Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D6 / Sweden / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management |
| Report date | 2014-10-31; 2020-10-16 |
| Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
| Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name | MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D1_4_6_WaterColumnHabitats |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
MP_D3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4e - Programme ID | BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-Fish-D14 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-BENT-D146 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-PEL-D14 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
BALSE-COMFISH-D3 |
|
| Q4f - Programme description |
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
|
| Q5e - Natural variability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data | N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment |
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, table
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
e. See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats (last section)
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
a. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
b. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
c. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
d. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
e. See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
|
| Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
After2020 |
After2020 |
After2020 |
After2020 |
After2020 |
|
| Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment |
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
|
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target | C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
D.1 D.2 |
D.1 D.2 |
D.1 D.2 |
D.1 D.2 |
D.1 D.2 |
D.1 D.2 |
D.1 D.2 |
D.1 D.2 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
A.1 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
C.3 C.4 |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
| Q6c - Target updating | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
| Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment |
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Bedömning av tillräcklighet, section Miljökvalitetsnormer
|
|
| Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2020 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
|
| Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment |
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Slutsatser
|
|
| Q7a - Relevant activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities |
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - fisk (D1 och 4), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Bentiska livsmiljöer (D1, 4 och 6), chapter Programmets generella anstats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See Programme Pelagiska livsmiljöer, Chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
See programme Biologisk mångfald - Kommersiellt nyttjade fiskar och skaldjur (D3), chapter Programmets generella ansats
|
|
| Q7c - Relevant measures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2020 |
By2014 |
By2020 |
By2014 |
By2020 |
By2014 |
By2020 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
|
| Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID | BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Al |
BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Al |
BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Lax |
BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Lax |
BALSE-Fish-D14-Kust |
BALSE-Fish-D14-Kust |
BALSE-HAZ-D814-Fiskhalsa |
BALSE-HAZ-D814-Fiskhalsa |
BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning |
BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation |
BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump |
BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump |
BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre |
BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Algblomning |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Algblomning |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Pigment |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Pigment |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Vaxtplankton |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Vaxtplankton |
||||||||||||
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - health status |
Mobile species - health status |
Physical disturbance - from bottom trawling |
Physical disturbance - from bottom trawling |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Physical disturbance - from dredging and disposal of dredged material |
Physical disturbance - from dredging and disposal of dredged material |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Other |
Other |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID | BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Al |
BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Al |
BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Lax |
BALSE-COMFISH-D314-Lax |
BALSE-Fish-D14-Kust |
BALSE-Fish-D14-Kust |
BALSE-HAZ-D814-Fiskhalsa |
BALSE-HAZ-D814-Fiskhalsa |
BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning |
BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation |
BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation |
BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump |
BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump |
BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre |
BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Algblomning |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Algblomning |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Pigment |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Pigment |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Vaxtplankton |
BALSE-PEL-D145-Vaxtplankton |
||||||||||||
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - health status |
Mobile species - health status |
Physical disturbance - from bottom trawling |
Physical disturbance - from bottom trawling |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Physical disturbance - from dredging and disposal of dredged material |
Physical disturbance - from dredging and disposal of dredged material |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Other |
Other |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
| Q4k - Monitoring purpose | StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
Activities |
Activities |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
Activities |
Activities |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
StateImpact |
|||||||||||||
| Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | Monitoring is part of the Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Migratory fish |
Monitoring is part of the Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Migratory fish |
Monitoring is part of the Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Migratory fish |
Monitoring is part of the Common Fisheries Policy - Data Collection Framework
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Migratory fish |
WFD monitoring
Monitoring for the Habitats directive
CFP
HELCOM Monitoring Manual - sub-programme Costal fish |
WFD monitoring
Monitoring for the Habitats directive
CFP
HELCOM Monitoring Manual - sub-programme Costal fish |
"HELCOM COMBINE supporting programme
http://helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/manuals-and-guidelines/combine-manual" |
"HELCOM COMBINE supporting programme
http://helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/manuals-and-guidelines/combine-manual" |
Not relevant (may be included in the HELCOM Monitoring Manual in the future) |
Not relevant (may be included in the HELCOM Monitoring Manual in the future) |
WFD monitoring programme
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Softbottom fauna
Reporting of dumped dredged material to HELCOM |
WFD monitoring programme
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Softbottom fauna
Reporting of dumped dredged material to HELCOM |
"WFD monitoring programme
HELCOM Monitoring Manual, sub-programme Habitat-forming species and substrates |
"WFD monitoring programme
HELCOM Monitoring Manual, sub-programme Habitat-forming species and substrates |
HELCOM guidelines for reporting of dredging and dumping of dredged material will be part of HELCOM monitoring manual |
HELCOM guidelines for reporting of dredging and dumping of dredged material will be part of HELCOM monitoring manual |
WFD monitoring programme
Sub-programme O2, pH, pCO2, H2S in Helcom monitoring manual |
WFD monitoring programme
Sub-programme O2, pH, pCO2, H2S in Helcom monitoring manual |
OSPAR JAMP theme E
|
OSPAR JAMP theme E
|
"WFD monitoring programme
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Pigments |
"WFD monitoring programme
Helcom monitoring manual - sub-programme Pigments |
"WFD monitoring programme
Sub-programme Species composition, abundance and biomass in HELCOM Monitoring Manual |
"WFD monitoring programme
Sub-programme Species composition, abundance and biomass in HELCOM Monitoring Manual |
|||||||||||||
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Q9a - Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q41 Spatial scope | WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ BeyondMSwaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ BeyondMSwaters |
WFD_TW WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ BeyondMSwaters |
WFD_TW WFD_CW TerritorialWaters EEZ BeyondMSwaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
WFD_CW TerritorialWaters |
|||||||||||||
| Q4j - Description of spatial scope |
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - ål, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - ål, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - lax, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - lax, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Kustprovfiske, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig omfattning
|
See sub-programme Kustprovfiske, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig omfattning
|
See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Omfattning av trålning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Omfattning av trålning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande bottenfauna, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande bottenfauna, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Pelagialens egenskaper - Syrekoncentration, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Pelagialens egenskaper - Syrekoncentration, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Skadliga algblomningar, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Skadliga algblomningar, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Växyplankton - Pigment, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Växyplankton - Pigment, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Växtplankton och pelagiska bakterier, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
See sub-programme Växtplankton och pelagiska bakterier, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
|
|||||||||||||
| Marine Unit IDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date | 2004-9999 |
2004-9999 |
2004-9999 |
2004-9999 |
1960-9999 |
1960-9999 |
1988-9999 |
1988-9999 |
1998-9999 |
1998-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1996-9999 |
1996-9999 |
- |
- |
1902-9999 |
1902-9999 |
2002-9999 |
2002-9999 |
1982-9999 |
1982-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1983-9999 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Q9c - Monitoring method | Test fishing is carried out according to methods under revison and descriptions of methods will be avalible on the web in the future. |
Test fishing is carried out according to methods under revison and descriptions of methods will be avalible on the web in the future. |
Test fishing is carried out according to methods under revison and descriptions of methods will be avalible on the web in the future. |
Test fishing is carried out according to methods under revison and descriptions of methods will be avalible on the web in the future. |
Test fishing with nets according to the Swedish monitoring method described in "Provfiske i Östersjöns kustområden- Djupstratifierat provfiske med Nordiska kustöversiktsnät". https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb280005491/1348912813575/undersokstyp-provfiske-ostersjon-kustomraden-djupstratifierat-provfiske-med-nordiska-kustoversiktsnat.pdf |
Test fishing with nets according to the Swedish monitoring method described in "Provfiske i Östersjöns kustområden- Djupstratifierat provfiske med Nordiska kustöversiktsnät". https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb280005491/1348912813575/undersokstyp-provfiske-ostersjon-kustomraden-djupstratifierat-provfiske-med-nordiska-kustoversiktsnat.pdf |
