Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D8 / Baltic

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2012-10-15
GES Descriptor D8 Contaminants
Region/subregion Baltic
Reported by Member state
Member state
FI
EE
LV
LT
PL
DE
DK
SE
Marine reporting units Number used
8
1
10
4
0
2
2
66
Features No theme
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (1)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (1)
LevelPressure (1)
LevelPressureBathingHigher (2)
LevelPressureBathingLower (2)
LevelPressureContaminant (1)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureSea (1)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (3)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3)
ImpactPressureShellfish (1)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (2)
LevelPressure (1)
LevelPressureAir (2)
LevelPressureBathingHigher (1)
LevelPressureBathingLower (1)
LevelPressureContaminant (1)
LevelPressureEnvironment (2)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (2)
LevelPressureLand (2)
LevelPressureOther (1)
LevelPressureSea (2)
LevelPressureShellfishHigher (1)
LevelPressureShellfishLower (1)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (3)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureSea (3)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (4)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (4)
ImpactPressureShellfish (1)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressure (1)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureBathingHigher (1)
LevelPressureBathingLower (1)
LevelPressureContaminant (1)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureOther (1)
LevelPressureSea (3)
LevelPressureShellfishHigher (1)
LevelPressureShellfishLower (1)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (4)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (4)
ImpactPressureShellfish (1)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressure (1)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureBathingHigher (1)
LevelPressureBathingLower (1)
LevelPressureContaminant (1)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureOther (1)
LevelPressureSea (3)
LevelPressureShellfishHigher (1)
LevelPressureShellfishLower (1)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (4)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (4)
ImpactPressureShellfish (1)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressure (1)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureContaminant (1)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (2)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureOther (1)
LevelPressureSea (3)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (4)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (4)
ImpactPressureShellfish (1)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressure (1)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureBathingHigher (1)
LevelPressureBathingLower (1)
LevelPressureContaminant (1)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureOther (1)
LevelPressureSea (3)
LevelPressureShellfishHigher (1)
LevelPressureShellfishLower (1)
Elements Species group
FishAll (2)
BirdsAll (3)
FishAll (1)
FishAll (5)
BirdsAll (1)
MammalsAll (1)
Elements No theme
NotRelevant (7)
NotRelevant (1)
NotRelevant (6)
Not assessed (6)
Not reported (2)
Elements Functional group
FunctionalGroupOther (1)
FunctionalGroupOther (1)
Elements Predominant habitats
HabitatsOther (3)
HabitatsOther (4)
HabitatsOther (2)
Criteria used D8 Contaminants
Criteria used D8C1 Contaminants in environment (8.1, 8.1.1)
8.1
8.1, 8.1.1
8.1, 8.1.1
8.1, 8.1.1
8.1
Criteria used D8C2 Adverse effects of contaminants (8.2, 8.2.1)
8.2, 8.2.1
8.2, 8.2.1
8.2
Criteria used D8C3 Significant acute pollution events (8.2.2)
8.2.2
8.2.2
Criteria used D8C4 Adverse effects of significant pollution events (8.2.2)
8.2.2
8.2.2
Threshold values % of indicators with values (no. of indicators reported)
0.0% (0)
100.0% (15)
100.0% (8)
100.0% (21)
0.0% (0)
100.0% (99)
100.0% (6)
47.1% (17)
Proportion threshold values Range of % values (no. of indicators reported)
100 - 100 (21)
-8888 - -8888 (1)
Baseline No. of indicators reported per response
not developed (15)
1990 (1)
2004-2011 (2)
2004–2009 (2)
2007-2011 (1)
2007–2011 (2)
2008-2011 (3)
2009-2011 (2)
Abgeleitet aus epidemiologischen Studien zum Erkrankungsrisiko beim Baden (ab 2011) (1)
Die PCB sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 0.01ng/g TM (9)
Die PCB sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 1pg/L. (9)
Die Pestizide sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 0.01ng/g TM (9)
Die Pestizide sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 1pg/L. (9)
Die Pestizide sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter der Bestimmungsgrenze. (9)
ICES BAC recommendation for 1-hydroxypyrene in dab and flounder: 16 ng/ml (9)
