Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-F / Germany / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
Member State | Germany |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
Report date | 2020-02-17 |
Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Deutsche Nordsee (ANSDE_MS)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Acipenser sturio |
Acipenser sturio |
Acipenser sturio |
Acipenser sturio |
Acipenser sturio |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Chelon labrosus |
Chelon labrosus |
Chelon labrosus |
Chelon labrosus |
Chelon labrosus |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Hippocampus hippocampus |
Hippocampus hippocampus |
Hippocampus hippocampus |
Hippocampus hippocampus |
Hippocampus hippocampus |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dasyatis pastinaca |
Dipturus batis |
Dipturus batis |
Dipturus batis |
Dipturus batis |
Dipturus batis |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gaidropsarus vulgaris |
Gaidropsarus vulgaris |
Gaidropsarus vulgaris |
Gaidropsarus vulgaris |
Gaidropsarus vulgaris |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Mustelus asterias |
Mustelus asterias |
Mustelus asterias |
Mustelus asterias |
Mustelus asterias |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Zoarces viviparus |
Zoarces viviparus |
Zoarces viviparus |
Zoarces viviparus |
Zoarces viviparus |
Alosa alosa |
Alosa alosa |
Alosa alosa |
Alosa alosa |
Alosa alosa |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Cetorhinus maximus |
Cetorhinus maximus |
Cetorhinus maximus |
Cetorhinus maximus |
Cetorhinus maximus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Lamna nasus |
Lamna nasus |
Lamna nasus |
Lamna nasus |
Lamna nasus |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Squalus acanthias |
Squalus acanthias |
Squalus acanthias |
Squalus acanthias |
Squalus acanthias |
Element code |
126279 |
126279 |
126279 |
126279 |
126279 |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
126977 |
126977 |
126977 |
126977 |
126977 |
712453 |
712453 |
712453 |
712453 |
712453 |
127380 |
127380 |
127380 |
127380 |
127380 |
101172 |
101172 |
101172 |
101172 |
101172 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
105865 |
105865 |
105865 |
105865 |
105865 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105851 |
105869 |
105869 |
105869 |
105869 |
105869 |
150637 |
150637 |
150637 |
150637 |
150637 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126458 |
126458 |
126458 |
126458 |
126458 |
126437 |
126437 |
126437 |
126437 |
126437 |
105821 |
105821 |
105821 |
105821 |
105821 |
101174 |
101174 |
101174 |
101174 |
101174 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
105883 |
105883 |
105883 |
105883 |
105883 |
105887 |
105887 |
105887 |
105887 |
105887 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127150 |
127150 |
127150 |
127150 |
127150 |
105814 |
105814 |
105814 |
105814 |
105814 |
127123 |
127123 |
127123 |
127123 |
127123 |
126413 |
126413 |
126413 |
126413 |
126413 |
126415 |
126415 |
126415 |
126415 |
126415 |
105837 |
105837 |
105837 |
105837 |
105837 |
127214 |
127214 |
127214 |
127214 |
127214 |
126975 |
126975 |
126975 |
126975 |
126975 |
105820 |
105820 |
105820 |
105820 |
105820 |
105841 |
105841 |
105841 |
105841 |
105841 |
127186 |
127186 |
127186 |
127186 |
127186 |
105923 |
105923 |
105923 |
105923 |
105923 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
OSPAR |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Spawning Stock Biomass
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Spawning Stock Biomass
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Spawning Stock Biomass
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
358.0 |
82179.63 |
64835.32 |
49036.55 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Other (specify)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Other (specify)
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
67.0 |
4799.13 |
358.0 |
82179.63 |
197.0 |
63466.91 |
1.0 |
3537.31 |
49036.55 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes, based on low risk |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
To be descriptive: ?Aiel higher than current value?. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
To be descriptive: ?Aiel higher than current value?.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The current appropriate and also utilised area of habitat is estimated at 230.324 ha of ha. Overall, habitat quality is not classified well.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
For the species, it is currently unclear where the threshold for the favourable conservation status of the population is to be determined according to the assessment under the Habitats Directive.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Assessment of expert judgement, so far no quantitative value has been established for the minimum area of land required to be found in good habitat quality. The current suitable habitat is estimated at 5.261.768 hectares. Overall, habitat quality is not classified well.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
To be descriptive: ?Aiel higher than current value?.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
So far no threshold could be established as part of the assessment under the Habitats Directive.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
There is a lack of data on the abundance of the species, which means that the evaluation of expert judgement has been carried out.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Evaluation of expert judgement, so far no quantitative value has been established for the minimum area of land required to be found in good habitat quality. The current potentially suitable area of habitat is estimated at 4 921 148 ha. Overall, habitat quality is not classified well.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is highly vulnerable.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good as the population after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is considered not to be good, since dissemination under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html.html
|
Criterion D1C5 is considered not to be good, since the habitat for the species according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the population after a national assessment under the Habitats Directive reaches the favourable conservation status. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Criterion D1C5 is assessed as not good, since the habitat for the species does not reach the favourable conservation status according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is highly vulnerable.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is in danger of extinction.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed on the basis of poor data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
For stocks/species that are assessed under Descriptor 1 and Descriptor 3, descriptor 3 shall be used for descriptor 1. Therefore, the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) will also be used for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to the lack of available data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is highly vulnerable.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
For the species, it is currently unclear where the threshold for the favourable conservation status of the population is to be determined according to the assessment under the Habitats Directive.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is considered not to be good, since dissemination under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Criterion D1C5 is considered not to be good, since the partial assessment of the habitat quality after the national assessment under the Habitats Directive does not reach the highest conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
For stocks/species that are assessed under Descriptor 1 and Descriptor 3, descriptor 3 shall be used for descriptor 1. Therefore, the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) will also be used for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is in danger of extinction.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
For stocks/species that are assessed under Descriptor 1 and Descriptor 3, descriptor 3 shall be used for descriptor 1. Therefore, the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) will also be used for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk. It is currently on the alert list.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good as the population after a national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
So far no threshold could be established as part of the assessment under the Habitats Directive.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Criterion D1C5 is classified as good, since the habitat for the species according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive reaches the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good as the population after a national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Criterion D1C5 is considered not to be good, since the habitat for the species according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is highly vulnerable.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is in danger of extinction.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is in danger of extinction.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|