 and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 3,4, 6–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 3,4, 6–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 3,4, 6–9, 12, and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 3.a, Functional units 3 and 4 (Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in divisions 3.a and 4.a East (Skagerrak and Kattegat and northern North Sea in the Norwegian Deep) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in divisions 3.a and 4.a East (Skagerrak and Kattegat and northern North Sea in the Norwegian Deep) |
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) in divisions 3.a and 4.a East (Skagerrak and Kattegat and northern North Sea in the Norwegian Deep) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21 and 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21 and 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21 and 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4, 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a and Subarea 4 (Skagerrak, Kattegat and North Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a and Subarea 4 (Skagerrak, Kattegat and North Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Division 3.a and Subarea 4 (Skagerrak, Kattegat and North Sea) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a 4.a 5.b 6.a 7.a–c e–k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a 4.a 5.b 6.a 7.a–c e–k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a 4.a 5.b 6.a 7.a–c e–k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
BIOM-SSB
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
BIOM-SSB
|
ABU Trend
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
ABU Trend
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
ABU Trend
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
upward trend
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.44 |
0.69 |
0.42 |
2.1 |
0.63 |
0.16 |
1.0 |
0.58 |
3.26 |
0.93 |
2.32 |
0.13 |
2.31 |
0.85 |
0.76 |
2.35 |
0.18 |
1.23 |
0.27 |
1.37 |
0.31 |
1.01 |
0.59 |
0.48 |
0.33 |
1.77 |
1.03 |
1.64 |
0.56 |
0.37 |
1.91 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description parameter |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
Assessment of this parameter is done for the period 2015-2020 |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/SSBPA > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/SSBPA > 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7, and divisions 3.a, 8.a-b and 8.d, Northern stock (Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7, and divisions 3.a, 8.a-b and 8.d, Northern stock (Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4, 6 and 7, and divisions 3.a, 8.a-b and 8.d, Northern stock (Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
55.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_7_Skane
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
Positive trend
|
||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|
||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_8_Blekinge_skarg_Kalmars_inre
Regional assessment area |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
||
Threshold value upper |
0.6 |
12.2 |
25.0 |
||
Threshold value lower |
|||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
>= |
||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||
Value achieved upper |
0.05 |
20.2 |
24.5 |
||
Value achieved lower |
|||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
No |
||
Description parameter |
|||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
|||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
No |
NA |
Yes |
No |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-K_9_Blekinge_skarg_Kalmars_yttr
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_10_Oland_och_Gotland
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_11_Gotland_nordvastra
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_12n_Osterg_Stockh_skargard
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Element extent |
||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Abundance
|
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.53 |
0.16 |
17.9 |
25.0 |
8.78 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.42 |
8.0 |
21.0 |
2.19 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|||||||
Description parameter |
||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_12s_Ostergotland_skargard
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
|||||||||
Threshold value upper |
4.7 |
1.29 |
68.3 |
23.0 |
19.5 |
0.47 |
|||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
|||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.5 |
57.6 |
23.0 |
3.8 |
1.58 |
||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|||||||||
Description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
|||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
No |
Yes |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_13_Ostergotland_inre
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_14_Ostergotland_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_15_Stockholm_skargard_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_16_S_Bottenhavet_inre
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Element extent |
||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Abundance
|
||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.43 |
7.22 |
25.0 |
5.51 |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.22 |
10.3 |
23.5 |
2.93 |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||
Description parameter |
||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
|||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_17_S_Bottenhavet_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_18_N_Bottenh_H_kusten_inre
Regional assessment area |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
1.42 |
6.89 |
25.0 |
||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
>= |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
0.94 |
7.69 |
26.0 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
|||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
|||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-K_19_N_Bottenh_H_kusten_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
|||
Parameter achieved |
|||
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_20_N_Kvarken_inre
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Element extent |
|||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
HD |
HD |
HD |
HD |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Abundance
|
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
1.86 |
19.2 |
25.0 |
1.0 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
HD
|
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
2.7 |
5.5 |
23.2 |
0.75 |
|||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
index - relative abundance
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
|||||||
Description parameter |
Observed value proxy to numerize qualitatively assessment within article 17 reporting, 2019 |