OPSAR BCs/BACs normalisiert auf 5% Al: Hg 50/70; Cd: 200/310; Pb: 25000/38000 (3)
OSPAR LL, BAC: Mussels: OSPAR-BAC (µg/kg dry weight): Hg 140, Cd 1940, Pb 1520; Fish OSPAR-BAC (µg/kg wet weight): Hg: 35, Cd 26 , Pb 26(Source:Background Document on CEMP Assessment Criteria for QSR 2010) (3)
mussels OSPAR LC: CB118, CB153, CB180 =0.25 µg/kg dwFish, seabirds: OSPAR LC: CB118, CB153, CB180 =0.05 µg/kg ww; OSPAR BAC CB 118 = 1.3 µg/kg ww; CB153 = 0.2 µg/kg ww; Cb180 = 0.5 µg/kg ww(Source: Background Document onCEMP Assessment Criteria for QSR 2010. Monitoring and Assessment Series. Publ.-No. 461. OSPAR Commission, 2009) (9)
nach EU HygienerechtRichtlinien 853/2004 und 854/2004 (1)
not defined (6)
According to EU regulation (4)
To be established (1)
Proportion values achieved No. of criteria reported per category
1-5% (1 or 6.7%)
75-100% (4 or 26.7%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (10 or 66.7%)
1-5% (4 or 16.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (18 or 72.0%)
lessthan1% (3 or 12.0%)
75-100% (1 or 4.2%)
Maksimālais dioksīnu un furānu emisijas apjoms, 31,2 g TEQ, tika reģistrēts 2009. gadā, savukārt, zemākās emisijas, 26, 8 g TEQ un 26,2 g TEQ , tika reģistrētas attiecīgi 1990. un 2000. gadā. (1 or 4.2%)
Max Hg 2007: 0,045. Cd 2001: 0,14. Cu 2008: 11,28. Min Cd 1996., 1999., 2005. : 1 (1 or 4.2%)
Max kopējais antropogēni emitētā svina apjoms 49 tonnas (1991.), min- 5,2 tonnas (2004.). Max Hg emisijas apjoms 0,24 tonnas (1990. ) min- 0,6 tonnas (2000.2002., 2003.2004. ). Max kop. antrop. emitētā Cd 0,32 tonnas (1990.), min-0,19 tonnas (1995,2000) (1 or 4.2%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (19 or 79.2%)
Visbiežāk naftas noplūžu apjomi bijuši nelieli – mazāk par 0,1 m3, taču tika reģistrētas arī lielākas noplūdes 0,1-1 m3. (1 or 4.2%)
1 (1 or 3.0%)
2 (1 or 3.0%)
240 (1 or 3.0%)
3 (1 or 3.0%)
4 (1 or 3.0%)
75-100% (1 or 3.0%)
99 (1 or 3.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (20 or 60.6%)
lessthan1% (6 or 18.2%)
0 (2 or 6.1%)
23,9 (1 or 3.0%)
5-25% (3 or 9.1%)
7,6 (1 or 3.0%)
75-100% (1 or 3.0%)
Ableitung mit der Fortluft: Schwebstoffe (2009): 1,0 E+07 Bq; Tritium 1,2 E+08 Bq (1 or 3.0%)
Alle Eintragspfade: Periode: 2003-2005; Cadmium 0,5 t/a, Blei 10 t/a, Cu 20t/a (1 or 3.0%)
Datenlage unzureichend für Einträge durch die Schifffahrt und Offshoreaktivität (2 or 6.1%)
Einträge für alle Pfade: Periode: 2003-2005; Cadmium 0,5 t/a, Blei 10 t/a, Cu 20t/a (1 or 3.0%)
Fish (3 or 9.1%)
Muschelgewässerrichtlinie erfüllt (1 or 3.0%)
Tritium (2009): 1,9 E+08 Bq, Spalt- und Aktivierungsprod.:,= E+07 Bq; , Alphastrahler 1,2 E+05 Bq (1 or 3.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (15 or 45.5%)
75-100% (2 or 9.5%)
NotReported (2 or 9.5%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (16 or 76.2%)
lessthan1% (1 or 4.8%)
 Ca 2 % (1 or 3.0%)
75-100% (1 or 3.0%)
Cd: 3.184
Cu: 128.026
Ni: 75.058
Pb: 63.672
Zn: 702.495
Hg: 0.61 (1 or 3.0%)
Not assessed (10 or 30.3%)
Not reported (6 or 18.2%)
NotReported (8 or 24.2%)
Unknown (1 or 3.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (5 or 15.2%)
Assessment trend (status) No. of criteria assessments per category
Unknown_NotAssessed (6 or 100.0%)
Stable (4 or 23.5%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (13 or 76.5%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (15 or 100.0%)
Declining (3 or 13.6%)
Improving (5 or 22.7%)
Stable (2 or 9.1%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (12 or 54.5%)
Stable (3 or 18.8%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (13 or 81.2%)
Declining (1 or 25.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (3 or 75.0%)
Improving (3 or 17.6%)
Stable (1 or 5.9%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (13 or 76.5%)
Criteria status No. of criteria assessments per category
Good (1 or 16.7%)
NotAssessed (3 or 50.0%)
NotGood (2 or 33.3%)
Good (4 or 23.5%)
NotAssessed (13 or 76.5%)
Good (1 or 6.7%)
NotAssessed (14 or 93.3%)
Good (6 or 27.3%)
NotAssessed (3 or 13.6%)
NotGood (13 or 59.1%)
Descriptive (2 or 10.5%)
Good (2 or 10.5%)
NotAssessed (8 or 42.1%)
NotGood (2 or 10.5%)
OtherStatus (5 or 26.3%)
Descriptive (1 or 16.7%)
NotAssessed (3 or 50.0%)
NotGood (2 or 33.3%)
Description (14 or 82.4%)
NotAssessed (1 or 5.9%)
NotGood (1 or 5.9%)
OtherStatus (1 or 5.9%)
Assessment period
2004 - 2011
2008 - 2011
2004 - 2009
Related activities
AgricultForestry, NotReported, Shipping, Urban
Industry, NotReported, Shipping, Urban
Industry, NotReported, Urban
AgricultForestry, Dredging, NotReported, Ports, Shipping, SolidWasteDisposal, TourismRecreation, Urban, UsesActivitiesOther
ActivitiesUsesAll, AgricultForestry, Industry, Shipping, Urban, UsesActivitiesOther
AgricultForestry, CablesPipelines, Industry, NotReported, Ports, Shipping, Urban
AgricultForestry, Industry, NotReported, Shipping, Urban