MS/Art8/2018/D8/Bulgaria/Black Sea — Marine Information System for Europe

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D8 / Bulgaria / Black Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D8 Contaminants
Member State	Bulgaria
Region/subregion	Black Sea
Reported by	Ministry of Environment and Water
Report date	2022-03-29
Report access	BG_ART8_GES.xml

Emine-Sozopol (BLK-BG-AA-EmineMaslennos)

Simplified table

GES component	D8
Feature	Contaminants - non UPBT substances																														Contaminants - UPBT substances
Element	Aluminium and its compounds		Anthracene	Arsenic and its compounds	Atrazine	Bisphenol A	Cadmium and its compounds		Copper and its compounds		Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)	Fluoranthene			Hexachlorobenzene			Hexachlorobutadiene		Lead and its compounds		Naphthalene	Nickel and its compounds		Octylphenol (4-(1,1',3,3'-tetramethylbutyl)-phenol)	Pentachlorobenzene	Polychlorinated biphenyls (7 PCB: 28,52,101,118,138,153,180)	Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')	Uranium	Zinc and its compounds	Benzo(a)pyrene			Brominated diphenylethers (congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154)		Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs)	Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide	Mercury and its compounds			Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene			Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene		Tributyltin compounds
Element code	CAS_7429-90-5		CAS_120-12-7	CAS_7440-38-2	CAS_1912-24-9	CAS_80-05-7	CAS_7440-43-9		CAS_7440-50-8		CAS_117-81-7	CAS_206-44-0			CAS_118-74-1			CAS_87-68-3		CAS_7439-92-1		CAS_91-20-3	CAS_7440-02-0		CAS_140-66-9	CAS_608-93-5	EEA_33-38-5	EEA_32-03-1	CAS_7440-61-1	CAS_7440-66-6	CAS_50-32-8			EEA_32-04-2		EEA_33-58-9	EEA_33-50-1	CAS_7439-97-6			SUMBK			SUMBI		TBTIN
Element code source	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Undefined			Undefined		ICES
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU		EU		EU	EU			EU			EU		EU		EU	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU			EU		EU	EU	EU			EU			EU		EU
Criterion	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1
Parameter	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water
Parameter other
Threshold value upper		10.0	0.1	10.0	0.6	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0		0.05	55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	5.0	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085		0.0065	0.0067	20.0		0.07	0.017		0.017		0.00082			0.0002
Threshold value lower		10.0	0.1	10.0	0.6	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0			55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	5.0	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085		0.0065	0.0067	20.0			0.017							0.0002
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)			Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)			Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	47800.0	5.63	0.005	1.61	0.016	0.07	0.25	0.749	66.9	1.92	0.392	0.88	0.03	0.0036	1.0	0.0005	0.005	2.5	0.025	29.9	1.81	0.019	42.2	2.467	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	1.937	5.77	0.1	0.01	2.5e-05	0.143	0.0014	0.0023	1.095	105.4	0.05	0.2098	0.25	0.03	0.005	0.03	0.0025	1.1	0.0013	0.0134
Value achieved lower	43930.0	1.5	0.005	1.54	0.016	0.05	0.25	0.148	29.5	1.07	0.293	0.26	0.02	0.0036	0.45	0.0005	0.005	0.69	0.025	22.5	0.15	0.015	41.3	1.874	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	0.349	4.81	0.028	0.005	2.5e-05	0.066	0.0008	0.0003	0.278	7.73	0.05	0.1162	0.045	0.02	0.005	0.005	0.0025	0.4	0.0005	0.0001
Value unit	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre
Value unit other	mg/kg dry matter						mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter	mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter									mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown
Parameter achieved	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed			Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Not assessed	No	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed		Yes	No	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	No	Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed		No
Description parameter	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Benzo(a)pyrene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide are not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Tributyltin compounds are not assessed because have not treshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.
Related indicator	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water
Criteria status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Not good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good		Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not good
Description criteria	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Water-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Element status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Not good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good		Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not good
Description element	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).		The element has been studied in biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata)	The element has been studied in biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).			The element has been studied in marine water and sediments .		The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).
Integration rule type parameter	THRES																														THRES
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	89.00																														40.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of substances in good status																														Proportion of substances in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported																														GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2015-2016																														2015-2016
Related pressures
Related targets	T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W																														T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W

