Member State report / Art11 / 2014 / D6 / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2014-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | Belgium |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Reporter not found |
Report date | Date not found |
Report access |
Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name | MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
---|---|---|
Reference existing programme | ||
Marine Unit ID | ||
Q4e - Programme ID | ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed habitats |
|
Q4f - Programme description | The Belgian MSFD monitoring programme ‘Biodiversity - seabed habitats’ aims at assessing the following ETs:
• ET7 : The spatial extent and distribution of the EUNIS level 3 habitats (sandy mud to mud, muddy sands to sands and coarse grained sediments), as well as that of gravel beds fluctuate - relative to the reference state as described in Initial Assessment - within a margin limited to the accuracy of the current distribution maps
• ET10: The Ecological Quality Ratio as determined by BEQI, indicative for benthic ecosystem structure and quality, has a minimum value of 0,60 in each of the habitat types
• ET11: Positive trend in median adult density (or frequency of occurrence) of at least one species within the long-lived and/or slowly reproducing and key engineering benthic species groups in both mud to muddy sands and pure fine to coarse sands
• ET12: Spring median benthic bioturbation potential (BPc) in the Abra alba habitat type is higher than 100
• ET13: Positive trend in median colony/body size of the sessile, long-lived and/or larger benthic species Buccinum undatum, Mytilus edulis, Flustra foliacea, Haliclona oculata and Alcyonium digitatum
• ET14 – Positive trend in frequency of occurrence and median adult density of at least half of the key and long-lived species Ostrea edulis, Sabellaria spinulosa, Mytilus edulis, Buccinum undatum, Haliclona oculata, Alcyonium digitatum and Alcyonidium spp
• ET15 – No loss or positive trend in species richness within all key hard substrate taxa, i.e. Porifera, Cnidaria, Bryozoa, Polychaeta, Malacostraca, Maxillopoda, Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Echinodermata and Ascidiacea
• ET16 – Decreasing relative frequency of occurrence of damaged Asterias rubens (2+ cm arm length) and tube clusters of Pomatoceros triqueter, indicative for physical disturbance of the bottom (= pressure indicator), as to enhance natural development of the gravel bed ecosystem (= desired state)
• ET17: For each of the scavenging seabirds species, are the mean densities over 5 consecutive years not below the minimum defined by the Birds Directive favourable conservation status
Six sub-programmes can be discerned:
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP5 (delivering data to assess ET7), targeting a full-coverage seabed and transect seabed mapping of selected areas at EUNIS level 3;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP6 (delivering data to assess ET10), targeting the quantification of a composite index based on density, biomass, species richness and species composition of the macrobenthos at selected stations in the BPNS;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP7 (delivering data to assess ET11), targeting the quantification of long-lived and key engineering benthic species density at selected stations in the BPNS;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP8 (delivering data to assess ET12), targeting the quantification of the macrobenthic community bioturbation potential at selected stations in the BPNS;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP9 (delivering data to assess ET13 to 16), targeting body/colony size of characteristic hard substrate species, frequency of occurrence and densities in a non-bottom fisheries-impacted, a low impacted and regular fisheries-impacted area;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP10 (delivering data to assess ET17), targeting multibeam bathymetry and backscatter measurements in combination with visual observations and seabed sampling in a gravel bed in the Hinder Banks region and a gravel bed in the Flemish Banks region |
|
Q5e - Natural variability |
|
|
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data | N |
Q5d - Established methods | Y |
|
Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
|
Q5d - Adequate capacity | Y |
|
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | ||
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | By2018 |
|
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment | A research proposal has been submitted to the Belgian Science Policy Office to strengthen capacity to develop improved methods and strategies for the acoustic mapping of seabed/habitat types in a monitoring context, hence emphasising on quantifying uncertainties in the mapping process needed for accurate change detection |
|
Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target | Target 7 Target 10 Target 11 Target 12 Target 13 Target 14 Target 15 Target 16 Target 17 |
Q6a - Associated indicator | Target 7 Target 10 Target 11 Target 12 Target 13 Target 14 Target 15 Target 16 Target 17 |
|
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData | Y |
Q6b_EstablishedMethods | N |
|
Q6d_AdequateCapacity | N |
|
Q6c - Target updating | N |
|
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment |
N.A.
|
|
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | By2018 |
|
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment | A research proposal has been submitted to the Belgian Science Policy Office to strengthen capacity to develop improved methods and strategies for the acoustic mapping of seabed/habitat types in a monitoring context, hence emphasising on quantifying uncertainties in the mapping process needed for accurate change detection |
|
Q7a - Relevant activities | ||
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | ||
Q7c - Relevant measures | ||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data | |
Q7d - Established methods | ||
Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES | ||
Q7d - Adequate capacity | ||
Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures | ||
Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures | ||
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | ||
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | By2014 |
|
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes |
|
|
Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID | |
Sub-programme name | Seabed habitats - distribution and extent |
|
Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID | |
Sub-programme name | Seabed habitats - distribution and extent |
|
Q4k - Monitoring purpose | ||
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | ||
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats | |
Q5c - Species list | ||
Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
|
|
Q5c - Pressures | ||
Q9a - Elements | ||
Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
|
Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
|
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution | |
Species population size | ||
Species population characteristics | ||
Species impacts | ||
Habitat distribution | ||
Habitat extent | ||
Habitat condition (physical-chemical) | ||
Habitat condition (biological) | ||
Habitat impacts | ||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input | |
Pressure output | ||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity | |
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other | |
Q41 Spatial scope | ||
Q4j - Description of spatial scope | ||
Marine Unit IDs |
|
|
Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date | - |
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | ||
Q9c - Monitoring method | ||
Q9d - Description of alteration to method | ||
Q9e - Quality assurance | ||
Q9f - Quality control | ||
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % | |
Q9g - No. of samples | ||
Q9i - Description of sample representivity | ||
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | ||
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | ||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type | |
Q10c - Data access mechanism | ||
Q10c - Data access rights | ||
Q10c - INSPIRE standard | ||
Q10c Date data are available | ||
Q10c - Data update frequency | ||
Q10d - Description of data access |