Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D2 / Black Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D2 Non-indigenous species |
Region/subregion | Black Sea |
Reported by | Member state |
Member state | Bulgaria |
Romania |
|
---|---|---|---|
Member state report | |||
Marine reporting units | MRUs used |
|
|
Features | Biological |
|
|
Features | No theme |
|
|
Element | All marine ecosystem elements |
|
|
Element | Codonellopsis morchella |
|
|
Element | Eutintinnus pectinis |
|
|
Element | Mnemiopsis leidyi |
|
|
Element | Not applicable |
|
|
Element | Salpingella decurtata |
|
|
Element | Tintinnopsis tocantinensis |
|
|
Element2 | |||
Element sources | No. of elements per level |
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D2 Non-indigenous species | ||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D2C1 Newly-introduced NIS |
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D2C2 Established NIS (2.1, 2.1.1) |
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D2C3 Adverse effects of NIS (2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2) |
|
|
Threshold values | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 92% (26) |
33% (3) |
Threshold value sources | D2 Non-indigenous species | ||
Threshold value sources | D2C1 Newly-introduced NIS |
|
|
Threshold value sources | D2C2 Established NIS (2.1, 2.1.1) |
|
|
Threshold value sources | D2C3 Adverse effects of NIS (2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2) |
|
|
Value achieved upper | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 17% (5) |
100% (9) |
Value achieved lower | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D2 Non-indigenous species | ||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D2C1 Newly-introduced NIS |
|
|
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D2C2 Established NIS (2.1, 2.1.1) |
|
|
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D2C3 Adverse effects of NIS (2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2) |
|
|
Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 90-90% (14 of 28 parameters) |
|
Proportion values achieved | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 93-100% (8 of 28 parameters) |
|
Proportion threshold value units | % area of MRU achieving threshold value |
||
Trends | No. of trends per category |
|
|
Parameters achieved | No. of parameters per category |
|
|
Related indicators |
|
||
Criteria status | No. of criteria per category |
|
|
Element status | No. of elements per category |
|
|
Integration rule type for parameters | |||
Integration rule description for parameters | |||
Integration rule type for criteria | |||
Integration rule description for criteria | |||
GES extent threshold | |||
GES extent achieved |
|
||
GES extent unit |
|
|
|
GES achieved | All marine ecosystem elements |
|
|
GES achieved | Established non-indigenous species |
|
|
GES achieved | Newly-introduced non-indigenous species |
|
|
Assessment period | 2012-2017 (28 or 100.0%) |
2012-2017 (9 or 100.0%) |
|
Related pressures |
|
||
Related targets | 4 |