Galata-Emine (BLK-BG-AA-GalataEmine)

Simplified table

GES component	D8
Feature	Contaminants - non UPBT substances																												Contaminants - UPBT substances
Element	Aluminium and its compounds		Anthracene	Arsenic and its compounds	Bisphenol A	Cadmium and its compounds		Copper and its compounds		Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)	Fluoranthene			Hexachlorobenzene			Hexachlorobutadiene		Lead and its compounds		Naphthalene	Nickel and its compounds		Octylphenol (4-(1,1',3,3'-tetramethylbutyl)-phenol)	Pentachlorobenzene	Polychlorinated biphenyls (7 PCB: 28,52,101,118,138,153,180)	Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')	Zinc and its compounds	Benzo(a)pyrene			Brominated diphenylethers (congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154)	Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs)	Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide	Mercury and its compounds			Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene			Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene		Tributyltin compounds
Element code	CAS_7429-90-5		CAS_120-12-7	CAS_7440-38-2	CAS_80-05-7	CAS_7440-43-9		CAS_7440-50-8		CAS_117-81-7	CAS_206-44-0			CAS_118-74-1			CAS_87-68-3		CAS_7439-92-1		CAS_91-20-3	CAS_7440-02-0		CAS_140-66-9	CAS_608-93-5	EEA_33-38-5	EEA_32-03-1	CAS_7440-66-6	CAS_50-32-8			EEA_32-04-2	EEA_33-58-9	EEA_33-50-1	CAS_7439-97-6			SUMBK			SUMBI		TBTIN
Element code source	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Undefined			Undefined		ICES
Element 2																																		Fish: Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius				Fish:
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU		EU		EU	EU			EU			EU		EU		EU	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU			EU	EU	EU	EU			EU			EU		EU
Criterion	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1
Parameter	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment
Parameter other
Threshold value upper		10.0	0.1	10.0	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0		0.05	55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0		0.07	0.017		0.017		0.00082
Threshold value lower		10.0	0.1	10.0	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0			55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0			0.017
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)			Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	20230.0	3.48	0.005	1.53	0.05	0.25	0.179	8.7	1.22	0.596	2.41	0.005	0.0036	2.5	0.0005	0.005	6.25	0.025	14.3	0.241	0.015	20.8	4.13	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	4.82	0.25	0.005	2.5e-05	0.461	0.0013	2.5	112.43	0.05	0.23	0.767	0.005		0.005	0.0025	10.0	0.0005
Value achieved lower	13410.0	2.99	0.005	1.46	0.05	0.25	0.111	8.7	1.18	0.341	0.45	0.005	0.0036	0.45	0.0005	0.005	1.14	0.025	6.2	0.233	0.015	10.7	2.026	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	4.82	0.045	0.005	2.5e-05	0.058	0.0003	0.45	11.95	0.05	0.21	0.045	0.005		0.005	0.0025	0.27	0.0005
Value unit	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other
Value unit other	mg/kg dry matter					mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter	mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter								mg/kg dry matter						mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown
Parameter achieved	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed			Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed		Yes	No	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	No	Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description parameter	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Benzo(a)pyrene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Tributyltin compounds are not assessed because have not treshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Related indicator	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment
Criteria status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good	Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description criteria	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Water-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Element status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good	Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description element	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius).		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius)			The element has been studied in biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius)	The element has been studied in biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius)		The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius)			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus, Mullus barbatus Pontius).			The element has been studied in marine water and sediments		The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Sprattus Sprattus sulinus, Neogobius melanostomus).
Integration rule type parameter	THRES																												THRES
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	100.00																												50.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of substances in good status																												Proportion of substances in good status
GES achieved	GES achieved																												GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2015-2016																												2015-2016
Related pressures
Related targets	T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W																												T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W

Kaliakra-Galata (BLK-BG-AA-KaliakraGalata)

