Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-P / Sweden / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
Member State | Sweden |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Havs- och vattenmyndigheten |
Report date | 2020-07-06 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8GES_SE_200706.xml |
BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
|
Parameter other |
Biomass of zooplankton
|
Mean size of zooplankton
|
||
Threshold value upper |
55.0 |
10.3 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
47.0 |
8.1 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
mg per m-3
|
microgram wet weight per ind.
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
|
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||
Element 2 code |
||
Element 2 code source |
||
Element source |
EU |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
|
Parameter other |
||
Threshold value upper |
||
Threshold value lower |
||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||
Value achieved upper |
||
Value achieved lower |
||
Value unit |
||
Value unit other |
||
Proportion threshold value |
||
Proportion value achieved |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
|
Related indicator |
||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
GES extent threshold |
||
GES extent achieved |
||
GES extent unit |
||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
|
Parameter other |
Biomass of zooplankton
|
Mean size of zooplankton
|
||
Threshold value upper |
381.0 |
13.3 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
223.0 |
12.2 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
mg per m-3
|
microgram wet weight per ind.
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||
Element 2 code |
||
Element 2 code source |
||
Element source |
EU |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
|
Parameter other |
||
Threshold value upper |
||
Threshold value lower |
||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||
Value achieved upper |
||
Value achieved lower |
||
Value unit |
||
Value unit other |
||
Proportion threshold value |
||
Proportion value achieved |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
|
Related indicator |
||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
|
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
GES extent threshold |
||
GES extent achieved |
||
GES extent unit |
||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
|
Parameter other |
Biomass of zooplankton
|
Mean size of zooplankton
|
||
Threshold value upper |
161.0 |
23.7 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
166.0 |
30.7 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
mg per m-3
|
microgram wet weight per ind.
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
|
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. Information provided on parameter level. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
Other
|
Other
|
|
Parameter other |
Biomass of zooplankton
|
Mean size of zooplankton
|
||
Threshold value upper |
55.0 |
10.3 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|||
Threshold value source |
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
47.0 |
8.1 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
mg per m-3
|
microgram wet weight per ind.
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
|
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. Information provided on parameter level. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||
Element 2 code |
||
Element 2 code source |
||
Element source |
EU |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
|
Parameter other |
||
Threshold value upper |
||
Threshold value lower |
||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||
Value achieved upper |
||
Value achieved lower |
||
Value unit |
||
Value unit other |
||
Proportion threshold value |
||
Proportion value achieved |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
|
Related indicator |
||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
|
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B).For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level. |
GES extent threshold |
||
GES extent achieved |
||
GES extent unit |
||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 51 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Gulf of Bothnia (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken).
For open sea areas, threshold values are reached for all indicators assessed in Bothnian Sea (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenhavet) och BothnianBay (BAL-SE-AA-U_Bottenviken) but not in BAL-SE-AA-U-Alands_Hav. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||
Element 2 code |
||
Element 2 code source |
||
Element source |
EU |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
|
Parameter other |
||
Threshold value upper |
||
Threshold value lower |
||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||
Value achieved upper |
||
Value achieved lower |
||
Value unit |
||
Value unit other |
||
Proportion threshold value |
||
Proportion value achieved |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
|
Related indicator |
||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
GES extent threshold |
||
GES extent achieved |
||
GES extent unit |
||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Coastal |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagCoastal |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||
Element 2 code |
||
Element 2 code source |
||
Element source |
EU |
National |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Habitat condition
|
|
Parameter other |
||
Threshold value upper |
||
Threshold value lower |
||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement of both abundance and biomass development of phytoplankton over time |
|
Threshold value source |
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||
Value achieved upper |
||
Value achieved lower |
||
Value unit |
||
Value unit other |
||
Proportion threshold value |
||
Proportion value achieved |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
No |
|
Description parameter |
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C1
|
|
Related indicator |
||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Coastal areas were assessed based on indicator 5.2A (chlorophyll and biovolume), building on the assessment done according to the Water Framework Directive but aggregated to coastal water type. Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level |
For the open sea, assessment was made based on regionally agreed indicators (indicators 1.6A, 5.3A, 5.3B) plus a national indicator species composition of phytoplankton (indicator 1.6B). No method is available for quantitative assessment of good environmental status at criteria level.For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins.
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
No integration with other indicators could be done because of lack of quantitative thresholds for some indicators |
GES extent threshold |
||
GES extent achieved |
||
GES extent unit |
||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. |
Good environmental status was reached for approximately 26 % of the coastal waters in the Swedish part of the Baltic Proper (BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon). For the open sea in the Baltic Proper threshold values for at least one of the indicators assessed were not reached in any of the five basins. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
BAL-SE-AA-U_V_Gotlandshavet
GES component |
D1-P
|
D1-P
|
---|---|---|
Feature |
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Element |
Shelf |
Shelf |
Element code |
HabPelagShelf |
HabPelagShelf |
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Element 2 |
||
Element 2 code |
||
Element 2 code source |
||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Biomass
|
Mean size
|
Threshold value upper |
220.0 |
5.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||
Threshold qualitative |
||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
||
Value achieved upper |
179.0 |
4.2 |
Value achieved lower |
||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
mg per m-3
|
microgram wet weight per ind.
|
Proportion threshold value |
||
Proportion value achieved |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||
Trend |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
Trend: assessed for both parameters together.
Contributes to D1C6 and D4C3 |
Related indicator |
||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||
GES extent threshold |
||
GES extent achieved |
||
GES extent unit |
||
GES achieved |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
Good environmental status for the criterion is assessed for Baltic Sea (BAL-SE-RG-Ostersjon) |
Good environmental status for the criterion is assessed for Baltic Sea (BAL-SE-RG-Ostersjon) |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
Related targets |
|
|