Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D1-B / Mediterranean
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Birds |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean |
| Reported by | Member state |
| Member state | United Kingdom |
Spain |
France |
Italy |
Malta |
Slovenia |
Croatia |
Greece |
Cyprus |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Member state report | ||||||||||
| Marine reporting units | MRUs used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species | All birds |
|
|
|
||||||
| Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species | Benthic-feeding birds |
|
||||||||
| Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species | Grazing birds |
|
||||||||
| Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species | Pelagic-feeding birds |
|
|
|
||||||
| Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species | Surface-feeding birds |
|
|
|
||||||
| Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species | Wading birds |
|
||||||||
| GES description | D1 Birds |
D1C1: The levels of incidental catches should be anecdotal or not visible and in no case should negatively affect the population dynamics of the species concerned, taking into account the cumulative impact of all forms of fishing, periods and regions.
D1C2: If the present population (threshold value) is found above 80Â % of its reference value in species that are single-egg, or 70Â % in species that make more than one egg, the BEA is reached. D1C3: Demographic characteristics of the population do not endanger its long-term viability, so that the reproductive parameters and adult survival values are indicated. D1C4: No colonies/breeding units of the evaluated species are lost. D1C5: This criterion has not been considered for the birds group because of the difficulty to properly assess the habitat of the different species assessed and to establish reference values. |
Biological diversity is conserved. The quality of habitats and their number, as well as the distribution and abundance of species are adapted to existing physiographic, geographic and climatic conditions (Directive 2008/56/EC).
|
The marine environment of Cyprus is considered to be in good environmental status by the year 2020 if biological diversity is maintained. The quality and occurrence of habitats and the distribution and abundance of species are in line with prevailing physiographic, geographic and climatic conditions. |
||||||
| GES description | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
G 1.1 Marine species listed in the Habitats Directive, the Birds Directive and the SPA/BD Protocol to the Barcelona Convention maintain or attain favourable conservation status
|
Levels of incidental by-catch of marine reptiles, marine mammals and seabirds do not result in declines in the population abundance of the representative species. |
The mortality rate per species from incidental by-catch is below levels which threaten the species, such that its long- term viability is ensured. |
||||||
| GES description | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
G 1.1 Marine species listed in the Habitats Directive, the Birds Directive and the SPA/BD Protocol to the Barcelona Convention maintain or attain favourable conservation status
|
The population trend in terms of the abundance of breeding seabirds, measured in breeding pairs over a 12-year time period, is stable and not decreasing, taking into consideration natural variation. |
The population abundance of the species is not adversely affected due to anthropogenic pressures, such that its long-term viability is ensured. |
||||||
| GES description | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) | Breeding success and survival rates, as relevant for breeding seabirds, are not deviating from normal. |
The population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity, and survival rates) of the species are indicative of a healthy population which is not adversely affected due to anthropogenic pressures. |
|||||||
| GES description | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) | The breeding distribution of seabird populations shows stable or increasing trends over a twelve year period. |
The species distributional range and, where relevant, pattern is in line with prevailing physiographic, geographic and climatic conditions. |
|||||||
| GES description | D1C5 Habitat for the species | The habitat for the species has the necessary extent and condition to support the different stages in the life history of the species. |
||||||||
| Determination date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| Update type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| Justification for non-use of criterion | D1C1: [CoastalFish]: Criterion D1C1 not used, since not relevant for this species group, composed by selected species belonging to fish coastal communities of hard substrates, not subject to catches from industrial fisheries. No MS was informed about. D1C4: [Mammals and Reptiles]: Criterion D1C4 is considered irrelevant for the definition of GES of wideranging species such as cetaceans and marine turtles since their migratory nature leads to wide species home ranges whose eventual contraction cannot be detected in time periods relevant to identify trends D1C5: [Mammals and Reptiles]: Criterion D1C5 is difficult to assess given the species' migratory nature and wide home ranges. No MS was informed about. |
D1C1: Updated GES is not targeting non-commercial species of fish and cephalopods as per Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848, pending more data on by-catch as per Malta’s Work Plan for data collection in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors 2017-2019. D1C3: GES has been elaborated in relation to D1C3 for commercial cephalopods as follows: “The size distribution of commercially exploited species of fish and cephalopods, in comparison with long-term historical average, is indicative of healthy stocks. D1C4: GES in relation to D1C4 was only elaborated for marine reptiles and marine mammals as follows: “The distributional range of marine reptiles and marine mammals as listed in Annex IV to Directive 92/43/EEC is stable and not declining taking into consideration natural variation, and not smaller than Favourable Reference Range values where established under Directive 92/43/EEC”. This GES is not elaborated for fish species, since none of the species under consideration are listed in the Habitats Directive. D1C5: GES in relation to D1C5 has not been elaborated for marine mammals since the interaction of marine mammals with Maltese waters needs to be better defined. As indicated in D1C4, none of the fish species under consideration are listed in the Habitats Directive. |
D1: The GES definition is placed at the descriptor level according to the data currently available for the assessment of the situation and as such is fully relevant for specific groups of species.
|
D1C1: None
|
||||||
| Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements |
D1.1: Criterion D1C1 could not be filled in for any seabird species during this assessment mainly due to the lack of data. The status of criterion D1C2 could not be reported during this assessment despite the use of OSPAR indicator B1. Indeed, methodological developments (protocols, thresholds, indicators) and the acquisition of additional data are necessary to be able to conclude on the status of criterion D1C2 for each species considered. The methodological standards relating to criteria D1C1 and D1C2 for seabird species will therefore be specified following further studies, as provided for in Ministerial Order 2019 on the definition of good environmental status of marine waters.
|
D1.1: Data for birds is available for Descriptor to be assessed. D1C2: [ No CY indicators ] |