Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D10 / Sweden / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D10 Litter |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2025-10-30 08:59:20 |
ANS-SE-SR-Nordsjon
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
Feature |
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Element |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Macrolitter (all) |
Macrolitter (all) |
Microlitter |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Fishing gear
|
Other plastics
|
Single-use plastics
|
|||
Element source |
EU;OSPAR |
EU;OSPAR |
EU;OSPAR |
EU;OSPAR |
EU;OSPAR |
EU |
Criterion |
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C2
|
Parameter |
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
|
Threshold value upper |
20.0 |
|||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
significant decreasing trend
|
|||||
Threshold value source |
EU
|
National
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
109.0 |
309.0 |
59.0 |
365.0 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
items/100m
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
|
Description parameter |
Sweden tracks the total amount of plastics, along with separate data for single use plastics (SUP) as well as fishing related plastics (FISH). It is important to note that the total amount of plastics (""""other plastics"""" as Element2) includes both fishing related plastics and single use plastics. |
Trend of number of items per square kilometre
|
||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description element |
Sweden has not yet established indicators or threshold values for micro litter. Therefore, we have only conducted a qualitative assessment for microlitter based on the available data. |
|||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
We do not have indicators under this criterion yet, as we are currently working to establish regular monitoring of micro plastics in sediments. Monitoring of micro litter at the national level was carried out as a pilot study in 2020, coordinated with the monitoring programme for contaminants in sediments. Micro litter particles in the size range of 100–300 micrometers, from surface sediments (0–2 cm deep) from 16 offshore stations, were analyzed. We are still waiting for the results of study, but preliminary results indicate that the highest concentrations of microplastics were found in the Baltic Proper. Additionally, there is variation in the results both geographically and in relation to sampling depth. Several other projects and studies have been implemented at national level with the aim of testing and evaluating methods for monitoring micro litter in water and sediments (See chapter Marint skräp, pp. 117) |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
BAL-SE-RG-Ostersjon
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
Feature |
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Element |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Macrolitter (all) |
Macrolitter (all) |
Microlitter |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Fishing gear
|
Other plastics
|
Single-use plastics
|
|||
Element source |
EU;HELCOM |
EU;HELCOM |
EU;HELCOM |
EU;HELCOM |
EU;HELCOM |
EU |
Criterion |
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C2
|
Parameter |
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
|
Threshold value upper |
20.0 |
|||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
significant decreasing trend
|
|||||
Threshold value source |
EU
|
National
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
1.0 |
8.75 |
3.75 |
15.0 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
items/100m
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Description parameter |
Sweden tracks the total amount of plastics, along with separate data for single use plastics (SUP) as well as fishing related plastics (FISH). It is important to note that the total amount of plastics (""""other plastics"""" as Element2) includes both fishing related plastics and single use plastics. |
Trend of number of items per square kilometre
|
||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description element |
Sweden has not yet established indicators or threshold values for micro litter. Therefore, we have only conducted a qualitative assessment for microlitter based on the available data. |
|||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
Sweden’s definition of 'good environmental status' (GES) for macro litter focuses solely on the total abundance and not on specific categories of litter. In terms of threshold values, beach litter is considered to be achieved when there are fewer than 20 macro litter items per 100 metres of coastline. For seafloor litter, the threshold value is achieved when the total amount shows a decreasing trend over the assessment period. Thus, we do not have GES definitions for specific litter categories. |
We do not have indicators under this criterion yet, as we are currently working to establish regular monitoring of micro plastics in sediments. Monitoring of micro litter at the national level was carried out as a pilot study in 2020, coordinated with the monitoring programme for contaminants in sediments. Micro litter particles in the size range of 100–300 micrometers, from surface sediments (0–2 cm deep) from 16 offshore stations, were analyzed. We are still waiting for the results of study, but preliminary results indicate that the highest concentrations of microplastics were found in the Baltic Proper. Additionally, there is variation in the results both geographically and in relation to sampling depth. Several other projects and studies have been implemented at national level with the aim of testing and evaluating methods for monitoring micro litter in water and sediments (See chapter Marint skräp, pp. 117) |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
|
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |