Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / Sweden / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | Sweden |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Havs- och vattenmyndigheten |
Report date | 2020-07-06 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8GES_SE_200706.xml |
ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Element |
Circalittoral coarse sediment |
Circalittoral mixed sediment |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Circalittoral sand |
Infralittoral coarse sediment |
Infralittoral mixed sediment |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef |
Infralittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment |
Offshore circalittoral mud |
Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Upper bathyal sediment |
Element code |
HabBenCircalitCoarSed |
HabBenCircalitMxdSed |
HabBenCircalitMud |
HabBenCircalitRock |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenInfralitCoarSed |
HabBenInfralitMxdSed |
HabBenInfralitMud |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitRock |
HabBenInfralitSand |
HabBenOffshCoarSed |
HabBenOffshMxdSed |
HabBenOffshMud |
HabBenOffshRock |
HabBenOffshSand |
HabBenOffshSand |
HabBenBathyalUpSed |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
EU |
EU |
EU |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
OSPAR |
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
Parameter |
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
|
Parameter other |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
disturbance category lower than 4
|
||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
||||||||||
Value unit other |
percent
|
percent
|
percent
|
percent
|
percent
|
percent
|
percent
|
percent
|
percent
|
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
87.0 |
95.0 |
89.0 |
86.0 |
86.0 |
33.0 |
44.0 |
30.0 |
1.0 |
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
|
Description parameter |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. 16 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values. |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. 16 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values. |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
An assessment could not be made for infralittoral rock and biogenic reef because of data lacking for 33% of the assessment area, and threshold values reached for 66% of the area. |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. In the open sea, 51,3 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. In the open sea, 51,3 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for indicator 6.3A, Extent of physical disturbance in benthic habitat types. |
|
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. 16 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values. |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. 16 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values. |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
Sweden do not have indicators under this criterion yet. The reason is lack of enough and adequate information and knowledge on the benthic habitats. Another reason is that threshold values shall be established at union level. We will include these thresholds when they are established. We are active in groups discussing this in CIS-MSFD, as well as in OSPAR and HELCOM. |
An assessment could not be made for infralittoral rock and biogenic reef because of data lacking for 33% of the assessment area, and threshold values reached for 66% of the area. |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. In the open sea, 51,3 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values |
Following the precautionary principle good status cannot be considered reached, based on the 2013 reporting of quality parameters under Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
Good status was not reached for circalittoral sand and mud. In the open sea, 51,3 % of the assessment area reaches threshold values |
|||||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Description element |
|||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
The Swedish assessment for benthic habitats in 2018 is incomplete, and is assessed for 9 elements for criterion D6C5 and 16 elements for D6C3. The assessment for D6C3 is not done quantitatively on parameter level due to lack of integration methods. For D5C6 coastal areas were assessed building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type regarding soft-bottom macrofauna and macrophytes. Habitats in the open sea were assessed based on indicators and assessments available within the regional sea conventions. In cases where no assessments were available, a risk assessment was made based on Article 17 of the Habitats directive (92/43/EEG). |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|