Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-P / Sweden / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Report date | 2025-10-30 08:59:20 |
ANS-SE-AA-K_1n_Vastkusten_inre_Skagerrak
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.45 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
Value achieved upper |
0.53 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Good |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
ANS-SE-AA-K_1s_Vastkusten_inre_Kattegatt
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_2_Vastkusten_fjordar
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_3_Vastkusten_yttre_Skagerrak
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_4_Vastkusten_yttre_Kattegatt
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.64 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
Value achieved upper |
0.33 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
ANS-SE-AA-K_5_S_Halland_och_N_Oresund
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_6_Oresund
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-K_25_Gota_alv_Nordre_alv
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
ANS-SE-AA-U_Kattegatt
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.52 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
Value achieved upper |
0.42 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
ANS-SE-AA-U_Skagerrak
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.59 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
Value achieved upper |
0.49 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Description element |
The SourceElementList for Swedish assessment units in the North Sea is reported as 'national'; the Helcom methodology has been applied also to these assessment units to promote a coherent national assessment (and regional coordination). |
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-K_7_Skane
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_8_Blekinge_skarg_Kalmars_inre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_9_Blekinge_skarg_Kalmars_yttr
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_10_Oland_och_Gotland
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_11_Gotland_nordvastra
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_12n_Osterg_Stockh_skargard
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_12s_Ostergotland_skargard
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_13_Ostergotland_inre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_14_Ostergotland_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.71 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.64 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-K_15_Stockholm_skargard_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_16_S_Bottenhavet_inre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_17_S_Bottenhavet_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_18_N_Bottenh_H_kusten_inre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_19_N_Bottenh_H_kusten_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.82 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.69 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-K_20_N_Kvarken_inre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_21_N_Kvarken_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.55 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.71 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Good |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-K_22_Bottenviken_inre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-K_23_Bottenviken_yttre
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Threshold value upper |
0.54 |
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.34 |
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Not good |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-K_24_Stockh_inre_skarg_Hallsfj
Regional assessment area |
|
|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
GES component |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|
Trend element |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
Parameter |
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold value operator |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend parameter |
|
Parameter achieved |
|
Description parameter |
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|
Test TV |
NA |
Test results |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-U_Alands_hav
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Cyanobacterial bloom
|
BIOM total stock
|
Size - mean
|
Threshold value upper |
0.91 |
55.0 |
10.3 |
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.35 |
85.0 |
13.3 |
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
Ratio-EQR
|
mg/m3 ww
|
ug/individual ww
|
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Indicator assessment also included in D5 Eutrophication |
||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||
Element status |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-U_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Cyanobacterial bloom
|
|
Threshold value upper |
0.55 |
0.85 |
|
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
> |
>= |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Value achieved upper |
0.61 |
0.61 |
|
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Ratio-EQR
|
|
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
|
Description parameter |
Indicator assessment also included in D5 Eutrophication |
||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
|
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
Yes |
No |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-U_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten
Regional assessment area |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Cyanobacterial bloom
|
BIOM total stock
|
Size - mean
|
Threshold value upper |
0.66 |
0.83 |
273.0 |
14.9 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.54 |
0.61 |
428.0 |
12.9 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Ratio-EQR
|
mg/m3 ww
|
ug/individual ww
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Description parameter |
Indicator assessment also included in D5 Eutrophication |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten |
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet
Regional assessment area |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Cyanobacterial bloom
|
BIOM total stock
|
Size - mean
|
Threshold value upper |
0.63 |
0.92 |
84.0 |
8.5 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.45 |
0.36 |
176.0 |
38.9 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Ratio-EQR
|
mg/m3 ww
|
ug/individual ww
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Indicator assessment also included in D5 Eutrophication |
|||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
BIOM total stock
|
Size - mean
|
Threshold value upper |
0.61 |
161.0 |
23.7 |
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
> |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.65 |
110.0 |
67.8 |
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
mg/m3 ww
|
ug/individual ww
|
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken |
|
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-U_N_Gotlandshavet
Regional assessment area |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
|||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Cyanobacterial bloom
|
BIOM total stock
|
Size - mean
|
Threshold value upper |
0.93 |
123.0 |
9.8 |
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.43 |
244.0 |
6.3 |
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
Ratio-EQR
|
mg/m3 ww
|
ug/individual ww
|
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
No |
Description parameter |
Indicator assessment also included in D5 Eutrophication |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_N_Gotlandshavet |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_N_Gotlandshavet |
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
|||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
Yes |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-U_N_Kvarken
Regional assessment area |
||
|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
||
Threshold value upper |
||
Threshold value lower |
||
Threshold value operator |
||
Threshold qualitative |
||
Threshold value source |
||
Value achieved upper |
||
Value achieved lower |
||
Value unit |
||
Proportion threshold value |
||
Proportion value achieved |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||
Trend parameter |
||
Parameter achieved |
||
Description parameter |
||
Related indicator |
||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-AA-U_O_Gotlandshavet
Regional assessment area |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Cyanobacterial bloom
|
BIOM total stock
|
Size - mean
|
Threshold value upper |
0.68 |
0.89 |
104.0 |
14.1 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.64 |
0.44 |
230.0 |
9.4 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Ratio-EQR
|
mg/m3 ww
|
ug/individual ww
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Description parameter |
Indicator assessment also included in D5 Eutrophication |
Indicator 1.6A is achieved in 'BAL-SE-AA-U_O_Gotlandshavet |
Indicator 1.6A is achieved in 'BAL-SE-AA-U_O_Gotlandshavet |
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
BAL-SE-AA-U_V_Gotlandshavet
Regional assessment area |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||
GES component |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
D1P |
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Shelf pelagic habitat |
Element extent |
||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Phytoplankton communities
|
Phytoplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Zooplankton communities
|
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
BIOVOL
|
Cyanobacterial bloom
|
BIOM total stock
|
Size - mean
|
Threshold value upper |
0.7 |
0.85 |
220.0 |
5.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold value operator |
> |
>= |
> |
> |
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Value achieved upper |
0.56 |
0.41 |
220.0 |
4.9 |
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
mm3/l
|
Ratio-EQR
|
mg/m3 ww
|
ug/individual ww
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Description parameter |
Indicator assessment also included in D5 Eutrophication |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_V_Gotlandshavet |
Indicator 1.6A is not achieved in BAL-SE-AA-U_V_Gotlandshavet |
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
Asseessment of Phytoplankton communities is based on indicators 1.6B (biovolume of phytoplankton communities) and 5.3A (cyanobacterial blooming, under descriptor 5) |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
The integration of phytoplankton is based on two indicators describing the taxonomic composition of the phytoplankton. However, the cyanobacterial bloom indicator only describes a part of the community, which is why the indicator (5.3A) was given a lower weight. Integration rule for the eutrophication indicators under D5C2 and D5C4 (5.2A,B and 5.4A,B) for risk assessment, follows same method as for the assessment of D5. The definition is described in the ART.9GES-Schema. |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
Proportion of habitats in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
||||
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |