Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D5 / North East Atlantic

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2012-10-15
GES Descriptor D5 Eutrophication
Region/subregion North East Atlantic
Reported by Member state
Member state
SE
DK
DE
NL
BE
FR
UK
IE
ES
PT
Marine reporting units Number used
66
2
2
1
1
4
10
1
55
73
Features No theme
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOConcentration (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOConcentration (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOConcentration (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOConcentration (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOConcentration (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOConcentration (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1)
LevelPressureNConcentration (1)
LevelPressureNLoad (1)
LevelPressureOConcentration (1)
LevelPressureOLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
LevelPressurePConcentration (1)
LevelPressurePLoad (1)
LevelPressureOverall (1)
Elements No theme
NotRelevant (2)
NotRelevant (2)
NotReported (1)
Elements Predominant habitats
HabitatsOther (1)
MarineCoast (1)
ShelfMxdSed (1)
MarineCoast (1)
ShallMud (1)
ShallSand (1)
LitRock (1)
LitSed (1)
MarineCoast (1)
ShallCoarseSed (1)
ShallMud (1)
ShallMxdSed (1)
ShallRock (1)
ShallSand (1)
MarineCoast (1)
Elements Physical/chemical features
NutrientLevels (1)
OxygenLevels (1)
Transparency (1)
NutrientLevels (2)
OxygenLevels (2)
Transparency (1)
NutrientLevels (1)
OxygenLevels (1)
Criteria used D5 Eutrophication
Criteria used D5C1 Nutrient concentrations (5.1, 5.1.1)
5.1, 5.1.1
5.1, 5.1.1
5.1, 5.1.1
5.1, 5.1.1
5.1, 5.1.1
5.1
Criteria used D5C2 Chlorophyll-a concentration (5.2.1)
5.2.1
5.2.1
5.2.1
5.2.1
5.2.1
Criteria used D5C3 Harmful algal blooms (5.2.4)
5.2.4
5.2.4
Criteria used D5C4 Photic limit (5.2.2)
5.2.2
Criteria used D5C5 Dissolved oxygen concentration (5.3.2)
5.3.2
5.3.2
Criteria used D5C6 Opportunistic macroalgae of benthic habitats (5.2.3)
5.2.3
Criteria used D5C7 Macrophyte communities of benthic habitats (5.3.1)
5.3.1
Criteria used D5C8 Macrofaunal communities of benthic habitats
Criteria used 5.1.2 Nutrient ratios (silica, nitrogen and phosphorus)
5.1.2
Criteria used 5.2 Direct effects of nutrient enrichment
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
Criteria used 5.3 Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
Threshold values % of indicators with values (no. of indicators reported)
25.0% (4)
100.0% (5)
100.0% (12)
85.7% (7)
100.0% (3)
0.0% (0)
100.0% (6)
0.0% (0)
0.0% (0)
0.0% (0)
Proportion threshold values Range of % values (no. of indicators reported)
100% (western Baltic Sea coastal waters) - 100% (western Baltic Sea coastal waters) (1)
-7777 - 50 (6)
Baseline No. of indicators reported per response
2,1-2,4 mg/m3 (2012) (1)
Bis zu 1 Seemeile von Basislinie: WRRL zieht Nährstoffe nur als Begleitparameter heran; Referenzbedingungen (natürliche Hintergrundkonzentrationen) siehe OGewV 1 Seemeile: Für Nitrat wurden unter OSPAR COMP Orientierungswerte auf der Basis natürlicher Hintergrundkonzentrationen plus einer 50 prozentigen akzeptablen Abweichung von diesen Hintergrundkonzentrationen abgeleitet (1)
Bis zu 1 Seemeile von Basislinie: WRRL zieht Nährstoffe nur als Begleitparameter heran; Referenzbedingungen (natürliche Hintergrundkonzentrationen) siehe OGewV 1 Seemeile: Für Phosphorkonzentrationen wurden unter OSPAR COMP Orientierungswerte auf der Basis natürlicher Hintergrundkonzentrationen plus einer 50 prozentigen akzeptablen Abweichung von diesen Hintergrundkonzentrationen abgeleitet (1)
Bis zu 1 Seemeile von Basislinie: WRRL zieht Sichttiefe nur als Begleitparameter heran; 1 Seemeile von der Basislinie: Natürliche Hintergrundkonzentrationen für die Sichttiefe unter OSPAR COMP wurden über Korrelationen mit natürlichen Hintergrundkonzentrationen für TN ermittelt. Die Orientierungswerte ergeben sich aus einer akzeptablen Abweichung von diesen Hintergrundkonzentrationen von 50%. (1)
Bis zu 1 Seemeile von Basislinie: unter der WRRL keine Bewertung des Nährstoffverhältnisses Gemäß OSPAR COMP basiert der Orientierungswert für das N/P-Verhältnis auf einer 50% Abweichung vom natürlichen Redfield-Verhältnis (2)
Bis zu 1 Seemeile von der Basislinie: WRRL siehe Carlette & Heiskanen 2009: Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Part 3: Coastal and Transitional Waters; Aktualisierung in 2012/13 wird erwartet 1 Seemeile von der Basislinie: die bei OSPAR COMP zugrunde gelegten Schwellenwerte für die Zellzahlen beruhen auf Schätzwerten und sind nicht wissenschaftlich fundiert (1)
Bis zu 1 Seemeile von der Basislinie: WRRL siehe Carlette & Heiskanen 2009: Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Part 3: Coastal and Transitional Waters? 1 Seemeile von der Basislinie: unter OSPAR COMP wurde als Referenzwert die maximal mögliche Biomasse basierend auf natürlichen Hintergrundkonzentrationen von Chlorophyll a berechnet; der Orientierungswert ergibt sich aus einer maximal zulässigen Abweichung von dieser Biomassereferenz von 50% (1)
WRRL: siehe Carlette & Heiskanen 2009: Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Part 3: Coastal and Transitional Waters; Aktualisierung in 2012/13 wird erwartet (1)
WRRL: siehe Carlette & Heiskanen 2009: Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Part 3: Coastal and Transitional Waters; Aktualisierung in 2012/13 wird erwartet OSPAR COMP: für Chlorophyll wurden Orientierungswerte auf der Basis natürlicher Hintergrundkonzentrationen plus einer akzeptablen Abweichung von diesen Hintergrundkonzentrationen von 50% abgeleitet (1)
WRRL: siehe Carlette & Heiskanen 2009: Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Part 3: Coastal and Transitional Waters; Aktualisierung in 2012/13 wird erwartet OSPAR: keine Bewertung (2)
salinity-related natural background level (3)
"Reference values used for OSPAR Comprehensive Procedure:

Coastal waters: normalised to a salinity of 32, reference value = 13 μM.

Offshore waters: normalised to a salinity of 34.5, reference value = 10 μM.

Standard background Redfield N/P ratio value = 16." (1)
"— Chlorophyll concentration in the water column threshold values:
Coastal waters 15 μg l-1 (ref value + 50%),
Offshore waters 10 μg l-1 (ref value + 50%).

— Abundance of opportunistic macroalgae threshold value:
Biomass >500 mg m2 wet weight + cover >15% of intertidal area, + entrained algae >5%, + absolute area or % of waterbody area affected >5%.

— Phytoplankton composition in the water column:
Scotland
[Total cell counts assessment of occurrences over 107 cells l-1
Any single taxon count >500,000 cells l-1 for coastal waters and estuaries
Counts of chlorophyll, occurrences exceeding 10 μg l-1]
The incidence of counts exceeding these values should be <25% of all sampling times over 5 years.
Rest of UK
[Total cell count, assessment of occurrences over 107 cells l-1
Phaeocystis cell count, occurrences over 106 cells l-1
Any single taxon, occurrences over 106 cells l-1
Counts of chlorophyll, occurrences exceeding 10 μg l-1]
The incidence of counts exceeding these values should be <25% of all sampling times over 5 years.

— Dissolved oxygen concentration in the water column:
< 4.0 mg l-1" (1)
Unknown (4)
Proportion values achieved No. of criteria reported per category
 ca 200 000 ton/år i Kattegatt, ca 30 000 ton/år i Skagerrak (2000-2010). Angivet som TOC. (1 or 11.1%)
28 000 ton antropogent kväve tillfördes Nordsjön från Sverige 2009 (land och atm deposition). (1 or 11.1%)
50-75% (1 or 11.1%)
NotReported (4 or 44.4%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (1 or 11.1%)
ca 510 ton fosfor tillfördes Nordsjön under 2009 (1 or 11.1%)
1,090 (1 or 12.5%)
10,770 (1 or 12.5%)
25-50% (2 or 25.0%)
43,800 (1 or 12.5%)
75-100% (3 or 37.5%)
 418.016 t/a (Zeitraum 2000-2005) (1 or 11.1%)
- (1 or 11.1%)
18.135 t/a (Zeitraum 2000-2005) (1 or 11.1%)
75-100% (4 or 44.4%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (2 or 22.2%)
18 (1 or 11.1%)
378 (1 or 11.1%)
5-25% (5 or 55.6%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (2 or 22.2%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (9 or 100.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (9 or 100.0%)
137 (1 or 11.1%)
5-25% (3 or 33.3%)
9.2 (1 or 11.1%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (3 or 33.3%)
lessthan1% (1 or 11.1%)
231 (1 or 11.1%)
34607 (1 or 11.1%)
4 (1 or 11.1%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (1 or 11.1%)
lessthan1% (5 or 55.6%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (1 or 100.0%)
Assessment trend (status) No. of criteria assessments per category
Improving (2 or 66.7%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (1 or 33.3%)
Improving (6 or 100.0%)
Stable (2 or 40.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (3 or 60.0%)
Improving (3 or 50.0%)
Stable (2 or 33.3%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (1 or 16.7%)
Improving (3 or 100.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (6 or 100.0%)
Stable (2 or 33.3%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (4 or 66.7%)
Improving (1 or 16.7%)
Stable (1 or 16.7%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (4 or 66.7%)
Criteria status No. of criteria assessments per category
Description (3 or 100.0%)
NotGood (6 or 100.0%)
NotAssessed (3 or 60.0%)
NotGood (2 or 40.0%)
NotAssessed (1 or 16.7%)
OtherStatus (5 or 83.3%)
OtherStatus (3 or 100.0%)
Descriptive (2 or 33.3%)
NotAssessed (4 or 66.7%)
NotAssessed (4 or 66.7%)
OtherStatus (2 or 33.3%)
Good (1 or 16.7%)
NotAssessed (1 or 16.7%)
OtherStatus (4 or 66.7%)
Assessment period
1980 - 2012
2010 - 2010
1990 - 2007
1998 - 2007
Related activities
AgricultForestry, Urban, UsesActivitiesOther
AgricultForestry, Industry, Urban
AgricultForestry, Shipping, Urban
AgricultForestry, Industry, Urban
AgricultForestry, Industry, NotReported
NotReported
AgricultForestry, NotReported, Urban
AgricultForestry, Industry, Urban
Aquaculture, Industry, Urban