Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Germany / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Germany |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
Report date | 2020-02-17 |
Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Deutsche Nordsee (ANSDE_MS)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Cancer pagurus |
Cancer pagurus |
Cancer pagurus |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Chelidonichthys lucerna |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Crangon crangon |
Crangon crangon |
Crangon crangon |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Engraulis encrasicolus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Microstomus kitt |
Microstomus kitt |
Microstomus kitt |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Nephrops norvegicus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element code |
125909 |
125909 |
125909 |
125909 |
125909 |
125909 |
107276 |
107276 |
107276 |
127262 |
127262 |
127262 |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
107552 |
107552 |
107552 |
126426 |
126426 |
126426 |
150637 |
150637 |
150637 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
127139 |
127139 |
127139 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
127140 |
127140 |
127140 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
107254 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
154473 |
154473 |
154473 |
127023 |
127023 |
127023 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea) |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Grey gurnard in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Divisions VIId (Eastern Channel) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat) |
Grey gurnard in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Divisions VIId (Eastern Channel) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat) |
Grey gurnard in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Divisions VIId (Eastern Channel) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea IV and Divisions VIId and IIIa West (North Sea, Eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea IV and Divisions VIId and IIIa West (North Sea, Eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea IV and Divisions VIId and IIIa West (North Sea, Eastern English Channel, Skagerrak) |
DAB in Subarea IV and Division IIIa
|
DAB in Subarea IV and Division IIIa
|
DAB in Subarea IV and Division IIIa
|
Whiting Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division VIId (Eastern Channel) |
Whiting Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division VIId (Eastern Channel) |
Whiting Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division VIId (Eastern Channel) |
Lemon sole in Subarea IV and Divisions IIIa and VIId |
Lemon sole in Subarea IV and Divisions IIIa and VIId |
Lemon sole in Subarea IV and Divisions IIIa and VIId |
Nephrops in Division IVb (off Horn Reef, FU 33)
|
Nephrops in Division IVb (off Horn Reef, FU 33)
|
Nephrops in Division IVb (off Horn Reef, FU 33)
|
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea) |
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea) |
Plaice Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Plaice Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Plaice Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Turbot in Subarea IV
|
Turbot in Subarea IV
|
Turbot in Subarea IV
|
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components) |
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components) |
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components) |
Sole in Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Sole in Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Sole in Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Sprat in Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Sprat in Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Sprat in Subarea IV (North Sea)
|
Element 2 code |
san.sa.1r
|
san.sa.1r
|
san.sa.1r
|
san.sa.2r
|
san.sa.2r
|
san.sa.2r
|
gur-comb
|
gur-comb
|
gur-comb
|
her.27.3a47d
|
her.27.3a47d
|
her.27.3a47d
|
gug-347d
|
gug-347d
|
gug-347d
|
cod.27.47d20
|
cod.27.47d20
|
cod.27.47d20
|
dab.27.3a4
|
dab.27.3a4
|
dab.27.3a4
|
whg.27.47d
|
whg.27.47d
|
whg.27.47d
|
lem.27.3a47d
|
lem.27.3a47d
|
lem.27.3a47d
|
nep-33
|
nep-33
|
nep-33
|
nep.27.4outFU
|
nep.27.4outFU
|
nep.27.4outFU
|
ple.27.420
|
ple.27.420
|
ple.27.420
|
tur.27.4
|
tur.27.4
|
tur.27.4
|
mac.27.nea
|
mac.27.nea
|
mac.27.nea
|
sol.27.4
|
sol.27.4
|
sol.27.4
|
spr.27.4
|
spr.27.4
|
spr.27.4
|
|||||||||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
|||||||||
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Stocks are assessed according to ICES Escape Strategy, i.e. no assessment limits for D3C1 are established (ICES 2017).
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
Stocks are assessed according to ICES Escape Strategy, i.e. no assessment limits for D3C1 are established (ICES 2017).
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
Stock is assessed according to ICES Escape Strategy, i.e. no assessment limits for D3C1 are established (ICES 2017).
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
Assessments period |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|