Simplified table

GES component	D8
Feature	Contaminants - non UPBT substances																													Contaminants - UPBT substances
Element	Aluminium and its compounds		Anthracene	Arsenic and its compounds	Atrazine	Bisphenol A	Cadmium and its compounds		Copper and its compounds		Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)	Fluoranthene			Hexachlorobenzene			Hexachlorobutadiene		Lead and its compounds		Naphthalene	Nickel and its compounds		Octylphenol (4-(1,1',3,3'-tetramethylbutyl)-phenol)	Pentachlorobenzene	Polychlorinated biphenyls (7 PCB: 28,52,101,118,138,153,180)	Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')	Zinc and its compounds	Benzo(a)pyrene			Brominated diphenylethers (congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154)	Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs)	Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide	Mercury and its compounds			Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene			Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene		Tributyltin compounds
Element code	CAS_7429-90-5		CAS_120-12-7	CAS_7440-38-2	CAS_1912-24-9	CAS_80-05-7	CAS_7440-43-9		CAS_7440-50-8		CAS_117-81-7	CAS_206-44-0			CAS_118-74-1			CAS_87-68-3		CAS_7439-92-1		CAS_91-20-3	CAS_7440-02-0		CAS_140-66-9	CAS_608-93-5	EEA_33-38-5	EEA_32-03-1	CAS_7440-66-6	CAS_50-32-8			EEA_32-04-2	EEA_33-58-9	EEA_33-50-1	CAS_7439-97-6			SUMBK			SUMBI		TBTIN
Element code source	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Undefined			Undefined		ICES
Element 2															Fish and shelfish: Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU		EU		EU	EU			EU			EU		EU		EU	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU			EU	EU	EU	EU			EU			EU		EU
Criterion	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1
Parameter	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water
Parameter other
Threshold value upper		10.0	0.1	10.0	0.6	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0		0.05	55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0		0.07	0.017		0.017		0.00082			0.0002
Threshold value lower		10.0	0.1	10.0	0.6	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0			55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0			0.017							0.0002
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)			Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)			Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	26210.0	4.22	0.005	1.586	0.012	0.05	0.25	0.643	20.3	1.334	0.422	5.55	0.04	0.0036	5.0	0.036	0.005	12.5	0.025	15.4	0.27	0.021	31.0	2.873	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	9.947	0.5	0.005	2.5e-05	14.85	0.0006	5.0	33.0	0.05	0.2167	0.5	0.02	0.005	0.02	0.0025	12.8	0.0024	0.0076
Value achieved lower	9721.0	1.5	0.005	1.483	0.012	0.05	0.25	0.195	9.6	1.016	0.336	5.55	0.03	0.0036	1.0	0.0005	0.005	2.5	0.025	11.0	0.249	0.015	8.0	1.807	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	4.815	0.5	0.005	2.5e-05	0.028	0.0003	1.0	14.0	0.05	0.1556	0.5	0.01	0.005	0.005	0.0025	0.4	0.0016	0.0005
Value unit	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per kilogram of wet weight
Value unit other	mg/kg dry matter						mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter	mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter								mg/kg dry matter						mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown
Parameter achieved	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	No	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	No	Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed		No
Description parameter	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide are not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Tributyltin compounds are not assessed because have not treshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.
Related indicator	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota		Contaminants in water
Criteria status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Good			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good	Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not good
Description criteria	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Water-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Element status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Good			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good	Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not good
Description element	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Shelfish Rapana venosa)			he element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Fish and shelfish: Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Fish and shelfish: Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa)		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Shelfish: Rapana Venosa)			The element has been studied in biota (Fish and shelfish: Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa)	The element has been studied in biota (Fish and shelfish: Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa)	The element has been studied in biota (Fish and shelfish: Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa)	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa)			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Shelfish: Rapana Venosa).			The element has been studied in marine water and sediments .		The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota ( Mugil cephalus, Rapana Venosa)
Integration rule type parameter	THRES																													THRES
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	95.00																													40.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of substances in good status																													Proportion of substances in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported																													GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2015-2016																													2015-2016
Related pressures
Related targets	T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W																													T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W

Sozopol-Rezovo (BLK-BG-AA-MaslennosRezovo)