"Undersökningstyp Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk – biologiska effekter på subcellulär och cellulär nivå
http://www.naturvardsverket.se/upload/stod-i-miljoarbetet/vagledning/miljoovervakning/Handledning/Metoder/Undersokningstyper/kust%20och%20hav/fiskhalso.pdf" |
"Undersökningstyp Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk – biologiska effekter på subcellulär och cellulär nivå
http://www.naturvardsverket.se/upload/stod-i-miljoarbetet/vagledning/miljoovervakning/Handledning/Metoder/Undersokningstyper/kust%20och%20hav/fiskhalso.pdf" |
FAO 1998. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries - Fishing Operations - 1 Suppl. 1 - 1. Vessel Monitoring Systems, 1998, Rome |
FAO 1998. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries - Fishing Operations - 1 Suppl. 1 - 1. Vessel Monitoring Systems, 1998, Rome |
Nationell undersökningstyp för provtagning av mjukbottenfauna - https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb28000401/1348912813195/Mjukbottenlevande+makrofauna,+trend-+och+omr%C3%A5des%C3%B6vervakning.pdf |
Nationell undersökningstyp för provtagning av mjukbottenfauna - https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb28000401/1348912813195/Mjukbottenlevande+makrofauna,+trend-+och+omr%C3%A5des%C3%B6vervakning.pdf |
"Vegetationsklädda bottnar, Ostkust
https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb28000549/1348912814994/Vegetationskl%C3%A4dda+bottnar,+ostkust.pdf |
"Vegetationsklädda bottnar, Ostkust
https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb28000549/1348912814994/Vegetationskl%C3%A4dda+bottnar,+ostkust.pdf |
https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb2800013340/1348912854298/muddring-och-hantering-av-muddermassor-bilaga-1-o-2.pdf |
https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb2800013340/1348912854298/muddring-och-hantering-av-muddermassor-bilaga-1-o-2.pdf |
Undersökningstyp: Syrehalt i bottenvatten, https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb2800020/1348912814827/Syrehalt+i+bottenvatten.pdf |
Undersökningstyp: Syrehalt i bottenvatten, https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.64f5b3211343cffddb2800020/1348912814827/Syrehalt+i+bottenvatten.pdf |
The satellite calibrate their data against a fixed buoy each day as it passes over the buoy. The satellites reading is then compared with the buoy's registration. The raw data that are are transmitted from the satellite are brought together and each pixel in the images gets a mark of quality and areas where the images have missed some areas are marked. |
The satellite calibrate their data against a fixed buoy each day as it passes over the buoy. The satellites reading is then compared with the buoy's registration. The raw data that are are transmitted from the satellite are brought together and each pixel in the images gets a mark of quality and areas where the images have missed some areas are marked. |
HELCOM COMBINE Manual (Helcom 2014b, se Annex HC-C-4 för metod), will be replaced with HELCOM monitoring manual. |
HELCOM COMBINE Manual (Helcom 2014b, se Annex HC-C-4 för metod), will be replaced with HELCOM monitoring manual. |
"Växtplankton - HELCOM COMBINE Manual (Helcom 2014b, se Annex C6)
Primärproduktion - HELCOM COMBINE Manual (Helcom 2014b)" |
"Växtplankton - HELCOM COMBINE Manual (Helcom 2014b, se Annex C6)
Primärproduktion - HELCOM COMBINE Manual (Helcom 2014b)" |
|||||||||||||
| Q9d - Description of alteration to method | Time series started before 2002 are carried out according to the Swedish monitoring method described in "Provfiske med kustöversikttsnät, nätlänkar och ryssjor ". |
Time series started before 2002 are carried out according to the Swedish monitoring method described in "Provfiske med kustöversikttsnät, nätlänkar och ryssjor ". |
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande bottenfauna, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande bottenfauna, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Metoder |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9e - Quality assurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Q9f - Quality control | DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
OtherQC |
OtherQC |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
DelayedValidation |
DelayedValidation |
OtherQC |
OtherQC |
OtherQC |
OtherQC |
OtherQC |
OtherQC |
|||||||||||||
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % | 39 |
39 |
10 |
10 |
74 |
74 |
50 |
50 |
40 |
40 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
||||||||||||||||
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples | Approximate number of samples expected to be taken from the assessment area and Proportion of geographic scope covered by sampling is also unknown since it depends on the activity of the commercial fishery. |
Approximate number of samples expected to be taken from the assessment area and Proportion of geographic scope covered by sampling is also unknown since it depends on the activity of the commercial fishery. |
Approximate number of samples expected to be taken from the assessment area and Proportion of geographic scope covered by sampling is unknown since it is difficult to estimate. |
Approximate number of samples expected to be taken from the assessment area and Proportion of geographic scope covered by sampling is unknown since it is difficult to estimate. |
1 sample from 12 locations = 12 samples/year |
1 sample from 12 locations = 12 samples/year |
25 samples from 3 locations = 75 samples/year |
25 samples from 3 locations = 75 samples/year |
176 |
176 |
One sample yearly - every 3 years from 689 locations (more stations every 5 years) = 450 - 700 samples/year |
One sample yearly - every 3 years from 689 locations (more stations every 5 years) = 450 - 700 samples/year |
130-200 |
130-200 |
12 |
12 |
5091 samples from 547 locations during 2011 |
5091 samples from 547 locations during 2011 |
"Remote sensing - 1 image per day during three months = 92 images
Harmful algaes - 2-24 samples from 19 locations = 230 samples/year" |
"Remote sensing - 1 image per day during three months = 92 images
Harmful algaes - 2-24 samples from 19 locations = 230 samples/year" |
1-26 samples from 132 locations = 531 samples/year |
1-26 samples from 132 locations = 531 samples/year |
1-26 samples from 41 locations = 313 samples/year |
1-26 samples from 41 locations = 313 samples/year |
||||||||||||
