Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-M / Bulgaria / Black Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Member State | Bulgaria |
Region/subregion | Black Sea |
Reported by | Ministry of Environment and Water |
Report date | 2022-03-29 |
Report access | BG_ART8_GES.xml |
Bulgarian part of Black sea (BLK-BG-MS-1)
GES component |
D1-M
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Small toothed cetaceans
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Element |
Delphinus delphis |
Phocoena phocoena |
Tursiops truncatus |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Element code |
137094 |
137117 |
137111 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
|||||||||
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Other
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Other
|
||||||||||
Parameter other |
Density
|
Density
|
Density
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
5019.0 |
23580.0 |
0.718 |
0.835 |
1003.0 |
9960.0 |
0.144 |
0.353 |
4861.0 |
10162.0 |
0.36 |
0.696 |
||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
5019.0 |
23580.0 |
0.718 |
0.835 |
6474.0 |
9960.0 |
11100.0 |
0.535 |
0.353 |
4861.0 |
10162.0 |
5400.0 |
0.36 |
0.696 |
||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
963.0 |
0.0796 |
1003.0 |
2145.09 |
0.144 |
1363.0 |
745.81 |
0.1129 |
||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
(number of) individuals
|
Other
|
Other
|
(number of) individuals
|
Other
|
(number of) individuals
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
number
|
square kilometer
|
number of individuals per square kilometer
|
number of individuals pre square kilometer
|
numbers
|
Square kilometers
|
number of individuals per square kilometer
|
Square kilometers
|
Number of individuals per square kilometer
|
number of individuals per square kilometer
|
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
||||||
Description parameter |
Not assessed and lack of threshold values.
|
Assessment is based on vessel survey data and thresholds. |
Assessment is based on aerial survey data and thresholds. |
Not assessed due to lack of thresholds.
|
Assessment is based on vessel survey data and thresholds. |
Assessment is based on aerial survey data and thresholds. |
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
The assessment is based on vessel survey data and thresholds. |
The assessment is based on aerial survey data and thresholds. |
Not assessed due to lack of thresholds.
|
The assessment is based on vessel survey data and thresholds. |
The assessment is based on aerial survey data and thresholds. |
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
Not assessed due to lack of data and threshold values. |
The assessment is based on vessel survey data and thresholds. |
The assessment is based on aerial survey data and thresholds. |
Not assessed due to lack of thresholds.
|
The assessment is based on aerial survey data and thresholds. |
The assessment is based on vessel survey data and thresholds. |
|||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
|||||||||
Description criteria |
Not assessed due to lack of data.
|
The estimates based on vessel surveys show "Not good" status, although the estimates from aerial surveys show "Good" status. The overall assessment of the criteria is "Not good". |
Not assessed
|
Estimates from vessel surveys are below the threshold and the status is "Not good", although the results from aerial surveys show "Good" status. The overall assessment under the criteria is "Not good" status. |
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
The estimates from vessel and aerial surveys show "Good" status. The overall assessment of the criteria is "Good" status. |
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
The estimates from vessel and aerial surveys show "Good" status. The overall assessment of the criteria is "Good" status. |
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
The estimates from vessel surveys show "Not good" status and the estimates from aerial surveys - "Good" status. The overall assessment of the criteria is "Not good". |
Not assessed due to lack of data and thresholds.
|
The estimates from vessel surveys show "Not good" status and the estimates from aerial surveys - "Good" status. The overall assessment of the criteria is "Not good". |
Not assessed due lack of data and thresholds.
|
|||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Description element |
The D.d.ponticus is in "Not good" status according to criteria D1C2 and D1C4. |
The species is in "Good" status.
|
The species is in "Not good" status.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
The integration of the individual indicators by species under each criterion is carried out according to the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)" . |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
The integration of the individual criteria follows the rule "One Out All Out (OAAO)" . |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
33.33 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Description overall status |
The results show that only the species P.p. relicta is in "Good" status. The rest of the two species D.d.ponticus and T.t.ponticus are in "Not good" status. The overall status assessment of the functional group of marine mammals is "Not in GES" and GES is not achieved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Related targets |
|