Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D6 / Black Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
| Region/subregion | Black Sea |
| Reported by | Member state |
| Member state | BG |
RO |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Marine reporting units | Number used | 12 |
3 |
| Features | No theme | Condition (4) Distribution (4) Extent (4) HabitatOverall (4) ImpactPressureExploitedFish (1) ImpactPressureExploitedShellfish (1) ImpactPressureExploitedSpecies (3) ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (4) ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (4) ImpactsPressureSeabedHabitats (2) LevelPressure (2) LevelPressureFishingOther (1) LevelPressureFishingRecreational (1) LevelPressureLess12PassiveMobile (1) LevelPressureMore12MobileOther (1) LevelPressureMore12MobileSeabed (1) LevelPressureMore12Passive (1) LevelPressureOther (3) LevelPressureShellfishCollection (1) |
|
| Elements | Predominant habitats | LitSed (2) |
|
| Elements | No theme | NotRelevant (12) |
|
| Elements | Functional group | FishCoastal (1) |
|
| Criteria used | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats | ||
| Criteria used | D6C1 Physical loss of the seabed (6.1) | 6.1 |
|
| Criteria used | D6C2 Physical disturbance to the seabed (6.1) | 6.1 |
|
| Criteria used | D6C3 Adverse effects from physical disturbance (6.1.2) | ||
| Criteria used | D6C4 Benthic habitat extent (1.4, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.5, 1.5.1, 6.1.1) | 1.5.1, 1.4.1, 6.1.1 |
|
| Criteria used | D6C5 Benthic habitat condition (1.6, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.6.3, 6.2, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4) | 6.2, 1.6.1, 6.2.2 |
|
| Threshold values | % of indicators with values (no. of indicators reported) | 0.0% (0) |
40.0% (10) |
| Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of indicators reported) | 100 - 100 (3) |
|
| Baseline | No. of indicators reported per response | We took into account the baseline from 1960s for the habitat 1110-3b (1) We took into account the baseline from 1960s for the habitat 1170-10 (1) the baseline is the current density of Donax trunculus in the protected site (1) the baseline is the present extent of the habitat in Romania (1) the baseline is the present extent of the habitat in unaltered state in Romania (1) the current density of Pholas dactylus as recorded in Micu, 2007 (1) |
|
| Proportion values achieved | No. of criteria reported per category | 1-5% (1 or 2.7%) 25-50% (1 or 2.7%) 5-25% (2 or 5.4%) Altered (8 or 21.6%) InLine (3 or 8.1%) Unknown_NotAssessed (22 or 59.5%) |
|
| Assessment trend (status) | No. of criteria assessments per category | Declining (1 or 4.8%) Improving (1 or 4.8%) Stable (14 or 66.7%) Unknown_NotAssessed (5 or 23.8%) |
|
| Criteria status | No. of criteria assessments per category | Descriptive (8 or 38.1%) Good (8 or 38.1%) NotAssessed (5 or 23.8%) |
|
| Assessment period | 2003 - 2011 2005 - 2011 |
||
| Related activities | Dredging, Fisheries, LandClaimDefence, NotReported, Ports |