| Q9i - Description of sample representivity | See sub-programme Migrerande fisk - ål, parameter table and chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Migrerande fisk - ål, parameter table and chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Migrerande fisk - Lax, parameter table and chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Migrerande fisk - Lax, parameter table and chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Kustprovfiske, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig omfattning |
See sub-programme Kustprovfiske, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig omfattning |
See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Omfattning av trålning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning and Metoder |
See sub-programme Omfattning av trålning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning and Metoder |
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande makrofauna, parameter table in the initial section, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning and Metoder |
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande makrofauna, parameter table in the initial section, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning and Metoder |
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Metoder (parameters) and chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning.
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, parameter table. |
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Metoder (parameters) and chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning.
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, parameter table. |
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning and chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning and chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Pelagialens egenskaper - Syrekoncentration, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Pelagialens egenskaper - Syrekoncentration, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Skadliga algblomningar, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Skadliga algblomningar, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Växyplankton - Pigment, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Växyplankton - Pigment, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning |
See sub-programme Växyplankton och pelagiska bakterier, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
See sub-programme Växyplankton och pelagiska bakterier, parameter table. |
See sub-programme Växyplankton och pelagiska bakterier, chapter Rumslig och tidsmässig täckning
See sub-programme Växyplankton och pelagiska bakterier, parameter table. |
|||||||||||||
| Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Metoder |
"See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande makrofauna, chapter Metoder |
"See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande makrofauna, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Metoder |
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Metoder |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type | UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData DataProducts |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData DataProducts |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData |
UnprocessedData |
UnprocessedData |
UnprocessedData |
UnprocessedData |
UnprocessedData |
UnprocessedData DataProducts |
UnprocessedData DataProducts |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
UnprocessedData ProcessedData |
||||||||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism | LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
LocationNationalDC |
LocationNationalDC |
URLview |
URLview |
URLview |
URLview |
LocationInternationalDC |
LocationInternationalDC |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
URLdownload |
||||||||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights | Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
Open |
||||||||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available | 2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
2014-09 |
||||||||||||
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency | Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
||||||||||||||
| Q10d - Description of data access |
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - ål, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - ål, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - lax, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Migrerande fiskarter - lax, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Kustprovfiske, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Kustprovfiske, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Omfattning av trålning, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Omfattning av trålning, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande bottenfauna, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Mjukbottenlevande bottenfauna, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Var finns data |
See sub-programme Makrovegetation, chapter Var finns data |
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Omfattning av muddring och dumpning, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Pelagialens egenskaper - Syrekoncentration, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Pelagialens egenskaper - Syrekoncentration, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Skadliga algblomningar, chapter Var finns data?
|
See sub-programme Skadliga algblomningar, chapter Var finns data?
|
See sub-programme Växyplankton - Pigment, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Växyplankton - Pigment, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Växtplankton och pelagiska bakterier, chapter Var finns data
|
See sub-programme Växtplankton och pelagiska bakterier, chapter Var finns data
|
|||||||||||||
Descriptor |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients.
Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development.
A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is.
Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats).
The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect.
" |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Gaps and plans |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4).
Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia.
Specific plans of improvements:
Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats.
However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates.
Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear.
Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems.