Simplified table

GES component	D8
Feature	Contaminants - non UPBT substances																												Contaminants - UPBT substances
Element	Aluminium and its compounds		Anthracene	Arsenic and its compounds	Bisphenol A	Cadmium and its compounds		Copper and its compounds		Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)	Fluoranthene			Hexachlorobenzene			Hexachlorobutadiene		Lead and its compounds		Naphthalene	Nickel and its compounds		Octylphenol (4-(1,1',3,3'-tetramethylbutyl)-phenol)	Pentachlorobenzene	Polychlorinated biphenyls (7 PCB: 28,52,101,118,138,153,180)	Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')	Zinc and its compounds	Benzo(a)pyrene			Brominated diphenylethers (congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154)		Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs)	Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide	Mercury and its compounds			Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene			Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene		Tributyltin compounds
Element code	CAS_7429-90-5		CAS_120-12-7	CAS_7440-38-2	CAS_80-05-7	CAS_7440-43-9		CAS_7440-50-8		CAS_117-81-7	CAS_206-44-0			CAS_118-74-1			CAS_87-68-3		CAS_7439-92-1		CAS_91-20-3	CAS_7440-02-0		CAS_140-66-9	CAS_608-93-5	EEA_33-38-5	EEA_32-03-1	CAS_7440-66-6	CAS_50-32-8			EEA_32-04-2		EEA_33-58-9	EEA_33-50-1	CAS_7439-97-6			SUMBK			SUMBI		TBTIN
Element code source	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Undefined			Undefined		ICES
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU		EU		EU	EU			EU			EU		EU		EU	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU			EU		EU	EU	EU			EU			EU		EU
Criterion	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1
Parameter	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment
Parameter other
Threshold value upper		10.0	0.1	10.0	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0		0.05	55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085		0.0065	0.0067	20.0		0.07	0.017		0.017		0.00082
Threshold value lower		10.0	0.1	10.0	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0			55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085		0.0065	0.0067	20.0			0.017
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)			Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	11620.0	2.31	0.005	1.48	0.05	0.25	0.28	9.4	1.48	0.399	2.85	0.005	0.0036	2.5	0.0005	0.005	6.25	0.025	5.0	0.48	0.019	8.9	2.8	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	4.82	0.25	0.005	2.5e-05	0.12	0.0004	0.00065	2.5	22.3	0.05	0.1719	0.25	0.005		0.005	0.0025	1.0	0.0005
Value achieved lower	11620.0	2.31	0.005	1.48	0.05	0.25	0.19	9.4	1.48	0.399	2.85	0.005	0.0036	2.5	0.0005	0.005	6.25	0.025	5.0	0.48	0.019	8.9	2.49	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	4.82	0.25	0.005	2.5e-05	0.12	0.0004	0.00065	2.5	22.3	0.05	0.1719	0.25	0.005		0.005	0.0025	1.0	0.0005
Value unit	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other
Value unit other	mg/kg dry matter					mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter	mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter								mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown
Parameter achieved	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed			Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed		Yes	No	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	No	Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description parameter	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Benzo(a)pyrene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide are not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Tributyltin compounds are not assessed because have not treshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Related indicator	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment
Criteria status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good		Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description criteria	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Water-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Element status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good		Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description element	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).		The element has been studied in biota (Neogobius melanostomus)	The element has been studied in biota (Neogobius melanostomus).	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).			The element has been studied in marine water and sediments .		The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Neogobius melanostomus).
Integration rule type parameter	THRES																												THRES
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	94.00																												50.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of substances in good status																												Proportion of substances in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported																												GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2015-2016																												2015-2016
Related pressures
Related targets	T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W																												T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W

Open sea (BLK-BG-AA-OpenSea)