||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_21_N_Kvarken_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Element extent |
|||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
HD |
HD |
HD |
HD |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Abundance
|
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
1.03 |
19.2 |
25.0 |
1.0 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
HD
|
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
1.9 |
14.4 |
26.5 |
0.75 |
|||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
index - relative abundance
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|||||||
Description parameter |
Observed value proxy to numerize qualitatively assessment within article 17 reporting, 2019 |
||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
33.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_22_Bottenviken_inre
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
HD |
HD |
HD |
HD |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Abundance
|
Size distribution
|
Abundance
|
||||||||
Threshold value upper |
2.02 |
0.042 |
7.23 |
25.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
HD
|
||||||||
Value achieved upper |
4.02 |
0.086 |
10.25 |
23.0 |
0.75 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||
Value unit |
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
centimetre
|
index - relative abundance
|
||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||||||
Description parameter |
Observed value proxy to numerize qualitatively assessment within article 17 reporting, 2019 |
||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_23_Bottenviken_yttre
Regional assessment area |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Thymallus thymallus |
Element extent |
||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||
Element source |
HD |
HD |
HD |
HD |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Abundance
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
|||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
HD
|
|||
Value achieved upper |
0.75 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
index - relative abundance
|
|||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
|||
Parameter achieved |
No |
|||
Description parameter |
Observed value proxy to numerize qualitatively assessment within article 17 reporting, 2019 |
|||
Related indicator |
|
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_24_Stockh_inre_skarg_Hallsfj
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Element |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
ABU Trend
|
Size distribution
|
ABU Trend
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
25.0 |
|||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
Positive trend
|
Positive trend
|
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||
Value achieved upper |
28.25 |
|||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
centimetre
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||
Description parameter |
||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
Description overall status |
||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-RG-Ostersjon
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
D1F |
Feature |
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Solea solea |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Coregonus albula |
Coregonus albula |
Coregonus albula |
Coregonus albula |
Coregonus albula |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo trutta |
Salmo trutta |
Salmo trutta |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Element 2 |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22-24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22-24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22-24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Dab (Limanda limanda) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 and 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 and 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 and 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21 and 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21 and 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21 and 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 24-32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 24-32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 24-32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Salmon (Salmo salar) in subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Gulf of Finland) |
Salmon (Salmo salar) in subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Gulf of Finland) |
Salmon (Salmo salar) in subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Gulf of Finland) |
Sea trout (Salmo trutta) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sea trout (Salmo trutta) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Sea trout (Salmo trutta) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
|||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
Parameter |
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Age distribution
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
> |
>= |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
> |
> |
>= |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.47 |
0.02 |
2.35 |
0.18 |
3.39 |
1.01 |
0.59 |
0.48 |
0.33 |
1.25 |
0.75 |
1.69 |
0.15 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Description parameter |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/SSBPA > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
Observed values extracted from relevant Helcom assessment, qualitative assessment. Value achieved (observed value) as a proxy.
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
Observed values extracted from relevant Helcom assessment, qualitative assessment. Value achieved (observed value) as a proxy. |
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
SSB/BMSY Trigger > 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C4, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C5, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
Data are insufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C1, we do not have any indicators yet. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for demersal fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
The assessment of GES for pelagic fish for D1 is only based on D1C2. D1C3 is not included in the integrated assessment of GES since the confidence of the indicator was judged lower than for indicators used under criterium D1C2. Therefore, D1C3 is not given the same weight in the integration. The indicator used under D1C3 has been used as an indication that the population is at risk of not representing a healthy population. |
GES extent threshold |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
GES extent achieved |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
37.50 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
Description overall status |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |