Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Germany / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D3 Commercial fish and shellfish
Member State Germany
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit
Report date 2020-02-17
Report access DE_ART8_GES.xml

Deutsche Nordsee (ANSDE_MS)

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Ammodytes spp
Ammodytes spp
Ammodytes spp
Ammodytes spp
Ammodytes spp
Ammodytes spp
Cancer pagurus
Cancer pagurus
Cancer pagurus
Chelidonichthys lucerna
Chelidonichthys lucerna
Chelidonichthys lucerna
Clupea harengus
Clupea harengus
Clupea harengus
Crangon crangon
Crangon crangon
Crangon crangon
Engraulis encrasicolus
Engraulis encrasicolus
Engraulis encrasicolus
Eutrigla gurnardus
Eutrigla gurnardus
Eutrigla gurnardus
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Limanda limanda
Limanda limanda
Limanda limanda
Merlangius merlangus
Merlangius merlangus
Merlangius merlangus
Microstomus kitt
Microstomus kitt
Microstomus kitt
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Nephrops norvegicus
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectes platessa
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus)
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus)
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus)
Scomber scombrus
Scomber scombrus
Scomber scombrus
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris)
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris)
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris)
Sprattus sprattus
Sprattus sprattus
Sprattus sprattus
Element code
125909
125909
125909
125909
125909
125909
107276
107276
107276
127262
127262
127262
126417
126417
126417
107552
107552
107552
126426
126426
126426
150637
150637
150637
126436
126436
126436
127139
127139
127139
126438
126438
126438
127140
127140
127140
107254
107254
107254
107254
107254
107254
127143
127143
127143
154473
154473
154473
127023
127023
127023
127160
127160
127160
126425
126425
126425
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank)
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank)
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, Sandeel Area 1r (central and southern North Sea, Dogger Bank)
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea)
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea)
Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) in divisions 4.b and 4.c, and Subdivision 20, Sandeel Area 2r (Skagerrak, central and southern North Sea)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Grey gurnard in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Divisions VIId (Eastern Channel) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat)
Grey gurnard in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Divisions VIId (Eastern Channel) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat)
Grey gurnard in Subarea IV (North Sea) and Divisions VIId (Eastern Channel) and IIIa (Skagerrak - Kattegat)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea IV and Divisions VIId and IIIa West (North Sea, Eastern English Channel, Skagerrak)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea IV and Divisions VIId and IIIa West (North Sea, Eastern English Channel, Skagerrak)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea IV and Divisions VIId and IIIa West (North Sea, Eastern English Channel, Skagerrak)
DAB in Subarea IV and Division IIIa
DAB in Subarea IV and Division IIIa
DAB in Subarea IV and Division IIIa
Whiting Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division VIId (Eastern Channel)
Whiting Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division VIId (Eastern Channel)
Whiting Subarea IV (North Sea) and Division VIId (Eastern Channel)
Lemon sole in Subarea IV and Divisions IIIa and VIId
Lemon sole in Subarea IV and Divisions IIIa and VIId
Lemon sole in Subarea IV and Divisions IIIa and VIId
Nephrops in Division IVb (off Horn Reef, FU 33)
Nephrops in Division IVb (off Horn Reef, FU 33)
Nephrops in Division IVb (off Horn Reef, FU 33)
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea)
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea)
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Subarea 4, outside the Functional Units (North Sea)
Plaice Subarea IV (North Sea)
Plaice Subarea IV (North Sea)
Plaice Subarea IV (North Sea)
Turbot in Subarea IV
Turbot in Subarea IV
Turbot in Subarea IV
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components)
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components)
Mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic (combined Southern, Western and North Sea spawning components)
Sole in Subarea IV (North Sea)
Sole in Subarea IV (North Sea)
Sole in Subarea IV (North Sea)
Sprat in Subarea IV (North Sea)
Sprat in Subarea IV (North Sea)
Sprat in Subarea IV (North Sea)
Element 2 code
san.sa.1r
san.sa.1r
san.sa.1r
san.sa.2r
san.sa.2r
san.sa.2r
gur-comb
gur-comb
gur-comb
her.27.3a47d
her.27.3a47d
her.27.3a47d
gug-347d
gug-347d
gug-347d
cod.27.47d20
cod.27.47d20
cod.27.47d20
dab.27.3a4
dab.27.3a4
dab.27.3a4
whg.27.47d
whg.27.47d
whg.27.47d
lem.27.3a47d
lem.27.3a47d
lem.27.3a47d
nep-33
nep-33
nep-33
nep.27.4outFU
nep.27.4outFU
nep.27.4outFU
ple.27.420
ple.27.420
ple.27.420
tur.27.4
tur.27.4
tur.27.4
mac.27.nea
mac.27.nea
mac.27.nea
sol.27.4
sol.27.4
sol.27.4
spr.27.4
spr.27.4
spr.27.4
Element 2 code source
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
National
National
National
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Other
Other
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Parameter other
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Yes
Not assessed
Not assessed
No
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
No
Yes
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
No
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
No
Not assessed
Not assessed
No
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Not assessed
Description parameter
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not good
Good
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not good
Good
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not good
Good
Not assessed
Not good
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Not assessed
Description criteria
Stocks are assessed according to ICES Escape Strategy, i.e. no assessment limits for D3C1 are established (ICES 2017).
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Stocks are assessed according to ICES Escape Strategy, i.e. no assessment limits for D3C1 are established (ICES 2017).
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Stock is assessed according to ICES Escape Strategy, i.e. no assessment limits for D3C1 are established (ICES 2017).
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Element status
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Description element
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
Assessments period
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4
  • UZN4.1
  • UZN4.2
  • UZN4.4