Simplified table

GES component	D8
Feature	Contaminants - non UPBT substances														Contaminants - UPBT substances
Element	Aluminium and its compounds	Anthracene	Arsenic and its compounds	Cadmium and its compounds	Fluoranthene		Hexachlorobenzene	Hexachlorobutadiene	Lead and its compounds	Naphthalene	Nickel and its compounds	Polychlorinated biphenyls (7 PCB: 28,52,101,118,138,153,180)	Uranium	Zinc and its compounds	Benzo(a)pyrene		Brominated diphenylethers (congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154)	Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs)	Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide	Mercury and its compounds		Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene		Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene	Tributyltin compounds
Element code	CAS_7429-90-5	CAS_120-12-7	CAS_7440-38-2	CAS_7440-43-9	CAS_206-44-0		CAS_118-74-1	CAS_87-68-3	CAS_7439-92-1	CAS_91-20-3	CAS_7440-02-0	EEA_33-38-5	CAS_7440-61-1	CAS_7440-66-6	CAS_50-32-8		EEA_32-04-2	EEA_33-58-9	EEA_33-50-1	CAS_7439-97-6		SUMBK		SUMBI	TBTIN
Element code source	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Undefined		Undefined	ICES
Element 2																	Fish:
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU		EU		EU	EU
Criterion	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1
Parameter	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in water
Parameter other
Threshold value upper	10.0	0.1	10.0	0.2	30.0	0.0063	10.0	55.0	1.3	2.0	8.6	0.0005	5.0	40.0	5.0	0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0	0.07	0.017		0.00082		0.0002
Threshold value lower	10.0	0.1	10.0	0.2	30.0	0.0063	10.0	55.0	1.3	2.0	8.6	0.0005	5.0	40.0	5.0	0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0		0.017				0.0002
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)				Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	6.16	0.0071	1.74	0.12	3.275	0.0071	1.25	3.125	0.598	0.023	3.91	5e-05	1.948	3.92	0.125	2.5e-05	0.1805	0.174	0.125	855.0	0.06	0.125	0.005	0.0025	4.38	0.000438
Value achieved lower	1.5	0.0071	1.46	0.03	3.275	0.0071	1.25	3.125	0.15	0.015	2.27	5e-05	1.719	3.92	0.125	2.5e-05	0.1805	0.174	0.125	855.0	0.05	0.125	0.005	0.0025	4.38	4.8e-05
Value unit	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per litre
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed		Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	No	No	Not assessed	No		Not assessed		Not assessed	Not assessed	No
Description parameter	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Benzo(a)pyrene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide are not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Tributyltin compounds are not assessed because have not treshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.
Related indicator	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in water
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not assessed		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good		Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not good		Not assessed		Not assessed	Not good
Description criteria	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not assessed		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good		Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not good		Not assessed		Not assessed	Not good
Description element	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and biota (Squalus acanthias).		The element has been studied in biota (Squalus acanthias).	The element has been studied in biota (Squalus acanthias).	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and biota (Squalus acanthias).		The element has been studied in biota (Squalus acanthias)	The element has been studied in biota (Squalus acanthias)	The element has been studied in biota (Squalus acanthias).	The element has been studied in marine water and biota (Squalus acanthias).		The element has been studied in marine water and biota (Squalus acanthias).		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine waterts and biota (Squalus acanthias).
Integration rule type parameter	THRES														THRES
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	100.00														20.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of substances in good status														Proportion of substances in good status
GES achieved	GES achieved														GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2015-2016														2015-2016
Related pressures
Related targets	T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W														T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W

Shelf (BLK-BG-AA-Shelf)

