Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-C / Mediterranean
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Cephalopods |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean |
Reported by | Member state |
Member state | United Kingdom |
Spain |
France |
Italy |
Malta |
Slovenia |
Croatia |
Greece |
Cyprus |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Member state report | ||||||||||
Marine reporting units | MRUs used |
|
|
|
||||||
Features | Species |
|
|
|
||||||
Element | Alloteuthis spp. |
|
||||||||
Element | Eledone cirrhosa |
|
|
|||||||
Element | Eledone moschata |
|
|
|
||||||
Element | Illex coindetii |
|
||||||||
Element | Loligo vulgaris |
|
|
|||||||
Element | Octopus vulgaris |
|
||||||||
Element | Scaeurgus unicirrhus |
|
||||||||
Element | Sepia officinalis |
|
|
|||||||
Element | Sepia orbignyana |
|
||||||||
Element | Todarodes sagittatus |
|
||||||||
Element2 | ||||||||||
Element sources | No. of elements per level |
|
|
|
||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1 Cephalopods | |||||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
||||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
||||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
||||||||
Threshold values | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
0% (0) |
|||||||
Threshold value sources | D1 Cephalopods | |||||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch | |||||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) | |||||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) | |||||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) | |||||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C5 Habitat for the species | |||||||||
Value achieved upper | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
0% (0) |
|||||||
Value achieved lower | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
0% (0) |
|||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1 Cephalopods | |||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch | |||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) | |||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) | |||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) | |||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C5 Habitat for the species | |||||||||
Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 100-100% (25 of 25 parameters) |
||||||||
Proportion values achieved | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 1-1% (3 of 25 parameters) |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value units | ||||||||||
Trends | No. of trends per category |
|
|
|||||||
Parameters achieved | No. of parameters per category |
|
|
|||||||
Related indicators |
|
|||||||||
Criteria status | No. of criteria per category |
|
|
|
||||||
Element status | No. of elements per category |
|
|
|
||||||
Integration rule type for parameters | Not relevant (8 or 100.0%) |
|||||||||
Integration rule description for parameters | ||||||||||
Integration rule type for criteria | OOAO (20 or 100.0%) |
|||||||||
Integration rule description for criteria | under development |
The integration method used for the criteria was the following: If 2/3 criteria assessed were ‘good’, the overall status of the species was determined to be ‘good’; if two criteria were assessed and one was determined to be ‘good’ and the other as ‘not good’, the overall status of the species was determined to be as ‘not assessed’; if 2/3 criteria assessed were ‘not good’, the overall status of the species was determined to be ‘not good’. In accordance with the ‘Guidance for Assessments Under Article 8 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive’ integration at species level shall be agreed at Union level taking into account regional or subregional specificities; however, since the majority of the species were found to be in ‘not good’ status, on the basis of expert judgement, GES for both fish and cephalopods is expected to be achieved later than 2020. |
||||||||
GES extent threshold | ||||||||||
GES extent achieved | ||||||||||
GES extent unit | ||||||||||
GES achieved | Coastal/shelf cephalopods |
|
|
|
||||||
GES achieved | Deep-sea cephalopods |
|
||||||||
Assessment period | 2012-2017 (20 or 100.0%) |
2012-2018 (25 or 100.0%) |
2012-2017 (8 or 100.0%) |
|||||||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|||||||
Related targets | 1 |
1 |
1 |