" |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes |
SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes |
SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes |
SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes |
SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab |
SE-D1D5-oxygenph |
SE-D1D5-oxygenph |
SE-D1D5-oxygenph |
SE-D1D5-oxygenph |
SE-D1D5-oxygenph |
SE-D1D5-oxygenph |
SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos |
SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos |
SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos |
SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos |
SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos |
SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance |
Programme name |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Macrophytes |
Macrophytes |
Macrophytes |
Macrophytes |
Macrophytes |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Benthic habitats |
Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH) |
Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH) |
Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH) |
Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH) |
Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH) |
Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH) |
Macrozoobenthos - infauna |
Macrozoobenthos - infauna |
Macrozoobenthos - infauna |
Macrozoobenthos - infauna |
Macrozoobenthos - infauna |
Macrozoobenthos - infauna |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Physical disturbance and loss |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Programme description |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs.
During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme.
Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring.
Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year |
The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs.
During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme.
Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring.
Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year |
The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs.
During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme.
Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring.
Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year |
The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs.
During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme.
Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring.
Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year |
The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs.
During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme.
Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring.
Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures).
Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection.
The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea.
In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w |
Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions.
The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs.
Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993.
Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly.
Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders. |
Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions.
The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs.
Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993.
Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly.
Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders. |
Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions.
The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs.
Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993.
Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly.
Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders. |
Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions.
The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs.
Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993.
Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly.
Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders. |
Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions.
The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs.
Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993.
Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly.
Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders. |
Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions.
The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs.
Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993.
Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly.
Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders. |
Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans.
The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities.
Sampling primarily every year or every other year
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea. |
Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans.
The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities.
Sampling primarily every year or every other year
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea. |
Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans.
The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities.
Sampling primarily every year or every other year
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea. |
Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans.
The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities.
Sampling primarily every year or every other year
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea. |
Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans.
The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities.
Sampling primarily every year or every other year
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea. |
Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans.
The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities.
Sampling primarily every year or every other year
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea. |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange).
Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed.
To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed.
Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development.
Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967.
In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
||||||||||
Monitoring details |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Canalisation and other watercourse modifications
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Land claim
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Canalisation and other watercourse modifications
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Land claim
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Canalisation and other watercourse modifications
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Land claim
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Pelagic broad habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Chemical characteristics
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Canalisation and other watercourse modifications
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Land claim
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
GES criteria |
D3C2 |
D3C3 |
D4C2 |
D4C2 |
D4C3 |
D4C3 |
D6C5 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D5C6 |
D5C7 |
D6C5 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D6C3 |
D6C3 |
D6C4 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D6C5 |
D7C2 |
D7C2 |
D1C6 |
D5C5 |
D6C5 |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
NotRelevan |
D4C1 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D4C2 |
D5C8 |
D6C5 |
D6C1 |
D6C2 |
D7C2 |
D7C2 |
||||||||
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Parameter Other |
Age distribution Sex distribution |
Age distribution Sex distribution |
Age distribution Sex distribution |
Abundance (number of individuals) Size distributio |
Species composition |
Species composition |
Oxygen debt |
Oxygen debt |
Species composition Abundance (number of individua |
Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an |
Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an |
Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an |
Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an |
Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range) Distri |
Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range) Distri |
Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an |
Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an |
Extent Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range) |
Extent Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range) |
Oxygen debt Ph pco2 - alkalinity Concentration in |
Oxygen debt |
Oxygen debt H2S Ph pco2 - alkalinity Concentratio |
Species composition |
Species composition |
Biomass Species composition |
Abundance (number of individuals) Biomass Species |
Extent |
Extent |
||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
2022-9999 |
1893-9999 |
1893-9999 |
1893-9999 |
1893-9999 |
1893-9999 |
1893-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1971-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1967-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020. |
The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020. |
The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020. |
The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020. |
The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths.
Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable. |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook.
Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters.
A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021.
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf |
Quality control |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
Will be developed during test-phase
|
The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty. |
The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty. |
The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty. |
The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty. |
The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty. |
The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty. |
The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy.
In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy.
In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy.
In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy.
In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy.
In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy.
In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually.
Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data. |
Data management |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency. |
Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA.
SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI. |
Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA.
SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI. |
Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA.
SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI. |
Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA.
SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI. |
Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA.
SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI. |
Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA.
SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI. |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed.
Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service.
SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report.
Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development). |
|||||||||||
Data access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Contact |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
References |