Simplified table

GES component	D8
Feature	Contaminants - non UPBT substances																						Contaminants - UPBT substances
Element	Aluminium and its compounds		Anthracene		Arsenic and its compounds		Cadmium and its compounds		Fluoranthene			Hexachlorobenzene	Hexachlorobutadiene	Lead and its compounds		Naphthalene		Nickel and its compounds		Polychlorinated biphenyls (7 PCB: 28,52,101,118,138,153,180)	Uranium	Zinc and its compounds	Benzo(a)pyrene			Brominated diphenylethers (congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154)	Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs)	Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide	Mercury and its compounds			Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene			Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene		Tributyltin compounds
Element code	CAS_7429-90-5		CAS_120-12-7		CAS_7440-38-2		CAS_7440-43-9		CAS_206-44-0			CAS_118-74-1	CAS_87-68-3	CAS_7439-92-1		CAS_91-20-3		CAS_7440-02-0		EEA_33-38-5	CAS_7440-61-1	CAS_7440-66-6	CAS_50-32-8			EEA_32-04-2	EEA_33-58-9	EEA_33-50-1	CAS_7439-97-6			SUMBK			SUMBI		TBTIN
Element code source	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Undefined			Undefined		ICES
Element 2									Fish: Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	EU		EU		EU		EU		EU			EU	EU	EU		EU		EU		EU	EU	EU	EU			EU	EU	EU	EU			EU			EU		EU
Criterion	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1		D8C1		D8C1			D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1
Parameter	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment		Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in water
Parameter other
Threshold value upper		10.0		0.1		10.0		0.2	30.0		0.0063	10.0	55.0		1.3		2.0		8.6	0.0005	5.0	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0		0.07	0.017		0.017		0.00082		0.0002
Threshold value lower		10.0		0.1		10.0		0.2	30.0		0.0063	10.0	55.0		1.3		2.0		8.6	0.0005	5.0	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085	0.0065	0.0067	20.0			0.017						0.0002
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	47730.0	4.58	0.005	0.0087	11.1	1.81	0.25	0.612	1.95	0.03	0.0087	1.25	3.1	25.5	0.57	0.01	0.04	54.0	4.33	5e-05	3.171	4.98	0.13	0.02	5.3e-05	0.094	0.0023	1.25	26.87	0.58	0.062	0.13	0.04	0.005	0.04	0.0025	0.5	0.000563
Value achieved lower	27030.0	1.5	0.005	0.0087	6.0	1.52	0.25	0.081	1.29	0.005	0.0087	1.0	2.5	5.0	0.15	0.005	0.015	27.8	3.13	5e-05	1.146	4.98	0.1	0.005	2.5e-05	0.051	0.0003	1.0	21.13	0.05	0.036	0.1	0.005		0.005	0.0025	0.4	2.5e-05
Value unit	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per kilogram of dry weight	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight
Value unit other	mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter						mg/kg dry matter						mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown		Unknown		Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown
Parameter achieved	Not assessed	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed			Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed		Yes	No	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed	No
Description parameter	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Benzo(a)pyrene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide are not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Tributyltin compounds are not assessed because have not treshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.
Related indicator	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in water
Criteria status	Good		Good		Good		Not good		Not assessed			Good	Good	Good		Good		Good		Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good	Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not good
Description criteria	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.
Element status	Good		Good		Good		Not good		Not assessed			Good	Good	Good		Good		Good		Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good	Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not good
Description element	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota ( Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus).			The element has been studied in biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus).	The element has been studied in biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus).	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota. It is assessed in water and biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus).			The element has been studied in biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus)	The element has been studied in biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus)	The element has been studied in biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus).	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota. It is assessed in water and biota (Trachurus mediterraneus ponticus, Mullus barbatus Pontius, Alosa immaculata).			The element has been studied in marine water and sediments .		The element has been studied in marine water and biota (Mullus barbatus Pontius, Merlangius merlangus).
Integration rule type parameter	THRES																						THRES
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	92.00																						40.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of substances in good status																						Proportion of substances in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported																						GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2015-2016																						2015-2016
Related pressures
Related targets	T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W																						T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W

Sivriburun-Kaliakra (BLK-BG-AA-SivriburunKaliakra)

