Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D8 / Mediterranean

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D8 Contaminants
Region/subregion Mediterranean
Reported by Member state
Member state
United Kingdom
Spain
France
Italy
Malta
Slovenia
Croatia
Greece
Cyprus
Member state report
Marine reporting units MRUs used
  • MWE-ES-SD-ESAL
  • MWE-ES-SD-LEV
  • MWE-FR-MS-MO-ZC12M
  • MWE-FR-MS-MO-ZL12M
  • IT-AS-0001
  • IT-ISCMS-0001
  • IT-WMS-0001
  • MIC-MT-MS-02
  • MIC-MT-TeW-01
  • MAD-SI-MRU-1
  • MAD-SI-MRU-11
  • MAD-SI-MRU-12
  • MAD-HR-MRU_1
  • MAL-CY-MS
Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Species Marine species
  • D8C2 (1)
Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Habitats Benthic habitats
  • D8 (1)
  • D8C2 (1)
Anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment: Substances, litter and energy Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • D8 (1)
  • D8C1 (1)
  • D8C3 (1)
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Chemical Acute pollution events
  • D8 (2)
  • D8C3 (3)
  • D8C3 (1)
  • D8 (3)
  • D8 (1)
  • D8C3 (1)
  • D8C3 (1)
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Chemical Contaminants - non UPBT substances
  • D8 (2)
  • D8C1 (2)
  • D8C1 (3)
  • D8C2 (3)
  • D8C1 (3)
  • D8C2 (1)
  • D8 (3)
  • D8 (1)
  • D8C1 (1)
  • D8 (1)
  • D8C2 (1)
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Chemical Contaminants - in seafood
  • D8C2 (1)
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Chemical Contaminants - UPBT substances
  • D8 (2)
  • D8C1 (2)
  • D8C1 (3)
  • D8C2 (3)
  • D8C1 (3)
  • D8C2 (1)
  • D8 (3)
  • D8 (1)
  • D8C1 (1)
  • D8 (1)
  • D8C2 (1)
GES description D8 Contaminants
An area presented an environmental state if it does not exceed the established levels of pollutants by the competent authorities and regional bodies on a large majority of their samples and when the time trends are decreasing or remaining stable (in those cases where the levels detected are close to the base value). The threshold selected for deciding whether a site or region complies with GES is that 95 % of the evaluated indicators are below T1 (EACs, ECS, ERLs). Values above T1 mean that the concentration of the dangerous substance may pose a risk to the environment and the species present there.
Good status of the marine environment is achieved when the concentrations of pollutants in the sea are at such a level as not to cause adverse effects on organisms, populations, communities or ecosystems. Good status of the marine environment for pollution by pollutants is achieved when limit values, which also represent objectives, are met.
Concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.
The marine environment of Cyprus is considered to be in good environmental status by the year 2020 if the concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects..
GES description D8C1 Contaminants in environment (8.1, 8.1.1)
Contaminant concentrations do not exceed threshold values (Decision 2017/848/EU).
G 8.1 Concentrations, for each of the categories of contaminants regulated by the relevant legislation, and
international obligations, with the exception of radionuclides, are lower, in indexed and integrated form
by category of contaminants, the environmental quality standards laid down.
Concentration of contaminants in the water column and biota, within territorial waters, do not exceed the relevant Environmental Quality Standards (EQSs) set through Directive 2013/39/EU.


Trends in the concentration of contaminants in sediment and biota (as relevant), within territorial waters, are stable or decreasing throughout the 6-year assessment period.


