Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D10 / Baltic
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D10 Litter |
| Region/subregion | Baltic |
| Reported by | Member state |
| Member state | FI |
EE |
LV |
LT |
PL |
DE |
DK |
SE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine reporting units | Number used | 8 |
1 |
10 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
66 |
| Features | No theme | ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (1) ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1) ImpactPressureWaterColumn (2) LevelPressureSeabed (1) LevelPressureShore (2) LevelPressureWater (3) |
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (1) ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1) ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1) LevelPressureSeabed (1) LevelPressureShore (1) LevelPressureWater (1) |
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (1) ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1) ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1) LevelPressureSeabed (1) LevelPressureShore (1) LevelPressureWater (1) |
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (1) ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1) ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1) LevelPressureSeabed (1) LevelPressureShore (1) LevelPressureWater (1) |
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (1) ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1) ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1) LevelPressureSeabed (1) LevelPressureShore (1) LevelPressureWater (1) |
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (1) ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1) ImpactPressureWaterColumn (1) LevelPressureSeabed (1) LevelPressureShore (1) LevelPressureWater (1) |
||
| Elements | Predominant habitats | HabitatsOther (1) |
HabitatsOther (1) MarineCoast (1) MarineShelf (1) |
||||||
| Elements | Functional group | FunctionalGroupOther (2) |
|||||||
| Elements | No theme | NotRelevant (3) |
NotRelevant (3) |
NotReported (3) |
|||||
| Criteria used | D10 Litter | ||||||||
| Criteria used | D10C1 Litter (excluding micro-litter) (10.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2) | 10.1.2 |
10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.1 |
10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.1 |
10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.1 |
10.1, 10.1.2 |
|||
| Criteria used | D10C2 Micro-litter (10.1, 10.1.3) | 10.1.3 |
10.1, 10.1.3 |
10.1 |
10.1 |
10.1 |
|||
| Criteria used | D10C3 Litter ingested (10.1, 10.2.1) | 10.2.1 |
10.1, 10.2.1 |
10.1, 10.2.1 |
10.1, 10.2.1 |
10.1 |
|||
| Criteria used | D10C4 Adverse effects of litter (10.2) | 10.2 |
10.2 |
10.2 |
10.2 |
||||
| Threshold values | % of indicators with values (no. of indicators reported) | 0.0% (0) |
100.0% (6) |
0.0% (0) |
100.0% (6) |
0.0% (0) |
100.0% (4) |
100.0% (3) |
0.0% (6) |
| Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of indicators reported) | 100 - 100 (6) |
-8888 - -8888 (3) |
||||||
| Baseline | No. of indicators reported per response | not developed (6) |
In den Anrainerstaaten der Ostsee variierten die gefundenen Müllmengen zwischen zwei und 328 Kilogramm (4-181 Stück) pro 500 Meter Küstenabschnitt. Die höchstenAbfallmengen betrugen 700 und 1.200 Stück pro 100 m Küstenlinie, vergleichbar mit den Mengen, die an Strandabschnitten der nördlichen Nordsee gefunden wurden (OSPAR, 2007). Die Umweltorganisation ?The Ocean Conservancy? schlussfolgerte aus den Ergebnissen eigener jährlicher Küstenreinigungsaktionen, dass fast 58% des gesammelten Mülls durch menschliche Aktivitäten inklusive Freizeitaktivitäten an der Küste verursacht werden. (1) In den Gewässern der westlichen Ostsee wurde 1996 über Schleppnetzuntersuchungen der Müll am Meeresboden quantifiziert. Mit 1,26 ± 0,82 Stück pro Hektar waren die Zahlen mit den Ergebnissen aus der Nordsee vergleichbar (Galgani et al., 2000). (1) Während flächendeckender Befliegungen der deutschen Ostsee wurden hohe Mülldichten und ein Zusammenhang zwischen Schiffs- und Mülldichte beobachtet (Herr, 2009). (1) |
To be established by 2015 (3) |
|||||
| Proportion values achieved | No. of criteria reported per category | Unknown_NotAssessed (10 or 100.0%) |
Unknown_NotAssessed (6 or 100.0%) |
1-5% (1 or 16.7%) 3 (1 or 16.7%) Unknown_NotAssessed (3 or 50.0%) lessthan1% (1 or 16.7%) |
1,26 ± 0,82 Stück (1 or 16.7%) 2-328 Kilogramm (4-181 Stück) (1 or 16.7%) Unknown_NotAssessed (4 or 66.7%) |
126 (1 or 16.7%) Unknown_NotAssessed (5 or 83.3%) |
0,20 kg/km trålning. (1 or 16.7%) 1,72 (1 or 16.7%) Unknown/not assessed (1 or 16.7%) Unknown_NotAssessed (2 or 33.3%) a) 1,5 ± 1,4, b) 1,6 ± 2,2 (1 or 16.7%) |
||
| Assessment trend (status) | No. of criteria assessments per category | Unknown_NotAssessed (7 or 100.0%) |
Unknown_NotAssessed (6 or 100.0%) |
Unknown_NotAssessed (6 or 100.0%) |
Declining (1 or 25.0%) Unknown_NotAssessed (3 or 75.0%) |
Unknown_NotAssessed (5 or 100.0%) |
NotReported (3 or 50.0%) Unknown_NotAssessed (3 or 50.0%) |
||
| Criteria status | No. of criteria assessments per category | NotAssessed (7 or 100.0%) |
NotAssessed (6 or 100.0%) |
NotAssessed (6 or 100.0%) |
NotAssessed (3 or 75.0%) NotGood (1 or 25.0%) |
Descriptive (1 or 20.0%) Good (2 or 40.0%) NotAssessed (2 or 40.0%) |
NotAssessed (3 or 50.0%) NotReported (3 or 50.0%) |
||
| Assessment period | |||||||||
| Related activities | ActivitiesUsesAll, NotReported, TourismRecreation |
NotReported, Shipping, TourismRecreation |
Ports, Shipping, TourismRecreation |
Industry, Shipping, TourismRecreation |
NotReported |
Fisheries, Shipping, TourismRecreation |