Simplified table

GES component	D8
Feature	Contaminants - non UPBT substances																													Contaminants - UPBT substances
Element	Aluminium and its compounds		Anthracene	Arsenic and its compounds	Atrazine	Bisphenol A	Cadmium and its compounds		Copper and its compounds		Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)	Fluoranthene			Hexachlorobenzene			Hexachlorobutadiene		Lead and its compounds		Naphthalene	Nickel and its compounds		Octylphenol (4-(1,1',3,3'-tetramethylbutyl)-phenol)	Pentachlorobenzene	Polychlorinated biphenyls (7 PCB: 28,52,101,118,138,153,180)	Total DDT (DDT, p,p' + DDT, o,p' + DDE, p,p' + DDD, p,p')	Zinc and its compounds	Benzo(a)pyrene			Brominated diphenylethers (congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154)		Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs)	Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide	Mercury and its compounds			Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene			Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene		Tributyltin compounds
Element code	CAS_7429-90-5		CAS_120-12-7	CAS_7440-38-2	CAS_1912-24-9	CAS_80-05-7	CAS_7440-43-9		CAS_7440-50-8		CAS_117-81-7	CAS_206-44-0			CAS_118-74-1			CAS_87-68-3		CAS_7439-92-1		CAS_91-20-3	CAS_7440-02-0		CAS_140-66-9	CAS_608-93-5	EEA_33-38-5	EEA_32-03-1	CAS_7440-66-6	CAS_50-32-8			EEA_32-04-2		EEA_33-58-9	EEA_33-50-1	CAS_7439-97-6			SUMBK			SUMBI		TBTIN
Element code source	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view		Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view	Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view			Undefined			Undefined		ICES
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU		EU		EU	EU			EU			EU		EU		EU	EU		EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU			EU		EU	EU	EU			EU			EU		EU
Criterion	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1		D8C1	D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1		D8C1	D8C1	D8C1			D8C1			D8C1		D8C1
Parameter	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in sediment	Concentration in water	Concentration in biota	Concentration in sediment
Parameter other
Threshold value upper		10.0	0.1	10.0	0.6	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0		0.05	55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085		0.0065	0.0067	20.0		0.07	0.017		0.017		0.00082
Threshold value lower		10.0	0.1	10.0	0.6	1.0		0.2		5.2	1.3	30.0		0.0063	10.0			55.0			1.3	2.0		8.6	0.01	0.0007	0.0005	0.025	40.0	5.0		0.00017	0.0085		0.0065	0.0067	20.0			0.017
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)			Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)	Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)		Priority substances Directive (2013/39/EU)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	8799.0	2.352	0.005	1.597	0.017	0.05	0.25	0.247	3.4	1.475	0.838	10.63	0.005	0.0036	3.333	0.0005	0.005	8.33	0.025	5.0	0.278	0.019	9.5	1.664	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	4.82	1.8	0.005	2.5e-05	3.14	0.0002	0.0014	3.333	60.7	0.05	0.1629	4.3	0.005		0.005	0.0025	7.33	0.0005
Value achieved lower	8799.0	2.267	0.005	1.58	0.017	0.05	0.25	0.175	3.4	1.457	0.211	1.08	0.005	0.0036	1.538	0.0005	0.005	0.96	0.025	5.0	0.243	0.015	9.5	1.658	0.0015	0.0001	5e-05	0.0001	4.82	0.1	0.005	2.5e-05	0.19	0.0002	0.0007	0.385	26.0	0.05	0.1581	0.25	0.005		0.005	0.0025	0.15	0.0005
Value unit	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other	microgram per litre	Other	microgram per litre	microgram per kilogram of wet weight	Other
Value unit other	mg/kg dry matter						mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter	mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter								mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter				mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter		mg/kg dry matter			mg/kg dry matter
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown			Unknown			Unknown		Unknown
Parameter achieved	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed			Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Not assessed		Yes	No	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	No	Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description parameter	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. Fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Benzo(a)pyrene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide are not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Sediments аре not assessed because there are no threshold values	GES/Non GES were assessed as 95 data percentile compared to maximum allowable concentration MAC-EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because tresholds apply to molluscs.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.	Sum of Benzo(ghi)perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene is not assessed because the LOQ of the method is higher than threshold value.	The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Tributyltin compounds are not assessed because have not treshold values.	Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Related indicator	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in sediment	Contaminants in water	Contaminants in biota	Contaminants in sediment
Criteria status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good		Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description criteria	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values			Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data.	Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Waters-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.			Water-GES/Non GES were assessed as the 95th upper confidence interval compared to AA_EQS. The maximum allowable concentration was assessed by a calculated 95 percentile compared to MAC-EQS. MAC-EQS were used for GES assessment when the observations are for a period of less than 12 months and when there is no AA_EQS value. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.		Biota-The values of 5% lipid weight and 26% dry weight content (only for Hg and PFOS) for fish, and 1% lipid weight and 8.3% dry weight content for shellfish were used for normalising contaminant concentrations on a lipids obtained from literature data. Sediments-not assessed because there are no threshold values.
Element status	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good		Good		Good	Not assessed			Good			Good		Good		Good	Good		Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good			Not good		Good	Not assessed	Not good			Not assessed			Not assessed		Not assessed
Description element	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).		The element has been studied in marine water and sediments		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water and sediments.		The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water.	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota. It is assessed in water and biota (Fish: Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).			The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).		The element has been studied in biota (Pomatomus saltatrix, Neogobius melanostomus, Psetta maxima maeotica)	The element has been studied in biota (Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).	The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota (Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).			The element has been studied in marine water, sediments and biota. It is assessed in water and biota (Fish: Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).			The element has been studied in marine water and sediments .		The element has been studied in sediments and biota (Pomatomus saltatrix,Neogobius melanostomus,Psetta maxima maeotica).
Integration rule type parameter	THRES																													THRES
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	95.00																													50.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of substances in good status																													Proportion of substances in good status
GES achieved	GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported																													GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period	2015-2016																													2015-2016
Related pressures
Related targets	T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W																													T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants B T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants S T_BLK-BG_D8C1_Contaminants W