Trends in the concentration of contaminants in water, sediment and biota in marine areas beyond territorial waters, are stable or declining throughout the 6-year assessment period, and, where relevant, are in line with Environmental Assessment Criteria that may be set by UNEP/MAP’s Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Plan (IMAP).
The chemical status of the water body in relation to the priority (hazardous) substances and specific pollutants is defined as good when:
- the average annual concentration of each of the monitored contaminants in water meets the environmental quality standard expressed as annual average value (EQS-AA).
- the maximum measured concentration of each of the monitored contaminants in water meets the environmental quality standard expressed as a maximum allowable concentration (EQS-MAC).
- concentration of each of the monitored contaminants in biota meets the environmental quality standard set for biota (EQS biota).
GES description D8C2 Adverse effects of contaminants (8.2, 8.2.1)
G 8.2 For each of the categories of contaminants regulated by the relevant legislation and obligations
international, with the exception of radionuclides, variations in biological effects are not
significant in relation to their respective controls and thresholds.
Concentrations of contaminants in biota are not giving rise to adverse health effects on species or habitats.
Threshold values for adverse effects (including cumulative and synergistic effects) on the health of species and the condition of habitats, are set on the national level. GES is achieved when each of the evaluated contaminant effects meets the set threshold values.
Analyses of contaminants in wild fish populations (D9) have repeatedly recorded low contaminant levels relative to reported/instituted standards. Contaminant concentrations in top predators have not been reported to this date.
GES description D8C3 Significant acute pollution events (8.2.2)
G 8.3 Major pollution events are prevented and their possible impacts minimised.
The spatial and temporal extent of marine areas affected by acute pollution events is stable or decreasing throughout the 6-year assessment period.
There is not yet an agreed definition of "significant acute pollution events" or relevant threshold levels on the EU or the national level, therefore, GES can not be evaluated based on this criteria.
No significant acute pollution events have been reported for the period 2012-2019.
GES description D8C4 Adverse effects of significant pollution events (8.2.2)
Determination date
  • 2019-06 (D8)
  • 2019-10 (D8C1)
  • 2018-12 (D8C2, D8C3, D8C1)
  • 2019-12 (D8C2, D8C3, D8C1)
  • 2019-08 (D8)
  • 2019-06 (D8C2, D8C3, D8, D8C1)
  • 2013-04 (D8C2, D8C3, D8)
Update type
  • Same as last reported determination (D8)
  • New determination (D8C1)
  • Same as last reported determination (D8C2, D8C3, D8C1)
  • Modified from reported determination (D8C2, D8C3, D8C1)
  • Modified from reported determination (D8)
  • Modified from reported determination (D8C2, D8C3, D8, D8C1)
  • Same as last reported determination (D8C2, D8C3, D8)
Justification for non-use of criterion
D8: justification of non use other substances Cyprus does not have sources of contamination in general since there are no heavy industry installations onshore and there are no river inputs due to the decision of the State to construct dams and intercept all waterways to the sea. In this way, the possible input of contaminants is minimized to the two main ports of Cyprus, Lemesos and Vasilikos. In this context Cyprus decided in the beginning of WFD to monitor contaminants in seawater in these two areas of interest, while monitoring in biota was conducted in more areas. Also, sediment monitoring has been conducted for the last years. The number of contaminants measured in all matrices are dependent on local resources and available analytical technology. Cyprus, has not been able to fully develop the desired technology at once but is intending to do so to fully implement 2017/848.
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements
D8: The definition of GES does not change. However, its definition in the next evaluations should take into account a larger number of pollutants of a persistent, emerging type, etc. They can damage the environment and therefore influence the GES. The improvement of monitoring programmes and the increase in pollutants measured will lead to an improvement in the evaluation of GES.
D8C1: Criterion D8C1 could only be partially assessed for all contaminants in this evaluation due primarily to the lack of an aggregation (threshold) rule at the individual parameter level or a rule for integrating parameters at the criterion level. Indeed, the assessment of the state of each contaminant is carried out at the level of the elementary unit of assessment of the parameter, without aggregation at the MRU level. However, the assessment allows the identification of (i) problematic substances in order to direct efforts towards potential sources and (ii) areas where actions need to be implemented to return to or maintain good status. The methodological standards relating to this criterion will be specified following further studies, as provided for in Ministerial Order 2019 on the definition of good environmental status of marine waters.



D8C3: Criterion D8C3 (duration and spatial extent of acute pollution events) could not be filled in for this assessment. Indeed, data from accidental pollution reports (POLREPs) could not be collected and the information associated with the POLREPs does not allow a robust assessment of this criterion to be proposed. The methodological standards for this criterion will be specified following further studies, as provided for in the Ministerial Order 2019 on the definition of good environmental status of marine waters.
D8C3: There is not yet an agreed definition of "significant acute pollution events" or relevant threshold levels on the EU or the national level, therefore, GES can not be evaluated based on this criteria.
D8: None